Long Term Follow-up of Patients With Prosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip Treated at University Hospitals Leuven (PROFITH)

March 12, 2026 updated by: Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) of a Total Hip Replacement (THR) is a disastrous complication of an otherwise extremely successful surgical procedure. It is associated with a burdensome treatment for the patient, significant challenges for the medical team and high costs for society. As more joint replacements are being performed each year, due to an ageing population and lower thresholds for surgery, the number of PJIs is on the rise. Many of these patients will be referred to University Hospitals Leuven as the physicians have extensive experience with this particular pathology and can offer a multidisciplinary and patient-tailored treatment. Many controversies exist in the field of PJI treatment, both with regard to the surgical aspects as well as the antibiotic treatment. Setting up randomized controlled trials to answer these questions has been proven to be very difficult due to large variations in patients, implants, germs, soft and hard tissues, antibiotic resistance patterns, and so on. Also, surgery for PJIs is usually non-elective / semi-urgent and therefore time to include patients into different trials is limited. Therefore the investigators will prospectively collect data on patients with PJI treated at University Hospitals Leuven, starting 01/01/2022, in order to have knowledge of own results and inform patients about chances of success prior to treatment; perform internal audits and quality checks; answer questions in the field of PJI treatment not suitable for RCTs.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) of a Total Hip Replacement (THR) is a disastrous complication of an otherwise extremely successful surgical procedure. It is associated with a burdensome treatment for the patient, significant challenges for the medical team and high costs for society. As more joint replacements are being performed each year, due to an ageing population and lower thresholds for surgery, the number of PJIs is on the rise. Many of these patients will be referred to University Hospitals Leuven as the physicians have extensive experience with this particular pathology and can offer a multidisciplinary and patient-tailored treatment.

Many controversies exist in the field of PJI treatment, both with regard to the surgical aspects as well as the antibiotic treatment. Setting up randomized controlled trials to answer these questions has been proven to be very difficult due to large variations in patients, implants, germs, soft and hard tissues, antibiotic resistance patterns, and so on. Also, surgery for PJIs is usually non-elective / semi-urgent and therefore time to include patients into different trials is limited.

Nevertheless, prospectively collecting data on patients with PJI who are not involved in RCTs can already be helpful. It would allow the investigators to provide the patients with percentages of success of certain interventions based on historical results. At the moment the investigators have to rely on results reported by other groups, who might use different techniques or a facing a different germ spectrum.

Furthermore, prospectively collecting data on this cohort of patients, would make it possible for the investigators to do internal audits for quality control. Being able to perform simple checks, for example is every patient discussed in the multi-disciplinary team meeting, or is the hospital switching to targeted antibiotics soon enough, would already add to the quality of the service and could lead to adjustments in the protocols.

Also, certain scientific questions, which do not lend themselves to RCTs, such as the rate of success of treatment of PJI caused by rare germs (e.g. fungi) or in a specific population (e.g. octogenarians, transplant patients), could be answered by maintaining a prospective database

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospitals Leuven - Gasthuisberg
        • Contact:
          • Georges Vles, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Every adult patient (> 18 years), regardless of sex or age, with a PJI of the hip, as based on the EBJIS 2021 criteria, is eligible for inclusion on this study. This would therefore also include women of childbearing age, although this would be extremely rare.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older
  • patients diagnosed with PJI of the hip based on EBJIS 2021 criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable to provide written informed consent
  • Patients who prefer treatment outside of University Hospitals Leuven
  • Patients with infections of the native hip joint
  • Patients with fracture-related infections (FRI)
  • Patients with uncertain diagnosis of PJI according to the 2021 EBJIS criteria
  • Patient younger than 18 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
PJI patients

Patients (older than 18 years) with PJI of a total hip replacement treated at University Hospitals Leuven.

Diagnosis of PJI of the hip is made based on the EBJIS 2021 criteria. Patients will receive standard of care.

Standard of care consisting of

  • clearance of infection
  • treatment with antibiotics (antisuppressive, DAIR) or surgery (1 stage, 2 stage Girdlestone)
  • Radiology: X-ray pelvis and hip, X-ray pelvis with kingmark, CT scan pelvis/hip

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clearance of infection
Time Frame: within 5 years
Clearance of infection based on DELPHI criteria
within 5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Chosen treatment strategy
Time Frame: within 5 years
description of chosen treatments strategy such as suppressive antibiotics, Debridement Antibiotics Implant Retention (DAIR), 1 stage, 2 stage, Girdlestone
within 5 years
Surgical complications
Time Frame: within 5 years
Occurence of sugical complications such as fracture, dislocation, nerve damage, bleeding
within 5 years
Medical complications
Time Frame: within 5 years
Occurence of complications such as delirium, renal failure, deep venous thrombosis, hospital acquired pneumonia
within 5 years
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: within 5 years
length of hospital stay in days
within 5 years
Discussion of patient in multi-disciplinary meeting
Time Frame: within 5 years
Whether or not patient is discussed in multi-disciplinary meeting
within 5 years
Readmissions within 30 days
Time Frame: within 30 days
Occurence of readmissions within 30 days
within 30 days
Mortality
Time Frame: within 5 years
Mortality of patients
within 5 years
EuroQol 5D -3L
Time Frame: within 5 years
Patients Reported Outcome Measures
within 5 years
General treatment discussion
Time Frame: within 5 years
Appropriate work-up performed? Unnecessary aspirations? Unnecessary nuclear imaging?
within 5 years
Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Time Frame: within 5 years
Patients Reported Outcome Measures
within 5 years
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
Time Frame: within 5 years
Patients Reported Outcome Measures
within 5 years
Readmissions within 90 days
Time Frame: within 90 days
Occurence of readmissions within 90 days
within 90 days
Changes in treatment
Time Frame: within 5 years
Whether or not there are changes in treatment consequent to multi-disciplinary meeting
within 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Georges Vles, Md, PhD, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 14, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2099

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2099

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 11, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe