Social Justice Advocacy Skills and Ethical Sensitivity

October 1, 2020 updated by: Nesime Demirören

The Effect of Advocacy Education on Developing Social Justice Advocacy Skills and Ethical Sensitivity in Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Randomized Controlled Study

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of advocacy education on social justice advocacy skills and ethical sensitivity in undergraduate nursing students.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Advocacy is an effort to correct or change situations that affect people, society and systems.The origin of advocacy is to provide active support in the Latin "Advocates" dictionary. It is defined as "defense work" in Turkish dictionary advocacy is an ethical dimension of nursing practices in nursing science that shows how nursing care is needed and how the nurse will approach the individual, group and society in need.Social justice advocacy has an increasing importance as people are affected by pressure from the social system.Disease, weakness and early deaths are more common in ethnic and diverse races, poor people and societies that do not receive services.Within the scope of advocacy, the duties and responsibilities of individuals, families and society have been determined by laws and regulations in order to protect and improve the health of the society. Advocacy is the nurse's professional role and ethical responsibility.Total 80 students (İntervention and control group)was selected randomly from 112 4 th grade student. Students were randomly assigned to the experimental group(n=40) and the control group(n=40). The experimental group students will take advocacy intervention courses The control group students will the routine curriculum. In this study, effect size will be determined with 5% error margin by using sample size power analysis Gpower 3.1.9.2 program. Accordingly, it was calculated that 35 students were included in the intervention and control groups with 5% error margin and 80% power. İt was decided to include at least 40 people in each working group with 20% surplus, considering that they might be lost in data collection. Theoretical education, film and video screening, case study, Social Security Institution (SSİ) Study, WEB based work, The student will preparation of advocacy action plan, students prepared poster and advocacy awareness activity, poster were exhibited at the campus. Data Collection Tools: Student Information Form, Social Justice Advocacy Scale , Moral-Ethical Sensitivity Scale. Statistical Analysis:Similarity of experimental and control groups; number, percentage, average and standard deviation, pre-test, post test; scale scores difference in dependent groups t-test.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Konya,, Turkey, 42090
        • Necmettin Erbakan University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Student who speak very well Turkish

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Foreign students who do not speak very well Turkish.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Deney group

Education Program:The education program consists of theoretical didactic education, case discussion, film and video screening in class, Web-based laboratory work, SSI practice, poster preparation and awareness activities for a total of 12 weeks and 2 hours per week (24 hours per week).

Theoretical didactic education, film screening, video screening, Web-based laboratory work, Social Security Institution study, poster preparation, poster presentation at University Campus.

Educational intervention
No Intervention: Kontrol group
The control group participated in the courses and practices included in the routine curriculum.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Social Justice Advocacy Scale score level
Time Frame: At the beginning of advocacy education, an avarage of 1 hour
Score level of social justice advocacy skill before advocacy education
At the beginning of advocacy education, an avarage of 1 hour
Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire score level
Time Frame: At the beginning of advocacy education, an avarage of 1 hour
Score level of moral sensitivity questionnaire before advocacy education. Similarity of experimental and control groups; number, percentage, average and standard deviation.
At the beginning of advocacy education, an avarage of 1 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Social Justice Advocacy Scale
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Changes in the score level of social justice advocacy skill after advocacy education
12 weeks
Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Changes in the score level of moral sensitivity questionnaire
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nesime DEMİRÖREN, Selcuk University
  • Principal Investigator: Nesime DEMİRÖREN, Necmettin Erbakan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 26, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 3, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 26, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • t5y4gddx

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Study protocol

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Educational Problems

Clinical Trials on Educational intervention

3
Subscribe