Usability of the Smart Hallway System in Clinical Setting (SmartHallway)

Smart Hallway for Gait Assessment

The aim of the study is to examine suitability of data and processed reports acquired from the Smart Hallway system for clinical settings in terms of user acceptability and accuracy for use in clinical practice.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The goal of the study is to use off-the-shelves markerless and contactless technologies and automatically digitise the person's movements as they walk through an institutional hallway. Multi-camera-based technologies can merge 2D-video into 3D-information. With an appropriate software, one can acquire data, perform the kinematic calculations and generate a report, all with minimal or no human intervention. The specific research question are whether pathological gait or walking disorders of the patients can be identified and classified based on the system's output, whether signs of depression can be classified from the the system's output, and whether the results of the 6-minute walk test can be predicted from the the system's output.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1000
        • Recruiting
        • University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients after lower limb loss (because of traumatic reason or disease) for the LLL group; patients fitted with lower-limb orthosis because of neurological reasons for the LLO group

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ability to walk at least 10 metres without help of a person,
  • no severe cognitive problems (able to answer questionnaires),
  • native Slovenian speakers,
  • wiling to participate (signed informed consent)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe cognitive impairment,
  • not being able to walk with or without a prosthesis or orthosis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
LLL
Rehabilitation patients with lower limb loss
The patients from the LLL group will be fitted with an appropriate lower-limb prosthesis.
The patients will receive standard rehabilitation that comprises assessment performed by a multidisciplinary team (physical-and-rehabilitation-medicine specialist physician, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, psychologist, social worker, prosthetics-and-orthotics engineer).
LLO
Rehabilitation patients fitted with a lower limb orthosis
The patients from the LLO group will be fitted with an appropriate lower-limb orthosis.
The patients will receive standard rehabilitation that comprises assessment performed by a multidisciplinary team (physical-and-rehabilitation-medicine specialist physician, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, psychologist, social worker, prosthetics-and-orthotics engineer).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Smart Hallway
Time Frame: Upon admission to rehabilitation
As part of the regular clinical examination, the patients walk straight through a 7m long walkway, turn, and come back while data is collected with the Smart Hallway system. They start walking one meter outside the capture volume. The procedure is repeated five times to provide a sufficient number of walking cycles. Three-dimensional temporospatial gait features (position, joint angles, velocities, accelerations) are extracted from the acquired data.
Upon admission to rehabilitation
Falls during rehabilitation
Time Frame: Upon discharge from rehabilitation
Data on falls during rehabilitation is routinely collected and entered in the hospital information system (HIS). It will be transferred from the HIS to the study database upon the patient's discharge.
Upon discharge from rehabilitation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule
Time Frame: Upon admission to rehabilitation
The World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS II) is a generic patient-reported outcome measure of disability that has been translated into Slovenian. It covers six life domains. The scores range from 0 to 100; higher score indicates more disability (i.e., worse outcome).
Upon admission to rehabilitation
Activity Specific Balance Confidence Scale
Time Frame: Upon admission to rehabilitation
The Activity Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC) is a pathology-specific patient-reported outcome measure of balance that has been translated and validated in Slovenian. The scores range from 0 to 100; higher score indicates more confidence (i.e., better outcome).
Upon admission to rehabilitation
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Time Frame: Upon admission to rehabilitation
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a patient-reported outcome measure that is used for assessing depression, which has been translated and validated in Slovenian. The scales comprises 14 items, 7 for anxiety and 7 for depression, all scored from 0 to 3, so the score range is from 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher score means more pronounced anxiety and depression (i.e., worse outcome).
Upon admission to rehabilitation
Six-minute walk test
Time Frame: Upon admission to rehabilitation
The Six-minute Walk Test (6MWT) is a standard test for assessing walking speed over a long distance with good and well-known metric characteristics. Longer walked distance means higher walking speed (i.e., better outcome).
Upon admission to rehabilitation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Helena Burger, MD, PhD, University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 24, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 16, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Amputation

Clinical Trials on Lower-limb prosthesis

Subscribe