ACE2 Gender Differences in Stroke With COVID-19 (ACEGENDER)

July 17, 2023 updated by: Irene Giovanna Aprile, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus

Gender Differences in Stroke With COVID-19: Epigenetic and Biochemical Study of ACE2 Receptor and Relationship With Rehabilitative Outcome

The new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, causes the COVID-19 infection, which showed a form of neurovirulence involving the Central and peripheral Nervous Systems [Baig et al, 2020]. In a mouse model for human ACE2 expression, the virus entered the brain mainly through the olfactory bulb pathway [Netland et al, 2008], with an encephalic invasion uniformly lethal even with low viral doses and without lung involvement. The death of the animal was reasonably related to neuronal dysfunction/death in cardiorespiratory bone marrow centers, while the absence of ACE2 prevented severe encephalopathy.

Men has a highly frequency of severe and lethal COVID-19, and the observed gender difference could be related to the regulation of ACE2 receptor expression.

The ACE2 gene is encoded by a region of the X chromosome that escapes inactivation, so that women have an increased expression of this protein. The process of inactivation of the X chromosome includes DNA methylation with a decrease in the expression of genes that are affected by methylation. In This way an epigenetic mechanism could modulate the expression of ACE2 in a gender-specific way determining its levels and consequently its protective role.

Also in this regulatory context of ACE2 expression the role of microRNA (miRNA) could be very important. In fact, the untranslated 3' region (UTR) of ACE2 presents a binding sequence for miRNA miR-200c-3p that has been found at high levels of expression in cellular models infected with H5N1 influenza virus [Liu et al, 2017].

In addition, high plasma levels of miR-200c-3p were found in patients with severe pneumonia while ACE2 was reduced suggesting a regulatory role of this miRNA in ACE2 receptor expression [Liu et al, 2017]. Deficiency of 25 (OH)D is common among elderly and obese men (during winter and spring), highlighting the sex-specific difference observed in COVID-19 infection [La Vignera et al, 2020]. This vitamin, envolved in physical recovery [Siotto et al, 2019], and in the pathway of the renin angiotensin system, seems important to be assessed in ex-COVID-19 patients with stroke outcomes in admission and at the end of the rehabilitation process.

The study will consist in:

  • Epigenetic study: evaluation of methylation of ACE2 promoter and miR-200c-3p levels.
  • Biochemical analysis: the evaluation of levels of angiotensin II, ACE2 and Vitamin D.
  • Correlation between rehabilitative outcome and biological markers

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A new coronavirus was identified in December 2019 in Wuhan, China as the causative agent of "Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome" (SARS-CoV-2), a viral lung infection indicated by the acronym COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019). By the end of January 2020, this rapidly spreading virus had already infected more than 100,000 people in several countries, leading the World Health Organization to declare a "global emergency" [Wu et al 2020]. The clinical manifestations of COVID-19 can vary from the common cold to more serious lung diseases such as those observed in the "Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome" (SARS) of 2002-2003 and the "Middle East Respiratory Syndrome" (MERS) of 2011.

The Sars-Cov2 virus, like other RNA viruses, also showed a form of neurovirulence with consequent involvement in some patients of the Central Nervous System (CNS) and Peripheral Nervous System (SNP) [Baig et al, 2020].

Neurological symptoms in patients with COVID-19 infection fall into three categories:

  1. neurological expressions of the symptoms of the underlying disease (headache, dizziness, dysfunction of consciousness, ataxia, epileptic manifestations and stroke)
  2. symptoms of neuro-peripheral origin (hypo-ageusia, hyposmia, neuralgia);
  3. symptoms of skeletal muscle damage, often associated with liver and kidney damage.

The first data on COVID-19 infection are in favor of neurological involvement in a variable percentage of cases with particular expression in more severe patients [Mao et al, 2020]. According to some authors, involvement of the nervous system may be partly responsible for respiratory impairment [Yan-Chao et al, 2020].

It should be noted that in the case of SARS-CoV infection, in a mouse model for human ACE2 expression, the virus had entered the brain mainly through the olfactory bulb pathway [Netland et al, 2008]. Encephalic invasion was uniformly lethal with further evidence that brain inoculation with low viral doses could be lethal even without lung involvement. The death of the animal was reasonably related to neuronal dysfunction/death in cardiorespiratory bone marrow centers and the histopathological picture was characterized by a minimal cellular infiltrate in the brain supporting the hypothesis of a transsynaptic viral dissemination. The absence of ACE2 prevented severe encephalopathy in the animal model. The structures selectively affected by neuronal death were the dorsal vagal complex (nucleus of the solitary tract, postremactic area, dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus).

On the other hand, trans-nasal invasion selectively interfered with thalamic, hypothalamic, amygdala nuclei. Some affected nuclei had no explanation in the connection (e.g. cochlear nuclei). The invoked mechanism of neuronal loss was that of a "flock" of cytokines (IL-6).

CNS/SNP and muscle involvement is present in COVID-19 patients and a careful interpretation of them is desirable. The hyposmia reported suggests a nasal infection route with direct access to the CNS. This pathway could be alternative to the respiratory and intestinal pathways and theoretically it could occur, as in some cases of SARS-COV, with mainly neurological symptoms.

Recently it has been reported that symptoms of corticospinal tract impairment have been observed in 67% of patients [Helms et al, 2020].

The epidemiological data collected so far indicate a substantial difference between men and women in clinical manifestations and SARS-CoV-2 infections. Specifically, a mortality rate among men has been found to be 73% in China [Chen et al, 2020], 59% in South Korea [Korean society of infectious disease, 2020] and 70% in Italy as reported by the Higher Institute of Health (ISS). In addition, the mortality rate is very dependent on the presence of comorbidities. In fact, in 45000 Chinese patients positive for COVID-19 the mortality rate went from 0.9% in those patients without comorbidity to 10.5%, 7.3% and 6.3% in those with cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus and hypertension, respectively [Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia Emergency Response Epidemiology Team, 2020].

In Italy, data provided by the ISS have documented a percentage of deaths around 2.1% in patients without comorbidity, a percentage that increases to 21.3%, 25.9% and 50.7% in those patients with one, two and three comorbidities, respectively.

Thus the gender and presence of comorbidities have been identified as key factors in the evolution of COVID-19.

In addition to pre-existing comorbidities, which, as already reported, are almost always present in patients with severe and lethal COVID-19 with greater frequency in men, the biological mechanisms are to be considered the main responsible for the observed gender difference.

A hypothesis that attempts to explain all these epidiemological data is based on the regulation of ACE2 receptor expression (Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2).

ACE2 is an enzyme that degrades angiontensin II by generating angiotensin (1-7) which plays a protective role against damage caused by infection, inflammation and stress [Vickers et al, 2002; Zisman et al, 2003].

The SARS-CoV-2 virus penetrates the target cells of the respiratory system through the binding of its surface S protein (spike protein) to the ACE2 receptor reducing its expression.

In this way there is also a decrease in angiotensin levels (1-7) resulting in increased hypertension and lung failure [Gurwitz et al, 2020].

Therefore, it is important to consider the expression of ACE2 in those patients with hypertension, heart disease or diabetes when evaluating the different mortality rate in patients with these comorbidities.

In addition, gender-specific mortality could be precisely related to modulation of ACE2 expression. In fact, estrogens induce an increase in ACE2 receptor expression, suggesting that, at least in women of childbearing age, even after infection, this enzyme is able to perform its protective function, particularly towards the lungs. In men, it seems that androgenic hormones play a pathogenetic role in modulating the expression of cellular enzymes such as serine protease TMPSSR2, involved in the phases following the attack of the virus on the receptor, i.e. in the viral entry, promoting the spread of the infection in lung cells.

The ACE2 gene is encoded by a region of the X chromosome that escapes inactivation, thus supporting the hypothesis of an increased expression of this protein in women who would have the advantage of being protected from the complications and fatalities of COVID-19 infection.

The process of inactivation of the X chromosome includes DNA methylation and as a result there is a decrease in the expression of those genes that are affected by methylation. In This way an epigenetic mechanism could modulate the expression of ACE2 in a gender-specific way determining its levels and consequently its protective role.

Also in this regulatory context of ACE2 expression the role of microRNA (miRNA) could be very important. In fact, the untranslated 3' region (UTR) of ACE2 presents a binding sequence for miRNA miR-200c-3p that has been found at high levels of expression in cellular models infected with H5N1 influenza virus [Liu et al, 2017].

In addition, high plasma levels of miR-200c-3p were found in patients with severe pneumonia while ACE2 was reduced suggesting a regulatory role of this miRNA in ACE2 receptor expression [Liu et al, 2017].

Vitamin D reduces the risk of viral infections, especially respiratory infections as described in literature [Martineau et al, 2016; Gruber-Bzura et al, 2018; Gombart et al, 2020; Grant et al, 2020]. In fact, Vitamin D increases cellular immunity by reducing circulating cytokines induced by the innate immune system in response to viral infections [Huang et al, 2020].

Vitamin D deficiency or deficiency contributes to acute respiratory syndrome in which mortality increases with age and chronic comorbidities [Vásárhelyi et al, 2011]. This vitamin is a prohormone that has been shown to attenuate acute lipopolysaccharide-induced lung damage in mice by regulating the expression of components of the renin angiotensin system including ACE and ACE2, renin and angiotensin III [Xu J, 2017; Tsujino et al, 2019]. In these two months different research groups strongly suggested the need for an analysis on the correlations between vitamin D levels and COVID-19 infections [Tian et al, 2020; Panarese et al, 2020; Marik et al, 2020]. Serum concentrations of Vitamin D (25 (OH)D) tend to decrease with age, which may be determinant in COVID-19 infection due to case fatality rates (CFR) that increase with age.

Reasons include less time spent in the sun and reduced vitamin D production as a result of lower levels of 7-dehydrocholesterol in the skin [Siotto et al, 2019]. In addition, it has been pointed out that deficiency of 25 (OH)D is particularly common among elderly and obese men (post-menopausal women tend to control levels through Vitamin D supplements) especially during winter and spring, highlighting the sex-specific difference observed in COVID-19 infection [La Vignera et al, 2020].

Considering the importance of this vitamin also in physical recovery [Siotto et al, 2019], in addition to its role in the pathway of the renin angiotensin system, it seems important to assess serum levels in ex-COVID-19 patients with stroke outcomes in admission and at the end of the rehabilitation process.

In summary, epidemiological data collected in recent months in different countries around the world have shown how gender differences and the presence of comorbidities affect the mortality rate due to COVID-19. Our hypothesis is that biological factors could play an important role in determining the severity of the disease, in particular the ACE2 receptor could be the key element in the development of the differences in gender-related immune response.

Study objectives

Main objectives:

To study the molecular mechanism of regulation of ACE2 in relation to gender, in patients with NeuroCovid19 outcomes and in particular with stroke outcomes in Covid19, hospitalized in 3 rehabilitation facilities.

In particular they will be performed:

  • Epigenetic study: evaluation of methylation levels of ACE2 promoter and miR-200c-3p levels.
  • Biochemical analysis: the evaluation of serum levels of angiotensin II, ACE2 and Vitamin D.
  • Correlation between rehabilitative outcome and biological markers (epigenetic and biochemical) This project will study the molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of ACE2 related to gender differences in patients post stroke in NeuroCOVID-19 (stroke) hospitalized in Rehabilitation facilities and the relationship between these variables and the rehabilitation outcome.

If the study showed the presence of molecular mechanisms capable of influencing recovery, we could identify rehabilitation pathways more tailored to the characteristics of the patient.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

77

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Rome, Italy, 00168
        • Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with first ischemic stroke (of ischemic or hemorrhagic aetiology) in subacute phase (within six months after the acute event), hospitalized at the participating intensive-extensive rehabilitation centers will be included

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • stroke patients (hemorrhagic or ischemic) documented through Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or Computed Tomography (CT);
  • NeuroCOVID19 stroke patients with double nasopharyngeal swab negative after 24 hours for SARS-Cov2.
  • latency time within 6 months after stroke event;
  • sufficient cognitive and language skills to understand the instructions related to the administration of the assessment scales and to sign informed consent;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • behavioral and cognitive disorders that may interfere with the therapeutic activity;
  • other orthopaedic or neurological complications that may interfere with the rehabilitation protocol;
  • inability to understand and sign informed consent;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Covid patients
Inpatients and outpatients admitted to the investigators' rehabilitation facility with covid symptoms
Conventional rehabilitation and Robotic treatment of the upper limb (30 sessions, 5 times a week) using a set of 4 robotic devices: Motore (Humanware); Amadeo, Diego, Pablo (Tyromotion). The training will include motor-cognitive exercises specifically selected to train spatial attention, vision and working memory, praxis, executive function, and speed of processing.
Epigenetic study: evaluation of methylation levels of ACE2 promoter and miR-200c-3p levels.
Biochemical analysis: the evaluation of serum levels of angiotensin II, ACE2 and Vitamin D.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in promoter methylation levels of ACE2
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline [T0], First Treatment (6 weeks and 30 rehabilitation session) [T1]
Promoter methylation of ACE2 using pyrosequencing analysis with PyroMark Q24 (Qiagen, Germany).
Time Frame: Baseline [T0], First Treatment (6 weeks and 30 rehabilitation session) [T1]
expression levels of miR-200c-3p in serum
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline [T0], First Treatment (6 weeks and 30 rehabilitation session) [T1]
expression levels of miR-200c-3p in serum using qRT-PCR (ThermoFisher)
Time Frame: Baseline [T0], First Treatment (6 weeks and 30 rehabilitation session) [T1]

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
serum levels of Angiotensin II, ACE2 and Vitamin D
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline [T0], First Treatment (6 weeks and 30 rehabilitation session) [T1]
serum levels of Angiotensin II, ACE2 and Vitamin D by ELISA assay tests (Bio-Rad)
Time Frame: Baseline [T0], First Treatment (6 weeks and 30 rehabilitation session) [T1]
Change in Modified Barthel Index (BI)
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline [T0], First Treatment (6 weeks and 30 rehabilitation session) [T1]
The BI is designed to assess the ability of an individual with a neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disorder to care for him/herself. It ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher number meaning better performance in activities of daily living.
Time Frame: Baseline [T0], First Treatment (6 weeks and 30 rehabilitation session) [T1]
Changes in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline [T0], First Treatment (6 weeks and 30 rehabilitation session) [T1]
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was designed as a rapid screening instrument for mild cognitive dysfunction. It assesses different cognitive domains: attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. Time to administer the MoCA is approximately 10 minutes. The maximum possible score is 30 points.
Time Frame: Baseline [T0], First Treatment (6 weeks and 30 rehabilitation session) [T1]
Changes in the Cumulative Ilness Rating scale (CIRS)
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline [T0], First Treatment (6 weeks and 30 rehabilitation session) [T1]
The cumulative Illness Rating scale quantifies burden of disease in elderly patients (comorbidity scale). The cumulative score range from 0 to 56
Time Frame: Baseline [T0], First Treatment (6 weeks and 30 rehabilitation session) [T1]
Change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke for Upper Extremity portion (FMA-UL)
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline [T0], First Treatment (6 weeks and 30 rehabilitation session) [T1]
The FMA-UL is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index. It is designed to assess motor functioning, sensation and joint functioning in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. The upper limb portion of the FMA-UL ranges from 0 (hemiplegia) to 66 points (normal upper limb motor performance).
Time Frame: Baseline [T0], First Treatment (6 weeks and 30 rehabilitation session) [T1]
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline [T0], First Treatment (6 weeks and 30 rehabilitation session) [T1]
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is the simplest and most commonly used numeric scale to rate the pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).
Time Frame: Baseline [T0], First Treatment (6 weeks and 30 rehabilitation session) [T1]
Neuropathic Pain Four Questions (DN4)
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline [T0], First Treatment (6 weeks and 30 rehabilitation session) [T1]
The DN4 used to evaluate presence of neuropathic pain, and consist of a brief interview of four questions answered yes/no: two on what the patient has conceived and two during the exam for the evaluation of hypoesthesia to the touch or sting and the evaluation of allodynia with the skimming of the skin. For each 'yes' a point is assigned. The total score is given by the sum of the individuals. The cut off for the presence of neuropathic pain is '4'.
Time Frame: Baseline [T0], First Treatment (6 weeks and 30 rehabilitation session) [T1]
change in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time Frame: [Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Treatment (6 weeks) (T1)]
The MAS is a 6 point ordinal scale used for grading hypertonia in individuals with neurological diagnoses. A score of 0 on the scale indicates no increase in tone while a score of 4 indicates rigidity. Tone is scored by passively moving the individual's limb and assessing the amount of resistance to movement felt by the examiner.
[Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Treatment (6 weeks) (T1)]
change in Motricity Index (MI)
Time Frame: [Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Treatment (6 weeks) (T1)]

The MI aims to evaluate lower limb motor impairment after stroke, administrated on both sides.

Items to assess the lower limbs are 3, scoring from 0 to 33 each: (1) ankle dorsiflexion with foot in a plantar flexedposition (2) knee extension with the foot unsupported and the knee at 90° (3) hip flexion with the hip at 90° moving the knee as close as possible to the chin. (no movement: 0, palpable flicker but no movement: 9, movement but not against gravity :14, movement against gravity movement against gravity: 19, movement against resistance: 25, normal:33).

[Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Treatment (6 weeks) (T1)]
hand grip strenght test
Time Frame: [Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Treatment (6 weeks) (T1)]
it is a test to measure the maximum isometric strength of the hand and forearm muscles
[Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Treatment (6 weeks) (T1)]
pinch grip strenght test
Time Frame: [Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Treatment (6 weeks) (T1)]
A pinch grip is a form of precision grip whereby an object is pinched
[Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Treatment (6 weeks) (T1)]
Change in Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC)
Time Frame: [Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Treatment (6 weeks) (T1)]
Functional Ambulation Classification is a functional walking test that evaluates ambulation ability. This 6-point scale assesses ambulation status by determining how much human support the patient requires when walking, regardless of whether or not they use a personal assistive device.
[Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Treatment (6 weeks) (T1)]
change in 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
Time Frame: [Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Treatment (6 weeks) (T1)]
This test will assess the patient's speed during gait. Patients will be asked to walk at their preferred maximum and safe speed. Patients will be positioned 1 meter before the start line and instructed to walk 10 meters, and pass the end line approximately 1 meter after. The distance before and after the course are meant to minimize the effect of acceleration and deceleration. Time will be measured using a stopwatch and recorded to the one hundredth of a second (ex: 2.15 s). The test will be recorded 3 times, with adequate rests between them. The average of the 3 times should be recorded.
[Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Treatment (6 weeks) (T1)]
Change in Time Up And Go (TUG)
Time Frame: [Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Treatment (6 weeks) (T1)]
The Time Up And Go is a test used to assess mobility, balance, and walking in people with balance impairments. The subject must stand up from a chair (which should not be leant against a wall), walk a distance of 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair and sit down - all performed as quickly and as safely as possible. Time will be measured using a chronometer.
[Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Treatment (6 weeks) (T1)]
Change in Six-Minute Walking Test (6MWT)
Time Frame: [Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Treatment (6 weeks) (T1)]
The 6MWT measures the distance a subject covers during an indoor gait on a flat, hard surface in 6 minutes, using assistive devices, as necessary. The test is a reliable and valid evaluation of functional exercise capacity and is used as a sub-maximal test of aerobic capacity and endurance. The minimal detectable change in distance for people with sub-acute stroke is 60.98 meters. The 6MWT is a patient self-paced walk test and assesses the level of functional capacity. Patients are allowed to stop and rest during the test. However, the timer does not stop. If the patient is unable to complete the test, the time is stopped at that moment. The missing time and the reason of the stop are recorded. This test will be administered while wearing a pulse oximeter to monitor heart rate and oxygen saturation, also integrated with Borg scale to assess dyspnea.
[Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Treatment (6 weeks) (T1)]
Kinematic analysis
Time Frame: [Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Treatment (6 weeks) (T1)]
Kinematic information recorded during the administration of the Evaluation Task provided by Motore, based on a center-out point-to-point reaching activity.
[Time Frame: Baseline (T0), Treatment (6 weeks) (T1)]

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Irene APRILE, MD,PHD, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 4, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 16, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FDG_Acegender_2021

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neurologic Manifestations

Clinical Trials on Robotic assisted intervention

3
Subscribe