Immediate Functional Versus Non Functional Implant Loading in the Mandible

August 19, 2020 updated by: Hams Hamed Abdelrahman

A Comparative Study Between Immediate Functional and Non-functional Loading of Dental Implants in the Posterior Alveolar Mandibular Region (a Randomized Clinical Trial)

comparing immediate functionally loaded implants and immediate non functionally loaded implants in the posterior mandibular region on bases of bone density and bone loss evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients are more demanding after the revolution in immediate implant dentistry which reduces implant procedure nowadays according to literature and research. In response to patients' demands not only implants are immediately placed but also immediately loaded within 72 hours reducing the time for prosthetic loading and also improving bone formation according to some studies. The debate in modern implant dentistry is whether to immediately load the implants in functional occlusion or non-functional occlusion and which will improve the osseointegration and reduce crestal bone loss.

Implants of the BioInfinity system were placed in 16 subjects divided into two groups.

Group (A): 8 patients with missing posterior mandibular teeth whom will be rehabilitated with immediate functionally loaded implants.

Group (B): 8 patients with missing posterior mandibular teeth in whom immediate non-functionally loaded implants were used.

The two groups were evaluated at baseline, immediately after implant placement and 4 months postoperative to evaluate crestal bone level and quantitative radiographic bone density using CBCT.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alexandria, Egypt
        • Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients aged (20-40) years old.
  • Missing Posterior tooth or teeth indicated for implant placement.
  • Residual alveolar ridge at least 10 mm high and at least 4 mm wide.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systemic diseases that will contraindicate the surgery.
  • Poor Oral Hygiene.
  • The patient refuses to undergo the surgery.
  • Parafunctional habits.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: immediate functional loading with temporary crowns
patients were rehabilitated with immediate functionally loaded implants.
Patients will undergo implant placement and a minimum of 35 Ncm reading with the graded torque wrench. Temporary crowns in functional occlusion were cemented.
Experimental: immediate non functional loading with temporary crowns
patients were rehabilitated with immediate non-functionally loaded implants.
implant will be placed into the site following the manufacturer's protocol making sure to have a minimum of 35 Newton centimeter reading with the degraded torque wrench. Non-functional temporary crowns were cemented.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score
Time Frame: immediately Postoperatively
Visual analogue scale consist of a scale of 10 0 means no pain 10 menas pain is as bad as it could possibly be
immediately Postoperatively
Change in crestal bone loss
Time Frame: immediately Postoperatively and after 4 months
CBCT was done immediately after implant placement and 4 months postoperatively to assess crestal bone loss
immediately Postoperatively and after 4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 29, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 18, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Dental implants

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Implants

Clinical Trials on immediate functional implant loading

3
Subscribe