- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04589377
Mindfulness to Mitigate Psychological Threat and Improve Engagement and Learning in Introductory Physics Courses
January 6, 2023 updated by: Brian Galla, University of Pittsburgh
Mobile Mindfulness Training and Physics Learning
This project involves testing a brief mindfulness training program to reduce students' psychological threat and support motivation, engagement, and learning in introductory undergraduate physics courses.
The investigators predict that, compared to a control condition, mindfulness training will reduce psychological threat and increase motivation, engagement, and learning in physics.
Study Overview
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
149
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15260
- University of Pittsburgh
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- at least 18 years of age
- current University of Pittsburgh student
- fluent in written and spoken English
- enrolled in introductory physics
- self-reported psychological threat in physics
Exclusion Criteria:
- under 18 years of age
- not a current University of Pittsburgh student
- not fluent in written and spoken English
- not enrolled in introductory physics
- does not meet self-report psychological threat in physics
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Mindfulness Training
Participants receive 20 minutes of mindfulness training per day for five continuous days (Monday through Friday).
Training is delivered remotely to participants' computers and smartphones.
|
Training is focused on learning the principle of RAIN (recognize, accept, investigate, non-identify) in the context of physics learning.
|
No Intervention: No-Training
Participants do not receive training.
On Monday and Friday, they listen to a 20 minute audiobook to match for time.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Mean differences in Psychological Threat measured via Ecological Momentary Assessment
Time Frame: Up to 3 days post-random assignment
|
Perceived physics demands and physics coping resources, measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 6. Psychological threat is calculated by subtracting average of physics demands from average of physics resources.
Psychological threat ranges from -5 to 5, with scores above zero indicating psychological threat and scores of 0 or lower indicating psychological challenge.
|
Up to 3 days post-random assignment
|
Mean differences in Physics Motivation assessed via Ecological Momentary Assessment
Time Frame: Up to 3 days post-random assignment
|
State motivation to do physics work, measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 4. Physics motivation is calculated as an average of all items.
Physics motivation ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater motivation to do physics work.
|
Up to 3 days post-random assignment
|
Mean change in Psychological Threat measured via Self-Report
Time Frame: Up to three months post-intervention
|
Perceived physics demands and physics coping resources, measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 6. Psychological threat is calculated by subtracting average of physics demands from average of physics resources.
Psychological threat ranges from -5 to 5, with scores above zero indicating psychological threat and scores of 0 or lower indicating psychological challenge.
|
Up to three months post-intervention
|
Mean change in Physics Interest measured via Self-Report
Time Frame: Up to three months post-intervention
|
The degree by which student's want to know or learn about physics, measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 4. Physics interest is calculated as an average of all items.
Physics interest ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater interest in learning about physics.
|
Up to three months post-intervention
|
Mean change in Physics Self-Efficacy measured via Self-Report
Time Frame: Up to three months post-intervention
|
Beliefs about the ability to perform well in physics, measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 4. Physics self-efficacy is calculated as an average of all items.
Physics self-efficacy ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicated greater self-efficacy to perform well in physics.
|
Up to three months post-intervention
|
Mean change in Physics Value measured via Self-Report
Time Frame: Up to three months post-intervention
|
Perceived value of learning physics, measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 6. Physics value is calculated as an average of all items.
Physics value ranges from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater perceived value of physics learning.
|
Up to three months post-intervention
|
Mean change in Physics Identity measured via Self-Report
Time Frame: Up to three months post-intervention
|
The degree by which students identify their self-concept with physics, measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 6. Physics identity is calculated as an average of all items.
Physics identity ranges from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater self-identification with physics.
|
Up to three months post-intervention
|
Mean change in Physics Belonging measured via Self-Report
Time Frame: Up to three months post-intervention
|
Student's sense of belonging in their physics course, measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 5. Physics belonging is calculated as an average of all items.
Physics belonging ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater sense of belonging in physics.
|
Up to three months post-intervention
|
Mean change in Physics Achievement Goals measured via Self-Report
Time Frame: Up to three months post-intervention
|
Goals related to mastery approach, performance approach, or performance avoidance, measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 6.
Each subscale is calculated as an average of all of the items for each subscale.
Physics achievement goals range from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater mastery approach, performance approach, or performance avoidance goals.
|
Up to three months post-intervention
|
Mean change in Physics Growth Mindset measured via Self-Report
Time Frame: Up to three months post-intervention
|
Beliefs that intelligence and abilities for physics can be developed through dedication and hard work, measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 6. Growth mindset is calculated as an average of all items.
Growth mindset ranges from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater growth mindsets and lower scores indicating greater fixed mindsets.
|
Up to three months post-intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Mean differences in Meaning Making and Positive Reappraisal assessed via Ecological Momentary Assessment
Time Frame: Up to 3 days post-random assignment
|
Positive Construals and appraisals of a difficult experience in physics, measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 5. Positive construals and appraisals are calculated as an average of all items.
Positive construals and appraisals ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater positive reappraisal of a difficult experience in physics.
|
Up to 3 days post-random assignment
|
Mean differences in Affect assessed via Ecological Momentary Assessment
Time Frame: Up to 3 days post-random assignment
|
Positive and negative affect, measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 5. Positive and negative affect are calculated as an average of all items from each subscale.
Positive and negative affect ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater positive or negative affect, respectively.
|
Up to 3 days post-random assignment
|
Mean differences in Mindfulness assessed via Ecological Momentary Assessment
Time Frame: Up to 3 days post-random assignment
|
State mindful attention and awareness, measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 0 to 6. State mindfulness is calculated as an average of all items.
State mindfulness ranges from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater state mindful attention and awareness.
|
Up to 3 days post-random assignment
|
Mean differences in Equanimity assessed via Ecological Momentary Assessment
Time Frame: Up to 3 days post-random assignment
|
State balanced mental attitude, measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 5. State equanimity is calculated as an average of all items.
State equanimity ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating a greater balanced mental attitude.
|
Up to 3 days post-random assignment
|
Mean change in Meaning Making and Positive Reappraisal assessed via Self-Report
Time Frame: Up to three months post-intervention
|
Positive construals and appraisals of a difficult experience in physics, measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 5. Positive construals and appraisals are calculated as an average of all items.
Positive construals and appraisals ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater positive reappraisal of a difficult experience in physics.
|
Up to three months post-intervention
|
Mean change in Physics Engagement assessed via Self-Report
Time Frame: Up to three months post-intervention
|
Physics effort, cognitive strategies, metacognitive strategies, & help-seeking, with each subscale measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 6.
Each subscale is calculated as an average of all of the items for each subscale, with higher scores indicating greater effort, use of cognitive strategies, metacognitive strategies, and greater help-seeking behavior.
|
Up to three months post-intervention
|
Mean change in Physics Anxiety assessed via Self-Report
Time Frame: Up to three months post-intervention
|
Anxiety about doing physics work, measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 5. Physics anxiety is calculated as an average of all items.
Physics anxiety ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater physics anxiety.
|
Up to three months post-intervention
|
Mean change in Physics performance on the assessment
Time Frame: Change from baseline to posttest
|
Physics problem solving tasks that range in difficulty covering content from introductory physics.
Each item is scored for accuracy.
Multiple choice and forced choice items scored as correct or incorrect.
Open-ended and explanation items are scored on a rubric.
Scores are averaged across the items with higher scores indicating better physics performance.
|
Change from baseline to posttest
|
Mean differences in Performance on the Preparation for Future Learning Task
Time Frame: Posttest
|
Physics problem solving tasks that include new learning resources (e.g., a worked example) and a transfer task.
Each item is scored for accuracy.
Open-ended and explanation items are scored on a rubric.
Scores are summed across items with higher scores indicating better physics learning.
|
Posttest
|
Mean change of judgments of confidence, anxiety, and difficulty during physics assessment via Self-Report
Time Frame: Change from baseline to posttest
|
Judgments of anxiety, confidence, and difficulty during physics problem solving, with each subscale measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 6.
Each subscale is calculated as an average of all of the items, with higher scores indicating greater confidence, anxiety, and difficulty respectively.
|
Change from baseline to posttest
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Mean differences in Performance in Physics Class
Time Frame: End of semester, approximately 12 weeks
|
End-of-course grades measured via school records on a scale from 0-4.
Higher grades indicate higher classroom performance.
|
End of semester, approximately 12 weeks
|
Mean differences in Retention in Physics Classes
Time Frame: End of following semester, approximately 7 months
|
Enrollment in second semester of introductory physics course sequence measured via official school records.
Scored dichotomously, 1 for enrolling in second semester physics and 0 for not.
|
End of following semester, approximately 7 months
|
Mean change in Physics Failure Mindset assessed via Self-Report
Time Frame: Up to three months post-intervention
|
Perceptions of failure ranging from failure-is-enhancing to failure-is-debilitating, measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 5. Physics failure mindset is calculated as an average of all items.
Physics failure mindset ranges from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating a greater failure-is-debilitating mindset.
|
Up to three months post-intervention
|
Mean change in Physics Epistemological Beliefs assessed via Self-Report
Time Frame: Up to three months post-intervention
|
Beliefs about the nature of physics, measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 6. Physics beliefs is calculated as an average of all items.
Physics beliefs ranges from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater implementation of instruction and learning tools.
|
Up to three months post-intervention
|
Mean change in Physics Transfer assessed via Self-Report
Time Frame: Up to three months post-intervention
|
General self-reported learning and transfer strategies, measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 6. Physics transfer is calculated as an average of all items.
Physics transfer ranges from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater use of learning and transfer strategies.
|
Up to three months post-intervention
|
Mean change in Covid-19 Perception of Threat assessed via Self-Report
Time Frame: Up to three months post-intervention
|
Perceptions of threat due to Covid-19 and its relation to school, measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 6. Covid-19 perception of threat is calculated as an average of all items.
Covid-19 perception of threat ranges from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater perceived threat due to Covid-19.
|
Up to three months post-intervention
|
Mean change in Mindfulness assessed via Self-Report
Time Frame: Up to three months post-intervention
|
Trait mindful attention and awareness, measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 5. Trait mindfulness is calculated as an average of all items.
Trait mindfulness ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater mindful attention and awareness; will also be used as covariate or moderator Trait mindful attention and awareness, measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 5. Trait mindfulness is calculated as an average of all items.
Trait mindfulness ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater mindful attention and awareness; will also be used as covariate or moderator
|
Up to three months post-intervention
|
Mean change in Emotion Regulation assessed via Self-Report
Time Frame: Up to three months post-intervention
|
Trait emotion regulation and dysregulation, measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 5. Trait emotion regulation is calculated as an average of all items.
Trait emotion regulation ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater regulation of emotions and lower scores indicating a dysregulation of emotions; will also be used as covariate or moderator
|
Up to three months post-intervention
|
Mean change in Trait Equanimity assessed via Self-Report
Time Frame: Up to three months post-intervention
|
Trait balanced mental attitude, measured using self-report items with Likert scale from 1 to 5. Trait equanimity is calculated as an average of all items.
Trait equanimity ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating a greater balanced mental attitude; will also be used as covariate or moderator
|
Up to three months post-intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Brian Galla, PhD, University of Pittsburgh
- Principal Investigator: Timothy Nokes-Malach, PhD, University of Pittsburgh
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 26, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 7, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
December 31, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 8, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 8, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
October 19, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
January 9, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 6, 2023
Last Verified
January 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY19050258 Part 1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Yes
IPD Plan Description
Deidentified data required to reproduce results reported in publications will be available to researchers.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data and analytic code will be shared upon publication.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Data and analytic code will be shared on Open Science Framework (or other online repository)
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- Analytic Code
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stress
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompletedStress | Emotional Stress | Psychological Stress | Social Stress | Life StressUnited States
-
University of PadovaRecruitingStress | Stress Disorder | Work Related StressItaly
-
University of California, Los AngelesUniversity of California, San Francisco; Stanford University; California Initiative...Enrolling by invitationStress | Stress, Psychological | Stress, Emotional | Stress, Physiological | Stress ReactionUnited States
-
Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteEnrolling by invitationStress | Post Traumatic Stress Disorder | Work Related StressUnited States
-
Duquesne UniversityUniversity of California, San Diego; West Penn Allegheny Health System; El Centro... and other collaboratorsTerminated
-
University of Sao PauloCompleted
-
Royal Cornwall Hospitals TrustEnrolling by invitationStress | Stress, Psychological | Stress, JobUnited Kingdom
-
Syracuse VA Medical CenterUS Department of Veterans AffairsCompletedEmotional Stress | Psychological Stress | Life StressUnited States
-
Northumbria UniversityVolac International LtdNot yet recruitingStress | Mood | Physiological Stress
-
Taichung Veterans General HospitalUnknown
Clinical Trials on Mindfulness Training
-
University of California, San DiegoCompleted
-
Yale UniversityCompletedMental Health Issue (E.G., Depression, Psychosis, Personality Disorder, Substance Abuse) | Mental Health Wellness 1 | War-Related TraumaJordan
-
King's College LondonNot yet recruitingAdults With Overweight and Obesity
-
University of HoustonCompletedDepression | Stress | Anxiety | Well-beingUnited States
-
The Miriam HospitalCompleted
-
Boston University Charles River CampusTerminatedSmoking CessationUnited States
-
Freie Universität BerlinCharite University, Berlin, GermanyCompletedMajor Depressive Disorder
-
Alexandria UniversityRecruiting
-
University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignCompletedMental Health Wellness | MindfulnessUnited States