Evaluation of the Psychosocial Impact on Health Professionals Exposed During COVID 19 Coronavirus Pandemic

Evaluation of the Psychosocial Impact on Health Professionals Exposed During the COVID 19 Coronavirus Pandemic

Application of a survey in electronic support to hospital professionals. This survey will include different demographics as well as questions from own elaboration about the different aspects related to the development of work during the health emergency. A third part will be included different validated scales for screening / diagnosis of different problems that can present those who are working in the Current situation. The different scales are the PHQ-9, GAD 7, ISI, and EIE-R. These scales address the different problems that have been seen that can introduce professionals, Depression, Anxiety, Insomnia and adaptation to stressors.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain, 08041
        • Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population is made up of workers from the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Workers during COVID 19 pandemic at Hospital de la Creu i Sant Pau

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No Exclusion Criteria, only the negative to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Exposed Workers
Workers who have been exposed during COVID 19 pandemic.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
General Anxiety Disorder (GAD7) score.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

This instrument has been created to serve as a screening in anxiety disorder widespread. It is composed of 7 Likert-type response items from 0 to 3 that include the symptoms and the disability associated with the disorder.7 For its correction, a total score is obtained from the sum of scores of all the items, which can range from 0 to 21.

There are no established cut-off points for the Spanish version. In the original version, the authors propose a cut-off point of greater than or equal to 10. The version validated for the Spanish population will be used.

Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Insomnia severity Index (ISI)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

The investigators will use the adaptation of Fernández Mendoza et al. It is made up of 7 items that evaluate the nature, severity and impact of insomnia. It is answered with a Likert-type scale that goes from 0 to 4, taking into account the last month.

For its correction, a total score is obtained that ranges between 0 and 28. The proposed cut-off points of the original version are:

  • 0-7: no insomnia
  • 8-14: insomnia below the threshold
  • 15-21: clinical insomnia of moderate severity
  • 22-28: severe clinical insomnia
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Patient Health Questionaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

This instrument is intended to aid the diagnosis of depression through the DSM-IV criteria, and to determine the severity of said disorder. It can also be used to observe the changes experienced by patients over time.

It is made up of 9 items with Likert-type responses with values between 0 and 3 that refer to the last two weeks.

For its correction, a total score is obtained that ranges between 0 and 27. The proposed cut-off points are:

  • 1-4: minimal depression
  • 5-9: mild depression
  • 10-14: moderate depression
  • 15-19: moderately severe depression
  • 20-27: severe depression The version validated for the Spanish population will be used
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

The Perceived Stress Scale provides an overall measure of perceived stress in the last month evaluating the degree to which life situations are valued as stressful by people. 12 Specifically: the degree of subjective control over unpredictable or unexpected situations and the discomfort that accompanies the perceived lack of control. Originally it consists of 14 items (some of which are formulated in negative).

Two dimensions have been considered (control and loss of control) although more restrictive criteria would require considering the one-dimensionality of the scale.

The validated Spanish version will be used.

Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Impact of Event Scale Revised (IES-R)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
This scale is conceptually based on Horowitz's two-factor theory and assesses the subjective discomfort that accompanies traumatic experiences. It is a self-administered scale, and consists of 22 items in the revised version. 7 items value intrusion 8 avoidance and 7 hyperactivation. The investigators will evaluate the post-traumatic stress symptomatology, and for that, the revised version in Spanish will be used.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

February 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Subscribe