Effects of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Chronic Pain Patients and Healthy Controls (tVNS-PP)

May 9, 2023 updated by: Prof. Thomas Meyer, University Medical Center Goettingen

Randomized Trial of Effects of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Chronic Pain Patients and Healthy Controls

The tVNS-PP trial investigates the effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) on autonomic functions, immune responses, and disease severity in chronic pain and restless legs syndrome (RLS) patients as compared to healthy controls.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

A pilot study with healthy participants will investigate whether transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation at the inner tragus reduces heart rate variability and lowers blood pressure without causing undesirable, severe side effects. In addition, changes in immune markers will be analyzed in blood samples before and after the interventions. Patients with primary restless legs syndrome will undergo a similar experimental protocol, except that transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation will be performed daily. The aim is to determine whether stimulation reduces disease severity and chronic pain while improving quality of life.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Göttingen, Germany, 37073
        • University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Male and female participants between 18 and 80 years old
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria:

  • Age younger than 18 years or older than 80 years
  • Participants with somatic or mental comorbidities, especially malignant tumor diseases, cardiac insufficiencies > NYHA II, severe depressive episodes, psychosis or dementia
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Addictions to alcohol, medications or drugs (except tobacco)
  • An existing legal guardianship
  • Participation in another scientific study within the previous eight weeks before enrollment
  • Restless Legs Syndrome patients with one of the following secondary predispositions: iron deficiency, polyneuropathy, prolapsed disk, spinal stenosis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Stimulation of inner tragus
Comparing autonomic hemodynamic functions and immune responses pre- and post-stimulation of the vagus nerve

Frequency of 30 Hz, biphasic, rectangular pulses with a pulse width of 250 µs and an intensity of 20 mA.

Device: Easy Tens+ device (body clock, London, UK)

Sham Comparator: Stimulation of ear lobe
Comparing autonomic hemodynamic functions and immune responses pre- and post-stimulation of the vagus nerve

Frequency of 30 Hz, biphasic, rectangular pulses with a pulse width of 250 µs and an intensity of 20 mA.

Device: Easy Tens+ device (body clock, London, UK)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
International RLS Severity Scale
Time Frame: Seven days

Numeric score quantifying disease severity. This numeric rating scale ranges from 0 to 40 points.

The higher the achieved score, the higher is the RLS disease severity. 0 points: no symptoms, 1-10 points: mild symptoms, 11-20 points: moderate symptoms, 21-30 points: severe symptoms, 31-40 points: extreme symptoms

Seven days
Time domain analysis of heart rate variability
Time Frame: Two days
The standard deviation of the RR intervals (SDNN) and the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) in milliseconds.
Two days
Spectral analysis of heart rate variability
Time Frame: Two days
The normalized high frequency component of the RR intervals (HF-HRV) is expressed as a percentage.
Two days
Spontaneous baroreceptor sensitivity
Time Frame: Two days
The average baroreceptor sensitivity in ms/mmHg.
Two days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serum cytokine concentrations
Time Frame: Two days
Interleukin-6, interleukin-8, interleukin-1ß and tumor necrosis factor alpha in pg/ml.
Two days
Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale
Time Frame: Two days
This questionnaire has 14 items that evaluate depression and anxiety symptoms. Each item has four possible responses and is scored in a range from zero to three with higher scores representing more symptoms.
Two days
Median nerve stimulation
Time Frame: Two days
Electrical nerve stimulation of the median nerve to assess its strength-duration time constant (SDTC) or chronaxie in milliseconds. The SDTC is a measure of axonal excitability and provides indirect information about the functionality of sodium ion channels.
Two days
Sudoscan
Time Frame: Two days
Measurement of electrochemical skin conductance
Two days
Brief Pain Inventory
Time Frame: Two days
This questionnaire assesses pain severity, location of pain, and impact on daily functions in the past 24 hours. Pain severity is scored on a numeric scale from zero to ten, with zero being no pain and ten being the worst possible pain.
Two days
Short Form 12 (SF-12)
Time Frame: Two days
This questionnaire assesses the quality of life using 12 items. Each item is scaled on a range between zero and a maximum of six. Weighted sums are calculated and transformed into a population-standardized score ranging between zero and 100. The higher the score, the better is the respective life quality compared to the average population.
Two days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas Meyer, Prof., University of Göttingen
  • Principal Investigator: Elisabeth Veiz, M.Sc., University of Göttingen
  • Principal Investigator: Christoph Herrmann-Lingen, Prof., University of Göttingen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 21, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation

3
Subscribe