Alternating Current Stimulation for Essential Tremor

August 31, 2020 updated by: University of Calgary

Alternating Current Stimulation for Essential Tremor: a Pilot Study to Identify the Most Promising Strategy

Movement disorders are common neurological disorders, characterized by either excess or paucity of movements. Essential tremor (ET) is one of the most common of these disorders, defined as chronic, rhythmic involuntary movements (tremor) that occur primarily during action involving the upper extremities as prominent body site. ET occurs in between 0.4% and 4% of adults below age 60, its prevalence and related impairment of routine daily actions increasing dramatically with age. More than half of patients do not regain functional independence with medications. These patients are offered functional neurosurgical approaches that carry procedural risk or adverse effects secondary to deep electric stimulation of surgical lesioning. Hence, there is a substantial need for alternative, non-invasive therapeutic options for this disabling neurological disorder. Recently, non-invasive neuromodulation applied as transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), has emerged as promising for tremor control. In healthy subjects, tACS applied with a high definition (or focused) montage to the primary motor cortex (M1), was found to entrain physiological tremor; in patients with Parkinson's disease, tACS could decrease the amplitude of rest tremor when the stimulation was delivered in phase with, and at the same frequency of, the tremor. Tremor in ET could also be entrained applying ACS to the arm skin's peripheral nerves (transcutaneous ACS), but its effect on tremor amplitude is unknown.

METHODS AND POTENTIAL CONTRIBUTION/IMPACT OF THE RESEARCH.

The proposed project aims to explore the whole potential of tACS for the tremor suppression in ET. The investigators aim to test the following hypotheses:

  1. focused (or high definition, HD) tACS delivered over M1 at the same frequency of the tremor is effective in decreasing tremor amplitude in ET;
  2. this effect is strongest when the delivery of tACS is locked to the phase of the tremor expressed by the patient, i.e. administering tACS in a closed-loop modality;
  3. transcutaneous ACS in the upper extremities is as effective as tACS applied to the scalp around M1.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This investigation will collect preliminary data on the efficacy of real vs. sham, as well as unlocked vs. phase-locked, modalities of tACS and transcutaneous ACS on tremor amplitude in 25 patients with ET.

Comparing transcranial and transcutaneous, as well as unlocked and phase-locked, modalities represents the novelty of our approach. This has the potential to generate a wealth of preliminary data forming the basis of a large, randomized controlled trial of multiple sessions of this intervention, hence potentially capable of producing long-lasting effects, in this common and disabling disorder. Given its non-invasiveness and relatively low cost, this approach has, if effective, a huge therapeutic potential in ET.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria for ET (APA, DSM V).
  • 18 years of age or older.
  • Participants should be either un-medicated or on stable medication treatment for tremor for the previous 3 months.
  • Psychiatric comorbidities should be clinically stable; treatment has not changed in the last 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have a metal object/implant in their brain, skull, scalp, or neck.
  • Have an implantable device (e.g., cardiac pacemaker).
  • Have a diagnosis of epilepsy or cardiac disease.
  • Have a history of traumatic brain injury, learning disability or dyslexia.
  • Have a severe impediment in vision or hearing.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Real tACS
For transcranial stimulation, a stimulation method called high-definition tACS (HD-tACS) will be applied to target the primary motor cortex (M1), an area of the brain that is involved in controlling movement, using gel electrodes placed on the scalp. Participant will wear an electrode cap with 5 gel-filled cup HD electrodes arranged in a 4 x 1 montage, to create focused stimulation over the M1 region. A stimulator will be connected to the electrodes to deliver a low-intensity stimulating current to the scalp.
The participant will wear an electrode cap with 5 gel-filled cup HD electrodes arranged in a 4 x 1 montage.
2 saline sponge electrodes will be attached to the upper arm contralateral to hand attached to the accelerometer.
Placebo Comparator: Sham tACS
For the transcutaneous ACS, the procedure for real and sham stimulation will be identical to HD-tDCS, but ACS will be delivered to the upper arm contralateral to hand attached to the accelerometer.
The participant will wear an electrode cap with 5 gel-filled cup HD electrodes arranged in a 4 x 1 montage.
2 saline sponge electrodes will be attached to the upper arm contralateral to hand attached to the accelerometer.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Essential Tremor Severity Change
Time Frame: Right before and immediately after the intervention
The tremor severity will be assessed in the participants by a Movement Disorders Neurologist.
Right before and immediately after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Essential Tremor

Clinical Trials on transcranial Altering Current Stimulation

3
Subscribe