Use of "iSuite" During CMR-guided Electrophysiological Procedures

February 2, 2023 updated by: S.M. Chaldoupi, Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht

Prospective Use of Philips "iSuite" Electroanatomical Mapping System in Addition to Standard CMR-guided Electrophysiological Procedures

The perpuse of this study is to investigate the feasibility of the Philips interventional MRI suite "iSuite" to create an electroanatomical map of the heart based on which the real-time location of the catheters can be correctly and reliably visualized during CMR-guided electrophysiological procedure (CMR-EP).

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Limburg
      • Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands, 6202 AZ
        • Recruiting
        • Maastricht UMC+
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • K Vernooy, Prof. dr.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • G.P Bijvoet, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • R.J Holtackers, Ir
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • S.J.M. van Kuijk, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • J.E Wildberger, Prof. dr.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study will include all eligible patients who are already scheduled and thus eligible for CMR-guided electrophysiological procedure for the treatment of a cardiac rhythm disturbance in the MUMC+, albeit meeting the in- and exclusion criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Already scheduled by the treating electrophysiologist for CMR-EP as standard care for the treatment of a cardiac arrhythmia.
  • Minimum age of 18 years old.
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in another investigational study that has not reached its primary endpoint.
  • Contraindication for MRI such as: metallic implant, body weight > 130 kg, pregnancy, breast feeding women, known severe allergy to gadolineum contrast agents, renal failure with eGFR ≤ 30 mL/min/1,73m2.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The feasibility of iSuite to create an electroanatomical map (EAM) of the heart during CMR-EP
Time Frame: Periprocedural
To establish whether the visualization by iSuite is correct we will compare the location visualized by the EAM with the reference images as produced by the default cine MRI sequences at the target ablation location just prior to the RF ablation. The definition of correct visualization is: good agreement between the two modalities (EAM and cine MRI) based on visual assessment of the treating electrophysiologist and the supervising CMR expert. When no consensus is reached than the visualization is coded 'incorrect'. This outcome will be dichotomized and coded as 'correct visualization' or 'incorrect visualization'. This categorical variable will be expressed as counts and proportion with 95% confidence interval (CI).
Periprocedural

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedural success as measured by electrical and anatomical confirmation of a complete ablation lesion at the end of the procedure:
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Anatomical confirmation of a complete ablation lesion is defined as a continuous line of high signal intensity at the target location on the edema and fibrosis sequences of the CMR at the end of the procedure. This anatomical confirmation will be judged by the CMR expert that is present during the procedure and thus will not be blinded to the EP results. Procedural success and procedural complications will be reported as count and proportion with 95% CI.
Periprocedural
Procedural time
Time Frame: Periprocedural
To investigate the procedure-by-procedure change in procedural times and total amount of CMR images needed until application of the first ablation lesion
Periprocedural
Complication rate
Time Frame: Periprocedural
To investigate the complication rate of CMR-EP with the integration of iSuite.
Periprocedural

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: S.M. Chaldoupi, Maastricht UMC+
  • Principal Investigator: Casper Mihl, Maastricht UMC+
  • Study Chair: J.E Wildberger, Prof. Dr, Maastricht UMC+

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 4, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NL74812.068.20
  • METC20-064 (Other Identifier: METC azM/UM)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

This is a small scale single center study and there is no plan to share IPD in order to ensure participant privacy, and the risk of invalid analysis. Data will be registered in the Castor EDC database by the investigator, after patient data has been anonymized. The principal investigator and involved investigators of the research team will have access to the source data and safeguard the code. The handling of personal data will comply with the General Data Protection Regulation and the Dutch Act on Implementation of the General Protection Regulation. Data and the key to the unique patient study number will be kept for 15 years after study end. During this single centre study, no data will be shared or transferred. Once the study has ended, we will ensure that all data are managed and securely stored. Data will be available for use in future research on cardiac arrhythmia. Qualified monitors of Clinical Trial Centre Maastricht will independently perform monitoring of the study.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Arrhythmia

Clinical Trials on Philips interventional MRI suite (Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands)

Subscribe