Maintaining Mechanisms of Chronic Depression and Their Changeability (GetWell)

June 15, 2016 updated by: Thorsten Barnhofer, Freie Universität Berlin

Maintaining Mechanisms of Chronic Depression and Their Changeability: the Role of Discrepancy-based Processing

Despite considerable progress in the understanding of depression, the treatment of those who have entered a chronic course of the disorder still represents a major challenge. In order to develop more effective interventions it is important to learn more about maintaining mechanisms and the ways in which these can be addressed. Recent research has outlined aberrations in neurophysiological parameters that may serve as risk factors underlying tendencies to engage in maladaptive responses to negative mood, and that may be particularly pronounced in patients with chronic depression. Initial evidence suggests that such deficits may not be easily amenable through established treatments. The current study investigated whether mental training using mindfulness mediation, as compared to an active control training, could alter these parameters in chronically depressed patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Persistent engagement in maladaptive patterns of thinking is a hallmark of depression. In those who suffer from a chronic course of the disorders, tendencies towards engagement in such patterns of thinking are likely to have become habitual and automatic in nature. Recent research has begun to elucidate potential cognitive and neurophysiological bases of such persistence. There is evidence that depressed patients show significant deficits in performance monitoring (Weinberg, Dieterich, & Riesel, 2015). Research on error-related negativity (ERN), a signal that occurs briefly after commission of an error, has reported significant aberrations in depressed suggesting deficits at the early stages of processing discrepancies. Deficits in ERN have been suggested to serve as an endophenotype for depression and psychopathology more generally (Manoach & Agam, 2013). Preliminary findings suggest that deficits remain even when symptoms are reduced following established treatments. Similarly, there is evidence for increased tendencies to elaborate negative information as evidenced by stronger late positive potentials (LPP; Auerbach, Stanton, Proudfit, & Pizzagalli, 2015) and an increased rigidity of spontaneous activity of the brain during rest as indicated by increased long-range temporal correlations of spontaneous brain oscillations (LRTC; Bornas et al., 2013).

Interventions using mental training may be particularly suited to address these aberrations. Indeed even brief training in mindfulness has been found to have significant neuroplastic effects (Tang et al., 2010) The aim of the current study was therefore to investigate the effects of a brief intervention using training in mindfulness meditation on the above listed parameters. Chronically depressed patients were randomly allocated to receive either a two-week mindfulness training or a resting control training. EEG was measured before and after the intervention along with self-reports of current symptoms and resilience/vulnerability factors. We expected the mindfulness training to have significantly stronger effects on ERN, LPP, and LRTC than the resting control training.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

74

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a current diagnosis of Major Depression as assessed by Structured Clinical Interview for DSM IV (First, Spitzer, Gibbon, & Williams, 2002)
  • a lifetime history of depression with onset before age 19 and either chronic persistence of symptoms or a history of at least three previous episodes of depression, two of which needed to have occurred during the last two years
  • self-reported severity of current symptoms on a clinical level as indicated by Beck Depression Inventory-II (Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996) scores above 19
  • age 25 to 60 thus excluding cases of late-onset depression, and e) fluency in spoken and written German.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of psychosis or mania, current eating disorder, OCD, current self-harm, current substance abuse or dependence
  • history of traumatic brain injury
  • current treatment with CBT
  • We allowed patients who were currently taking antidepressants into the study provided that the medication had not been changed during the last four weeks before entry into the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Brief Mindfulness Training
The brief mindfulness training comprised of three 1.5-hour weekly individual sessions and included intensive daily home practice. Participants were asked to engage in formal meditation practice for about 25 minutes twice per day on six out of seven days of each week using recorded guided meditations. Practices were shorter in duration than the practices in Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT, Segal et al., 2002) in order to allow for more flexibility in scheduling the practices, but followed the standard sequence of mindfulness-based interventions.
Brief mindfulness training comprising of three weekly individual sessions and daily guided meditation home practice
Other Names:
  • Mindfulness Intervention
Active Comparator: Resting Control Training
The resting control training comprised of three 1.5-hour weekly individual sessions and included intensive daily home practice. Participants were asked to schedule regular rest periods as a means of deliberately retreating from the activities of the day. Length and frequency of the rest periods mirrored the time demands of the meditation training. Participants received a plausible rationale for the control training that linked acute depression to stress and suggested rest, relaxation, and disengagement from negative thinking as an initial and preliminary step towards recovery.
Brief resting control training comprising of three weekly individual sessions and daily home practice consisting of resting periods
Other Names:
  • Resting Control

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Error-related negativity
Time Frame: Two weeks
Event-related potential (EEG)
Two weeks
Long-range temporal correlations of theta oscillations in resting EEG
Time Frame: Two weeks
Resting EEG
Two weeks
Late positive potentials
Time Frame: Two weeks
Event-related potential (EEG)
Two weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Levels of state mindfulness
Time Frame: Two weeks
Self-report
Two weeks
Interoceptive awareness
Time Frame: Two weeks
Self-report
Two weeks
Levels of depressive symptoms
Time Frame: Two weeks
Self-report
Two weeks
Ruminative tendencies
Time Frame: Two weeks
Self-report
Two weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thorsten Barnhofer, PhD, Freie Universität Berlin

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 16, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 16, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2016

Last Verified

June 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Major Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on Brief Mindfulness Training

3
Subscribe