The Effect of NMES on Bowel Management in People With Chronic SCI (FES_Bowel)

March 13, 2023 updated by: Bersch-Porada Ines, Swiss Paraplegic Centre Nottwil

The Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Bowel Management in People With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury - a Pilot Study

It has been reported that 62% of all people with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) have experienced faecal incontinence and that neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) is a major sequela. As an alternative to abdominal massage or the use of suppositories, the electrical stimulation (ES) of the abdominal wall has been shown to be effective in decreasing the bowel transit time as well as decreasing constipation in children with slow-transit constipation. Due to the intrinsic nature of the guts' innervation, we expect to reproduce these positive effects in people with SCI through administration of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A SCI entails devastating changes to a person's life. The extent of these changes depends on the level and degree of the lesion. NBD is one of the most important sequelae occurring in the majority of people with a SCI. It has been reported that 62% of people with SCI had experienced faecal incontinence . In fact, NBD is caused by a disruption of the autonomic nervous system leading to a disturbed colonic peristalsis. The enteric nervous system of the intestines is an intrinsic system that can function independently, but it is widely influenced by the autonomic nervous system. As such, its regulation is perturbed because the parasympathetic and the sympathetic nervous systems do modulate it but do not directly control the smooth muscle cells of the bowel . Depending on the level of the lesion, the bowel function can be affected in various ways ranging from constipation to overflow incontinence.

Hence, NBD has a major impact on the quality of life of paraplegics and tetraplegics. Not only is there a physical component to it consisting of constipation, haemorrhoids or abdominal distension but these gastrointestinal impairments also have a social aspect. People with SCI often end up avoiding social events and tend to isolate because of the fear of incontinence.

The immense expenditure of time for bowel evacuation is a consequence of the dyscoordination of faecal elimination. According to a survey study, 22% of all participants with SCI spend 31 to 60 minutes and 14% more than 60 minutes on bowel care per defecation. For example, people with an upper motor neuron lesion to their bowel are mainly confronted with faecal retention and constipation. Among the methods for bowel evacuation, the application of digital stimulation of the rectum and/or the insertion of a suppository are mostly used. Some people also use abdominal massage just before bowel evacuation . Only a few studies have investigated the effect of ES to the abdominal wall on the defaecation time in people with SCI and an upper motor neuron lesion but none investigated the defecation time in people with SCI with a lesion below the level of Th12. Nevertheless, the results of this therapeutic modality are very promising for different populations such as multiple sclerosis and children with slow-transit constipation by decreasing constipation and increasing transit times respectively.

By means of providing a more efficient and reliable method to support people with SCI in their bowel management strategy.A pilot study with a convenience sample of 20 out- and inpatients of the Swiss Paraplegic Centre will be conducted. Patients who have found a good bowel management method for themselves but claim to invest too much time in this routine are eligible for the study. During their participation, they should follow their usual routine after applying ES for 30 minutes before defaecation.

Based on the recent findings and clinical experience, it is hypothesized that NMES has the potential to reduce defaecation times as well as the bowel transit time in people with SCI experiencing NBD.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • LU
      • Nottwil, LU, Switzerland, 6207
        • Recruiting
        • Swiss Paraplegic Centre
        • Contact:
          • Ines Bersch, PhD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Traumatic and non-traumatic SCI; > 1 year
  • Level of lesion: C2 - L5
  • AIS score A/B/C/D
  • Age: ≥ 18 years
  • Urge to reduce defaecation time

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients during primary rehabilitation
  • Bladder stimulator
  • Autonomic dysreflexia by application of ES of the abdominal wall
  • Pregnancy: test in women of childbearing age (15 - 49 years)
  • Opioid use
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Cancerous tissue in abdominal region
  • Patients' inability to follow the study, e.g. mental-health problems, language problems, dementia etc.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NMES Group
Participants will receive neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the abdominal wall before defaecation for 30 minutes over the course of 16 weeks.
The stimulation will be conducted at home or at the SPC for half an hour about 30 minutes before the usual bowel emptying time. Four adhesive electrodes are attached to the abdominal wall for the neuromuscular electrical stimulation. The abdominal muscles are stimulated in such a way that activation occurs, i.e. the muscle alternately contracts and relaxes again. The stimulation sessions will be documented with a defined protocol. In addition, the stool consistency is rated according to the Bristol Stool Form Scale.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score (NBDS) and the defaecation time from the stimulation protocol
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Investigation of the effect of NMES on the change in defaecation time (minutes) and its relation to the change in NBDS between the follow-up visits and baseline
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Corn Test
Time Frame: 24 weeks; 5 time points
"Corn Test" assessing bowel transit time
24 weeks; 5 time points
Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS)
Time Frame: 24 weeks; at each defaecation
BSFS for stool consistency
24 weeks; at each defaecation

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Qualiveen Short Form (SF)
Time Frame: 24 weeks; 5 times
Qualiveen SF to assess bladder function
24 weeks; 5 times
International Standards to document remaining Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury (ISAFSCI)
Time Frame: 24 weeks; 5 times
International Standards to document remaining Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury (ISAFSCI)
24 weeks; 5 times
Questionnaire of treatment effectiveness
Time Frame: 24 weeks; 2 times
Questionnaire of treatment effectiveness containing 3 questions about the application of the stimulation
24 weeks; 2 times

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ines Bersch, PhD, International FES Centre - Swiss Paraplegic Centre Nottwil

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 4, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 14, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries

Clinical Trials on Neuromuscular electrical stimulation

3
Subscribe