- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04642599
Bimanual Motor Skill Learning Through Robotics in Chronic Cerebellar Stroke Survivors and Healthy Individuals
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Over 3 consecutive days, healthy individuals and chronic cerebellar stroke patients (1) will be evaluated and (2) will train on the neurorehabilitation robot REAplan®.
They will practice several tasks on the robot REAplan® (bimanual version), requiring either movements with the affected arm (unimanual tasks) or complex, coordinated movements with both arms (bimanual tasks).
In addition, several "classical" clinical scales and tests will be used to evaluate overall motor-sensory-cognitive functions (clinical tests, questionnaires, ...).
Hand/digits motor function will be also evaluated with the kinetic device DexTrain®.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Namur
-
Yvoir, Namur, Belgium, 5530
- CHU UCL Namur, Mont-Godinne, Neurology Department, Stroke Unit
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
STROKE PATIENTS:
Inclusion Criteria:
- having a chronic cerebellar stroke (>6 months)
- aged 18-90 years
- with a demonstrated stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) lesion on brain imaging
Exclusion Criteria:
- difficulty in understanding or executing commands
- drug/alcohol abuse
- severe aphasia / cognitive deficits interfering with study
- inability to voluntarily move the affected arm (i.e. complete paralysis of the arm)
- multiple strokes / dementia / psychiatric condition
HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS:
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18-90 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- neurological conditions interfering with the study
- drug/alcohol abuse
- pyschiatric condition
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Chronic Cerebellar Stroke
Participants with a chronic cerebellar stroke
|
REAplan® rehabilitation robot: training to perform complex, coordinated, bimanual movements
|
|
Active Comparator: Healthy Individuals (Controls)
healthy participants
|
REAplan® rehabilitation robot: training to perform complex, coordinated, bimanual movements
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in bi-SAT
Time Frame: Change between day 1 to 3
|
Bimanual Speed/Accuracy Trade-off measured by the REAplan robot bimanual Speed/Accuracy Trade-off: mathematical computation of the relationship bewteen speed and accuracy
|
Change between day 1 to 3
|
|
Change in bi-CO
Time Frame: Change between day 1 to 3
|
Bimanual Coordination factor measured by the REAplan robot bimanual Coordination factor : mathematical measure of the phase coherence between velocities of both arms
|
Change between day 1 to 3
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
bi-SAT
Time Frame: Day 1 + day 3
|
On bimanual REACHING (REAplan robot) bimanual Speed/Accurady Trade-off: mathematical computation of the relationship
|
Day 1 + day 3
|
|
bi-CO
Time Frame: Day 1 + day 3
|
On bimanual REACHING (REAplan robot) bimanual Coordination factor: mathematical measure of the phase coherence between velocities of both arms
|
Day 1 + day 3
|
|
change in bi-Force
Time Frame: Change between day 1 to 3
|
Bimanual forces : forces exerted in the wrong direction by each arm (Newtons)
|
Change between day 1 to 3
|
|
bi-Force
Time Frame: Day 1 + day 3
|
On bimanual REACHING (REAplan robot) bimanual forces : forces exerted in the wrong direction by each arm (Newtons) |
Day 1 + day 3
|
|
bi-smoothness
Time Frame: Day 1+ day 3
|
On bimanual REACHING (REAplan robot) Smoothness of movement : Spectral Arc Length (SPARC)
|
Day 1+ day 3
|
|
bi-error
Time Frame: Day 1 + day 3
|
on bimanual REACHING (REAplan robot) Error in centimeters or degrees during bimanual reaching
|
Day 1 + day 3
|
|
Dextrain
Time Frame: Day 1 + day 3
|
Kinetic device measuring the movements of each finger: error and co-activation (percentage)
|
Day 1 + day 3
|
|
Dextrain
Time Frame: Day 1 + day 3
|
Kinetic device measuring the movements of each finger: speed (milliseconds)
|
Day 1 + day 3
|
|
Dextrain
Time Frame: Day 1 + day 3
|
Kinetic device measuring the movements of each finger: force (Newton)
|
Day 1 + day 3
|
|
BBT
Time Frame: Day 1 + day 3
|
Box & Blocks Test (timed transfert of blocks from one space to the other)
|
Day 1 + day 3
|
|
Modified International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (MICARS)
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Ataxia scale A high score describes strong ataxia and a low score describes weak ataxia
|
Day 1
|
|
Fugl Meyer Upper extremity test
Time Frame: Day 2
|
Tests impairments of the upper limb after stroke
|
Day 2
|
|
Corsi block
Time Frame: Day 2
|
Tests the visuo-spatial memory
|
Day 2
|
|
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: Day 2
|
Tests the short-term memory, visuospatial skills, executive functions, attention, concentration, working memory, language and orientation in time and space
|
Day 2
|
|
Abilhand and activlim
Time Frame: Day 3
|
Questionnaire about the bimanual hability during activities of the daily life
|
Day 3
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Yves Vandermeeren, MD, PhD, University Hospital of Mont-Godinne
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Yeganeh Doost M, Orban de Xivry JJ, Bihin B, Vandermeeren Y. Two Processes in Early Bimanual Motor Skill Learning. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Dec 20;11:618. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00618. eCollection 2017.
- Doost MY, Orban de Xivry JJ, Herman B, Vanthournhout L, Riga A, Bihin B, Jamart J, Laloux P, Raymackers JM, Vandermeeren Y. Learning a Bimanual Cooperative Skill in Chronic Stroke Under Noninvasive Brain Stimulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019 Jun;33(6):486-498. doi: 10.1177/1545968319847963. Epub 2019 May 15.
- Dehem S, Gilliaux M, Lejeune T, Delaunois E, Mbonda P, Vandermeeren Y, Detrembleur C, Stoquart G. Effectiveness of a single session of dual-transcranial direct current stimulation in combination with upper limb robotic-assisted rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study. Int J Rehabil Res. 2018 Jun;41(2):138-145. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000274.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- BimMSkL-Cerebellum
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.