- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04813081
The Evaluation of Free Gingival Graft Operations Around Implant or Teeth on Quality of Life
March 23, 2021 updated by: Serap Karakış Akcan, University of Beykent
The Evaluation of Free Gingival Graft Operations Around Implant or Teeth on Quality of Life: Parallel-controlled Prospective Clinical Trial
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quality of life of patients who underwent FGG surgery around the natural tooth and as a second surgery after the implant operation, in comparison with general oral health assesment index(GOHAI).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Thirty-two participants were included who were referred to the periodontology clinic suffering insufficient keratinized gingiva / mucosa deficiency around the implant and / or tooth/teeth.
GOHAI-total and GOHAI psychological impact, functional limitation, pain and discomfort, behavioral impact subcategories were recorded at before and postoperative first week and 30th day.
Also, satisfaction questionnaires, number of painkillers and visual analog scale values were recorded.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
32
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey, 34500
- Beykent University Faculty of Dentistry
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Non-smoking
- Teeth and implants with keratinized gingiva width <1 mm
- A healthy periodontal and peri-implant condition
- Patients who didn't have ever experience periodontal surgery had first oral surgery experience with dental FGG operation for the first time
- Patients who underwent implant surgery for the first oral surgery experience
- Maximum two teeth/implants on recipient area
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients receiving any medication to disrupt wound healing
- Lactation or pregnancy
- Caries or defects on the tooth root surface
- Periapical lesion in the recipient area active periodontal disease
- Patients who have previously had periodontal or oral surgery experiences
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Free gingival graft around dental implant patients
Test Group (TG) consists of patients have free gingival graft around dental implant patients
|
In the recipient area, a half-thickness flap with two vertical incision widths was removed with a horizontal incision with 15C blades from the mucogingival junction.
The recipient site was determined such that one or two teeth or one tooth extends into the mesial and distal regions of the tooth.
Muscle attachments were dissected and FGG was placed on recipient bed and non-resorbable monofilament sutures were used for fixing the four corners of the graft.
|
|
Active Comparator: Free gingival graft around the teeth
Control Group (CG) consists of patients have free gingival graft around the teeth.
|
In the recipient area, a half-thickness flap with two vertical incision widths was removed with a horizontal incision with 15C blades from the mucogingival junction.
The recipient site was determined such that one or two teeth or one tooth extends into the mesial and distal regions of the tooth.
Muscle attachments were dissected and FGG was placed on recipient bed and non-resorbable monofilament sutures were used for fixing the four corners of the graft.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
General Oral Health Assesment Index (GOHAI) scores- intragroup comparisons change between from baseline to other follow-up times and intergroup comparisons all follow-up times
Time Frame: Baseline, postoperative 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6. and 7. days and first month.
|
The questions that contains 12 items and that give subcategorized about functional limitations, pain and discomfort, psychological impacts, and behavioral impact.
|
Baseline, postoperative 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6. and 7. days and first month.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Age
Time Frame: baseline
|
18-65 years
|
baseline
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Gender
Time Frame: baseline
|
male, female
|
baseline
|
|
Keratinized gingival width (KGW)
Time Frame: baseline, first month
|
the distance between the gingival margin and mucogingival junction from tooth/implant in operation area
|
baseline, first month
|
|
Graft volume (GV)
Time Frame: during surgery
|
graft vertical height X graft mesiodistal length X graft thickness
|
during surgery
|
|
Surgery localization
Time Frame: baseline
|
maxilla, mandible, anterior, posterior
|
baseline
|
|
Operation time
Time Frame: during surgery
|
operation time between of first incision and last suture
|
during surgery
|
|
Satisfaction questionnaires
Time Frame: first month
|
A questionnaire designed by authors with 12 questions was used to assess patient satisfaction.
Answers were either categorized as "positive" or "negative".
|
first month
|
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: postoperative 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6. and 7. days
|
a 100-mm horizontal scale and classify the level of postoperative pain experience from 0 (no pain) to 100 (the worst pain ever experienced)
|
postoperative 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6. and 7. days
|
|
Painkiller consumption
Time Frame: postoperative 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6. and 7. days
|
the total number of painkillers for each follow-up day
|
postoperative 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6. and 7. days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: berceste güler, phd, Kutahya Health Sciences University
- Study Director: serap karakış akcan, phd, Beykent University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Berglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, Avila-Ortiz G, Blanco J, Camargo PM, Chen S, Cochran D, Derks J, Figuero E, Hammerle CHF, Heitz-Mayfield LJA, Huynh-Ba G, Iacono V, Koo KT, Lambert F, McCauley L, Quirynen M, Renvert S, Salvi GE, Schwarz F, Tarnow D, Tomasi C, Wang HL, Zitzmann N. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S286-S291. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12957.
- Zucchelli G, Tavelli L, McGuire MK, Rasperini G, Feinberg SE, Wang HL, Giannobile WV. Autogenous soft tissue grafting for periodontal and peri-implant plastic surgical reconstruction. J Periodontol. 2020 Jan;91(1):9-16. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0350. Epub 2019 Oct 6.
- McGuire MK, Scheyer ET, Gwaltney C. Commentary: incorporating patient-reported outcomes in periodontal clinical trials. J Periodontol. 2014 Oct;85(10):1313-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.130693. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
- Locker D, Matear D, Stephens M, Lawrence H, Payne B. Comparison of the GOHAI and OHIP-14 as measures of the oral health-related quality of life of the elderly. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001 Oct;29(5):373-81. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2001.290507.x.
- Mei CC, Lee FY, Yeh HC. Assessment of pain perception following periodontal and implant surgeries. J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Dec;43(12):1151-1159. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12618. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
May 1, 2017
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 31, 2019
Study Completion (Actual)
March 4, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 23, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
March 24, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 24, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 23, 2021
Last Verified
March 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- B.30.2.AYD.0.00.00-480.2/184
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Patient Reported Outcome
-
Thammasat UniversityCompletedPatient Reported Outcome MeasureThailand
-
Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyMillennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CompletedPatient Reported Outcome Measures | ComplianceUnited States
-
University Medical Center GoettingenRecruitingSupportive Care | Patient Related Outcome Measures | Patient Reported Outcome (PRO)Germany
-
Manuela EicherRecruitingPatient Reported Outcome Measures | Patient SafetySwitzerland
-
Nordlandssykehuset HFUniversity Hospital of North Norway; University of Tromso; Helgelandssykehuset...RecruitingPatient Reported Outcome MeasureNorway
-
Kocaeli City HospitalNot yet recruitingPatient Reported Outcome Measures | Postoperative Recovery
-
Orthosensor, Inc.CompletedPatient Engagement | Knee Arthroplasty | Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)United States
-
Guangdong Provincial People's HospitalNot yet recruitingPatient Reported Outcome Measures | Pulmonary Surgical ProceduresChina
-
Ankara UniversityCompletedMajor Abdominal Surgery | Patient-reported OutcomeTurkey
-
Dr Robert BoweNobel BiocareNot yet recruitingDental Implant | Dental Restorations | Patient Experience | Patient Reported Outcome
Clinical Trials on Free Gingival Graft
-
University of Sao PauloUniversidade Estadual de MaringáActive, not recruiting
-
Biruni UniversityNot yet recruitingInsufficient Keratinized GingivaTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Göteborg UniversityRecruitingGingiva AtrophyUnited Arab Emirates
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingGingival RecessionEgypt
-
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam UniversityRecruitingGingival Recession, Localized | Soft Tissue Volume Changes | Keratinized Tissue DeficiencyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Berceste GulerRecruitingGingival Recession | Lack of Keratinized GingivaTurkey
-
Yonca NazikerCompletedGingival RecessionTurkey
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamRecruitingGingival Recession | Thin Gingiva | Lack of Keratinized Attached Peri-implant MucosaUnited States
-
Cairo UniversityActive, not recruitingHealthy | Deficient Keratinized MucosaEgypt