Vestibular Socket Therapy With Simultaneous Implant Placement Versus Contour Augmentation With Early Implant Placement

November 17, 2021 updated by: Iman Abd-ElWahab Radi, PhD, Cairo University

Vestibular Socket Therapy With Simultaneous Implant Placement Versus Contour Augmentation With Early Implant Placement in Fresh Extraction Sockets : A Randomized Clinical Trial

immediate implant placement with VST technique versus early implant placement with contour augmentation in fresh extraction sockets in the esthetic zone.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

comparing VST technique with immediate implant placement that end up with final crown after 2 months with contour augmentation with early implant placement after 4- 8 weeks of soft tissue healing , then after 3 months final crown delivery both in fresh extraction sockets in the esthetic zone .

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11518
        • Iman AbdelWahab Radi
    • Giza
    • Manial
      • Cairo, Manial, Egypt, 12911
        • Faculty of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Non-restorable maxillary teeth in the esthetic zone

Intact adjacent teeth

Adequate palatal and apical bone that allows achieving implant primary stability.

Compromised sockets type II defect (Nicolas Elian 2007)

≥18 years

Systemically healthy patients

Exclusion Criteria:

Extraction sockets with acute or chronic infection or with adjacent infected teeth

Heavy Smokers > than 10 cigarettes daily

Cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemotherapy during or within the last 6 months.

Unmotivated patients to maintain adequate oral hygiene to follow up.

Patients with physical disabilities that could affect follow up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: vestibuler socket therapy
immediate implant placement in esthatic zone with final crown placement after 2 months with VST technique
immediate implant placement with VST technique versus early implant placement with contour augmentation technique
Experimental: contour augmentation
Early implant placement in esthatic zone with contour augmentation and final crown after 3 months of implant placement
immediate implant placement with VST technique versus early implant placement with contour augmentation technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implant survival
Time Frame: 12 months
If there is no pain or tenderness on use, no mobility, no history of exudates and radiographic bone loss is less than 2 mm from initial surgery implant the implant is considered successful
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in the height and thickness of the labial plate of bone
Time Frame: 12 months
will be measured by superimposing CBCT images obtained at the baseline (time of tooth extraction) and those after 12 months postimplant placement.
12 months
Changes in soft tissue height
Time Frame: 12 months
were identified midfacially and at the apex of the mesial and distal papillae by superimposing the STL (Standard Triangle Language) files of the models, obtained via IOS, at the baseline (of the unrestorable tooth) with those after 12 months of implant insertion
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Iman Radi, PHD, Professor of prosthodontics
  • Study Director: AbdelSalam ElAsakry, BDS, Private Practice

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • vst versus contour aug.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Loss of Teeth Due to Extraction

Clinical Trials on immediate implant

Subscribe