- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06037694
Effectiveness of Meshed Free Gingival Graft for Widening of Keratinized Tissues
Widening of Keratinized Tissues With an Expanded Meshed Free Gingival Graft: a Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The importance of the width of keratinized mucosa (KM) at implant sites remains a subject of ongoing debate. Reduced dimensions of KM (width <2 mm) are associated with mucosal recession, biofilm accumulation, soft-tissue inflammation, marginal bone loss, peri-implantitis and patient discomfort. Surgical options to increase the width of KM include an apically positioned flap, either alone or in combination with an autogenous graft or a xenogeneic collagen matrix. The free gingival graft (FGG) is a well-established technique with a history of successful clinical use. The harvesting procedure for autogenous graft from the palatal mucosa, however, is usually associated with significant patient morbidity, especially when there is a need to graft extensive mucosal areas. To overcome this problem, various graft modifications have been proposed to limit the need for large-area autografts. Examples include the accordion technique, the strip gingival autograft technique, and a vertical modification of the strip gingival graft. The expanded mesh graft, another graft modification, has been used in the field of plastic surgery, especially in the treatment of large burn wounds. Recently, De Greef, Carcuac, De Mars et al. proposed this technique to be used in periodontal plastic surgery, more specifically, in the widening of KM at implant sites by means of a meshed free gingival graft (mesh-FGG). In this case series, initially inadequate width of KM in edentulous areas could be successfully increased prior to implant installation, without the need for any extensive autograft harvesting. Data from trials comparing mesh-FGG to conventional FGG and assessing the long-term efficacy of this novel technique, however, are missing.
The investigators hypothesize that the mesh-FGG technique will demonstrate similar clinical results (non-inferiority: increase in KM width) but improved patient-reported outcomes (superiority: post-surgical morbidity) compared to the FGG.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Olivier Carcuac, DDS, PhD
- Phone Number: 00971 556275575
- Email: olivier.carcuac@gu.se
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Jan Derks, DDS, PhD
- Phone Number: 0046 317863124
- Email: jan.derks@odontologi.gu.se
Study Locations
-
-
-
Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 0000
- Recruiting
- ConfiDent ® Dental Surgery Clinic, Dubai Palm Jumeirah
-
Contact:
- Olivier Carcuac, DDS, PhD
- Phone Number: 0097556275575
- Email: olivier.carcuac@gu.se
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ≥18 years of age,
- systemically healthy,
- presence of ≥2 adjacent implants in both sides of the mandibles showing <2 mm of KM on the buccal aspects,
- subjects have to present with discomfort from brushing and/or difficulties in maintaining proper home care due to inadequate dimension of KM
- Full-Mouth Plaque Score (FMPS) <20%,
- Full-Mouth Bleeding Score (FMBS) <20%.
Exclusion Criteria:
- pregnancy or lactation,
- tobacco smoking,
- uncontrolled medical condition,
- medication that can affect gingival conditions.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Free Gingival Graft
A mucogingival surgery where a conventional free gingival graft harvested from the palate is placed on a recipient site prepared to increase the width of KM at implant sites.
|
Implant site with insufficient dimensions of KM will be covered by a conventional free gingival graft.
|
|
Experimental: Meshed Free Gingival Graft
A mucogingival surgery where a meshed free gingival graft harvested from the palate is placed on a recipient site prepared to increase the width of KM at implant sites.
|
Implant site with insufficient dimensions of KM will be covered by a expanded meshed free gingival graft.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes of Keratinized Mucosa width (KMW)
Time Frame: up to 1 year
|
Measured as the distance from the muco-gingival-junction to the occlusal portion of the mucosa
|
up to 1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Morbidity
Time Frame: up to 2 weeks
|
Measured with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), which consists of a 10cm line, with two end points representing 0 ('no pain') and 10 ('pain as bad as it could possibly be')
|
up to 2 weeks
|
|
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: up to 1 year
|
Measured with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), which consists of a 10cm line, with two end points representing 0 ('not satisfied') and 10 ('satisfied as much as it could possibly be')
|
up to 1 year
|
|
Changes of Keratinized Mucosa Thickness (KMT)
Time Frame: up to 1 year
|
measured by a therapeutic probe with a rubber stop
|
up to 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Jan Derks, Göteborg University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Thoma DS, Naenni N, Figuero E, Hammerle CHF, Schwarz F, Jung RE, Sanz-Sanchez I. Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Mar;29 Suppl 15:32-49. doi: 10.1111/clr.13114.
- Sanz M, Schwarz F, Herrera D, McClain P, Figuero E, Molina A, Monje A, Montero E, Pascual A, Ramanauskaite A, Renouard F, Sader R, Schiegnitz E, Urban I, Heitz-Mayfield L. Importance of keratinized mucosa around dental implants: Consensus report of group 1 of the DGI/SEPA/Osteology Workshop. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Jun;33 Suppl 23:47-55. doi: 10.1111/clr.13956.
- Schwarz F, Derks J, Monje A, Wang HL. Peri-implantitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S246-S266. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12954.
- Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Avila-Ortiz G, Urban IA, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification and its impact on peri-implant health: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2021 Jan;92(1):21-44. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0716. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
- Lim HC, An SC, Lee DW. A retrospective comparison of three modalities for vestibuloplasty in the posterior mandible: apically positioned flap only vs. free gingival graft vs. collagen matrix. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Jun;22(5):2121-2128. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2320-y. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
- Singh M, Nuutila K, Collins KC, Huang A. Evolution of skin grafting for treatment of burns: Reverdin pinch grafting to Tanner mesh grafting and beyond. Burns. 2017 Sep;43(6):1149-1154. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.01.015. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
- De Greef A, Carcuac O, De Mars G, Stankov V, Cortasse B, Giordani G, Van Dooren E. The expanded mesh free gingival graft: A novel approach to increase the width of keratinized mucosa. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2024 Sep;14(3):157-164. doi: 10.1002/cap.10264. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- OCarcuac-meshFGG
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Gingiva Atrophy
-
Odontostomatologic Laser Therapy Center, Florence...University of FlorenceCompleted
-
University of Sao PauloCompleted
-
Universidad Complutense de MadridOsteology FoundationCompleted
-
Berceste GulerRecruitingGingival Recession | Lack of Keratinized GingivaTurkey
-
Biruni UniversityRecruitingInsufficient Keratinized GingivaTurkey
-
The Dental Hospital of Zhejiang University School...CompletedInadequately Attached GingivaChina
-
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences RohtakRecruiting
-
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences RohtakActive, not recruiting
-
Wen LuoCompletedImplant | Thin-gingiva | Clinical and Radiographic Effect | Thick-gingivaChina
Clinical Trials on Conventional Free Gingival Graft
-
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam UniversityRecruitingGingival Recession, Localized | Soft Tissue Volume Changes | Keratinized Tissue DeficiencyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Yonca NazikerCompletedGingival RecessionTurkey
-
Cairo UniversityActive, not recruitingHealthy | Deficient Keratinized MucosaEgypt
-
University of Sao PauloUniversidade Estadual de MaringáActive, not recruiting
-
Biruni UniversityNot yet recruitingInsufficient Keratinized GingivaTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingGingival RecessionEgypt
-
October University for Modern Sciences and ArtsRecruitingDeficient Keratinized MucosaEgypt
-
Berceste GulerRecruitingGingival Recession | Lack of Keratinized GingivaTurkey
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamRecruitingGingival Recession | Thin Gingiva | Lack of Keratinized Attached Peri-implant MucosaUnited States