An RCT of a Telemedicine Intervention for Hypokinetic Dysarthria in PD

December 16, 2025 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development
Nearly 90% of people with Parkinson's disease have speech and voice disorders that negatively impact their ability to communicate effectively in daily life. This study will test the hypothesis that a combined speech and exercise intervention will improve speech intelligibility in people with Parkinson's disease and speech impairment. This approach would offer an affordable way to continue to both instruct and encourage training by Veterans virtually indefinitely through the remote access technology. These findings may help VA clinicians provide optimal care for the many Veterans with Parkinson's disease and speech impairment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background/Rationale The great majority of individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) develop speech impairments, most of which are grouped together and called hypokinetic dysarthria. Hypokinetic dysarthria is typically characterized by altered prosody (e.g., reduced loudness and pitch variation), phonation (e.g., breathy or harsh voice), and articulation (e.g., imprecise consonants, centralized vowels). Changes in speech may appear early in PD and progress in severity over time. Further, such changes in speech lead to significant declines in functional communication and quality of life. Pharmacological and surgical interventions that alleviate motor symptoms in PD are largely ineffective or sometimes even detrimental for speech.

Objectives Based on results from a preliminary study, the investigators propose to conduct a pilot randomized, controlled trial in patients with hypokinetic dysarthria in PD to assess the potential effectiveness of a novel home-based exercise intervention with interactive automated speech response features that encourage a higher level of speech performance. The investigators hypothesize that patients in the intervention program will improve in speech intelligibility and self-perceived communication ability over 6 months, as compared with patients in a health education program.

Methods A total of 104 community-dwelling Veterans with hypokinetic dysarthria in mild-to-moderate PD will be randomly assigned to the exercise intervention or to the health education control. The investigators will test the effects of the intervention at 6 months for the outcomes speech intelligibility and self-perceived communication ability.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

104

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02130-4817
        • VA Boston Healthcare System Jamaica Plain Campus, Jamaica Plain, MA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

36 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Physician diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD)
  • At least 2 of the 3 cardinal signs of PD (resting tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia)
  • Response to dopaminergic medication
  • Hypokinetic dysarthria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Angina pectoris
  • History of myocardial infarction (MI) within 6 months
  • History of ventricular dysrhythmia requiring current therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group
Health education
Provision of general information about a variety of topics
Experimental: Combined speech and exercise intervention
Home-based exercise intervention with interactive automated speech response features that encourage a higher level of speech performance.
Home-based exercise intervention with interactive automated speech response features

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Speech Intelligibility at 6 Months
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-month Follow-up
Speech intelligibility is the degree to which spoken language can be understood by a listener. It is measured by the percentage of words that are understood from a recording of a participant reading a random set of 11 sentences from the Assessment of Intelligibility in Dysarthric Speech Sentence Intelligibility Test stimulus bank. Native speakers of American English listened to these recordings to assess speech intelligibility. These listeners were between the ages of 18 and 35 with no history of speech, language, or hearing disorders or experience rating speech. Each listener was provided with one sentence from each study participant's recording. Listeners were asked to transcribe each sentence to the best of their ability. Their transcriptions were compared with the actual sentences to calculate the percentage of words that were understood. Possible scores range from 0 (no words understood) to 100 (all words understood). Change = (6-month score - Baseline score)
Baseline and 6-month Follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in in Self-perceived Communication Ability Measured Via the Communication Effectiveness Index (CETI-M) at 6 Months
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-month Follow-up

CETI-M is a self-reported instrument assessing participants' communicative effectiveness in 10 different speaking situations (e.g., in noisy environments; over the phone) on a 10-point Likert scale, where 1 = not effective and 10 = extremely effective. Possible scores range from 10 (worst rated effectiveness) to 100 (best rated effectiveness).

Change = (6-month score - Baseline score)

Baseline and 6-month Follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David W Sparrow, DSc, VA Boston Healthcare System Jamaica Plain Campus, Jamaica Plain, MA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe