Atropine vs Isoprenaline in the Invasive Diagnosis of Arrhythmias

October 9, 2023 updated by: Medical University of Lodz

Comparison of the Clinical Utility of Atropine and Isoprenaline in the Invasive Diagnosis of Arrhythmias

During electrophysiological study (EPS) multiple drugs are used to reveal arrhythmias and/or conductive system disorders. Two most often used agents are atropine and isoprenaline. Due to their distinct pharmacological properties, they are affecting myocardium in different manner. Those dissimilarities can affect the EPS course and long-term prognosis. The aim of presented study is to evaluate the optimal protocol of pharmacotherapy during EPS.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Electrophysiological study (EPS) is essential tool for heart rhythm disorders diagnostic. Inducibility of arrhythmia before ablation to confirm the diagnosis and inability to do so after the procedure is crucial for long-term success. Multiple drugs are used to reveal arrhythmias and/or conductive system disorders. Two most often used are atropine and isoprenaline. Atropine is a natural, selective antagonist of cholinergic receptors M1 and M2. It reverses the inhibitory effect of vagal nerve on myocardium. This improves sinus node automatism and conduction in atrioventricular node. Isoprenaline is a preferential agonist of beta-1-adrenergic receptors. It has bathmotropic and chronotropic effect. During daily clinical practice those two drugs are often used interchangeably. However, differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics may affect the results. There are lack of data directly comparing those two agents. There are isolated evidences that arrhythmia inducibility rate after the ablation differs between those two drugs. This may lead to the misconception of ablation as successful. The aim of presented study is to evaluate the optimal protocol of pharmacotherapy during EPS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Lodz, Poland, 93-216
        • Department of Electrocardiology Medical University of Lodz

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with indication for electrophysiological study according to present guidelines of European Society of Cardiology

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not willing or incapable to give written informed consent.
  • Previous diagnosed ventricle tachycardia or fibrillation
  • Previous diagnosed atrial fibrillation or flutter
  • Glaucoma (contraindication for atropine)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Atropine
Patients in whom during electrophysiological study atropine will be used. I.v. bolus of 0.01 mg/kg b.w. will be administered to reach the increase of heart rate of 25% or up to 130/min. If necessary, dose will be increased every 5 minutes until mention above parameters are achieved. Maximum dose will be 0.4 mg/kg b.w.
Comparison of heart conductive system and arrhythmia inducibility after using atropine or isoprenaline
Active Comparator: Isoprenaline
Patients in whom during electrophysiological study isoprenaline will be used. Continuous i.v. infusion of 0.01 mcg/kg b.w./min will be administered to reach the increase of heart rate of 25% or up to 130/min. If necessary, dose will be doubled every 5 minutes until mention above parameters are achieved. Maximum dose will be 20 mcg/min.
Comparison of heart conductive system and arrhythmia inducibility after using atropine or isoprenaline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of sino-atrial conduction time
Time Frame: During the procedure
Sino-atrial conduction time (ms) during programed atrial stimulation will be assessed to examine the function of sinus node.
During the procedure
Evaluation of sinus node recovery time
Time Frame: During the procedure
Sinus node recovery time (ms) during programed atrial stimulation will be assessed to examine the function of sinus node.
During the procedure
Evaluation of anterograde atrioventricular conduction
Time Frame: During the procedure
Anterograde Wenkebach point (ms) and effective refractory period of atrioventricular node (ms) during programed atrial stimulation will be assessed.
During the procedure
Evaluation of retrograde atrioventricular conduction
Time Frame: During the procedure
Retrograde Wenkebach point (ms) and effective refractory period of atrioventricular node (ms) during programed ventricular stimulation will be assessed.
During the procedure
Arrhythmia inducibility
Time Frame: During the procedure
Inducibility of anticipated arrythmia before and after drug administration and after eventual ablation.
During the procedure
Long-term success rate
Time Frame: 12 months
Recurrence of clinical arrhythmia during 12 months of observation
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of adverse events during the electrophysiological study.
Time Frame: During the procedure
Analysis of adverse events during the electrophysiological study according to used drug. Adverse events includes: death, stroke, cardiogenic shock, anaphylaxis, myocardial infarction, electric storm.
During the procedure
Incidence of adverse events during the 12-month follow up.
Time Frame: 12 months
Analysis of adverse events during the 12-month follow up according to used drug. Adverse events includes: death, stroke, cardiogenic shock, anaphylaxis, myocardial infarction, electric storm.
12 months
Length of the procedure
Time Frame: During the procedure
Analysis of the whole procedure time according to used drug.
During the procedure
Procedure time form drug administration till the end.
Time Frame: During the procedure
Analysis of the procedure time form atropine/isoprenaline administration till the end.
During the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

November 9, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Arrhythmia

Clinical Trials on Comparison of atropine and isoprenaline

Subscribe