Transbronchial Biopsy Assisted by Robot Guidance in the Evaluation of Tumors of the Lung (TARGET)

February 28, 2024 updated by: Auris Health, Inc.

Transbronchial Biopsy Assisted by Robot Guidance in the Evaluation of Tumors

This study is designed to evaluate clinical safety and diagnostic accuracy of the robotic-assisted bronchoscopy with biopsy performed with the Monarch™ Endoscopy Platform in a broad range of patients with pulmonary lesions.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Despite technological advancements in guided bronchoscopy such as electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy and radial probe endobronchial ultrasound, successful biopsy of peripheral pulmonary lesions remains a challenge due to a number of factors, one of which may be the ability to gain access to peripheral lesions due to the size and maneuverability of conventional bronchoscopes. The diagnostic yield of conventional bronchoscopic approaches for peripheral lesions remains suboptimal.

A novel robotic assisted bronchoscopy procedure now exists for patients with lung nodules. This procedure is performed using the Monarch™ platform (Auris Health, Inc., Redwood City, CA). This study is expected to enroll up to 1200 patients at up to 30 investigative sites.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

691

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • University Health Network
    • Hong Kong
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
        • Prince of Wales Hospital
    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259
        • Mayo Clinic Arizona
    • California
      • Encinitas, California, United States, 92024
        • Costal Pulmonary Associates
      • Rancho Mirage, California, United States, 92270
        • Eisenhower Medical Center
    • Connecticut
      • Farmington, Connecticut, United States, 06030
        • The University of Connecticut Health Center
    • Florida
      • Sarasota, Florida, United States, 34239
        • Sarasota Memorial Hospital
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University of Chicago Medicine
      • Winfield, Illinois, United States, 60190
        • Northwestern Medicine Central DuPage Hospital
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46237
        • Franciscan Health Indianapolis
    • Michigan
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States, 49546
        • Spectrum Health System
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55407
        • Minnesota Lung Center, Ltd
    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14203
        • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 931531
        • Cleveland Clinic
    • Oklahoma
      • Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States, 74133
        • Cancer Treatment Centers of America
    • Pennsylvania
      • Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States, 16602
        • Clinical Research Associates of Central PA
      • Erie, Pennsylvania, United States, 16550
        • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Hamot
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203
        • TriStar Centennial Medical center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules considered to undergo a bronchoscopy procedure per standard of care.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Over 21 years of age;
  2. Capable and willing to give informed consent;
  3. Acceptable candidate for an elective, non-emergent bronchoscopic procedure;
  4. Lung lesions, 8 mm to 50 mm in size, requiring bronchoscopic diagnosis which were identified on thin slice CT scan within 28 days of the intended bronchoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Medical contraindication to bronchoscopy as assessed by the investigator
  2. Presence of uncorrectable bleeding disorders
  3. Medical devices interfering with electro-magnetic navigation, including but not limited to pacemaker
  4. Patients with the target lesion having endobronchial involvement seen on chest CT
  5. Lack fitness to undergo flexible bronchoscopy as determined by the bronchoscopist prior to procedure,
  6. Participation in any other clinical trial within 30 days of enrollment that would interfere with this study;
  7. Uncontrolled or irreversible coagulopathy;
  8. Female subjects who are pregnant or nursing at the time of the procedure or those of child-bearing potential refusing a pregnancy test prior to the procedure;
  9. CT scan done greater than 28 days before the bronchoscopy procedure.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Robotic assisted bronchoscopy
Robotic assisted bronchoscopy procedures will be performed using the Monarch platform.
Robotic assisted bronchoscopy of peripheral airways in human subjects for the purpose of biopsying peripheral lung lesions.
Other Names:
  • Robotic assisted bronchoscopy with Monarch platform

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of device or procedure related complications
Time Frame: up to 7 days post procedure
The primary endpoint is a composite that includes pneumothorax requiring intervention rated as > Grade 1 according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scale, bleeding requiring medical intervention, rated as > Grade 1 according to the CTCAE scale, and respiratory failure, rated as > Grade 3 according to the CTCAE scale.
up to 7 days post procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of device or procedure related complications
Time Frame: up to 7 days post procedure
Individual components of the primary endpoint
up to 7 days post procedure
Rate of all pneumothoraxes
Time Frame: up to 7 days post procedure
up to 7 days post procedure
Total procedure time
Time Frame: During the procedure
During the procedure
Rate of conversion to conventional bronchoscopic procedure
Time Frame: During the procedure
During the procedure
Rate of adverse events unrelated to device or procedure
Time Frame: up to 7 days post procedure
up to 7 days post procedure
Stage at diagnosis
Time Frame: up to 24 months post procedure
Stage at diagnosis (if applicable) will be evaluated for all robotic-assisted bronchoscopy procedures performed for suspicion of lung cancer
up to 24 months post procedure
Diagnostic yield
Time Frame: up to 24 months post procedure
Diagnostic yield for all robotic-assisted procedure performed for suspicion of lung cancer will be evaluated based on histopathological assessment of acquired tissue samples
up to 24 months post procedure
Sensitivity for malignancy
Time Frame: up to 24 months post procedure
up to 24 months post procedure
Rate of post-bronchoscopy infections
Time Frame: up to 7 days post-procedure
up to 7 days post-procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Septimiu Murgu, MD, University of Chicago

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 10, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Robotic assisted bronchoscopy

3
Subscribe