The Clinical Assessment of Nigella Sativa Oil vs Chlorohexidine as a Therapeutic Aid for Gingivitis, Effect on Gingival IL-6 and IL-18 and Antimicrobial Efficacy.

September 25, 2021 updated by: Ishrat Rahman
A double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted for 14 days with 37 systemically healthy patients having chronic generalized gingivitis. The current study was designed to investigate the anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial efficacy of Nigella Sativa oil compared with chlorohexidine; assessing clinical parameters and gingival interleukin 6 (IL6) and interleukin 18 (IL18) levels and supra-gingival plaque analysis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

A total of 37 systemically healthy patients, aged between 20 to 40 years with chronic generalised gingivitis were recruited based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, from the Dental Clinic at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University. The sample size was based on previously reported studies conducted to assess gingival crevicular interleukin levels using mouthwashes. A study information sheet was provided to each patient and the methodology of the clinical trial was explained. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant before enrolling on the study.

A double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Board at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (Registration number: 20-0261).

Subjects were assigned computer-generated random numbers and were blindly assigned to one of two groups; Group 1- Nigella Sativa (NS) or Group 2- Chlorohexidine (CHX) (n=20) according to the sequence of the computer-generated random numbers by an investigator not directly involved in the clinical examination and sample collection. The interventions were either N. sativa oil (Al-Hussan Food Products Factory, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia), which was brought from the local market in Riyadh or Chlorohexidine (Middle East Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia). Group 1: Maintained adequate plaque control levels using mechanical methods + N.sativa oil (5ml oil + 5ml water) pulling for 3 mins twice daily in the morning and at night, and Group 2: maintained adequate plaque control levels using mechanical methods + chlorohexidine rinse twice daily 10ml in the morning and at the night.

Unified oral hygiene instructions and instructions for each intervention were provided to all participants. A 24-hour contact number was provided to each participant, to report any concerns, adverse reactions or for any further information. Participants were told that they were free to drop out at any time.

Oral prophylaxis was performed on the same day of recruitment to bring the plaque score to almost zero, and the subjects in each group were given either N.sativa oil or chlorohexidine according to the blind randomised allocation by a third person. On day zero (baseline) of the trial after scaling, and on day 15 at the end of the trial; the following clinical parameters were assessed; plaque index (PI) and gingival index (GI) and plaque samples, as well as gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) samples, were collected.

Prior to the study, two dental examiners were calibrated to measure PI and GI, to reduce inter-examiner variability.

The collected data were analyzed using Graphpad PRISM (San Deigo, USA). Non-parametric signed Rank tests and parametric t-tests were used, as well as Fisher's exact test for contingency analysis. P values were calculated and a p value below 0.05 was deemed as a significant difference.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

37

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
        • Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Dental Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 20 natural teeth
  • Patients with moderate to severe gingivitis
  • No tooth attachment loss

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Periodontitis
  • Cigarette smokers
  • Antibiotic therapy (within the last 3 months)
  • Systemic diseases
  • Pregnant women
  • Lactating women
  • Current orthodontic treatment
  • Using an intra-oral artificial prosthesis
  • Using other chemical agents as a mouthwash

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1 / Nigella Sativa oil / NS

Group 1- Nigella Sativa (NS) N. sativa oil (Al-Hussan Food Products Factory, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia), which was brought from the local market in Riyadh.

Each participant was given a 3 weeks supply of oil, and a sterile plastic 15ml graduated measuring cap. They were asked to measure 5ml of oil into the cap and add 5ml of normal drinking water to this and rinse their mouth for 3mins with this solution and spit it out at the end. This was done morning and evening for 14 days.

Group 1: Maintained adequate plaque control levels using mechanical methods + N.sativa oil (5ml oil + 5ml water) pulling for 3 mins twice daily in the morning and at night (after brushing/breakfast in the morning, and after brushing and before sleeping at night).

Unified oral hygiene instructions and instructions for each intervention were provided to all participants.

5ml Nigella Sativa oil mixed into 5ml water prior to use and rinsed in the mouth for 3 mins and spitted out, used twice a day; morning and evening.
Active Comparator: Group 2 / Chlorohexidine / CHX

Group 2- Chlorohexidine (CHX).

Chlorohexidine (Middle East Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia).

Each participant was given a 3 week supply of chlorohexidine. They were asked to use 10ml of CHX morning and evening, rinsing their mouth for 3 mins and then spit it out at the end. This was done morning and evening for 14 days.

Group2: maintained adequate plaque control levels using mechanical methods + chlorohexidine rinse twice daily 10ml in the morning and at the night (after brushing/breakfast in the morning, and after brushing and before sleeping at night).

Unified oral hygiene instructions and instructions for each intervention were provided to all participants.

10ml of chlorohexidine mouthwash used for 3mins and spit out, used twice a day; morning and evening.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gingival index
Time Frame: Day 0 and day 15
Day 0 and day 15
Plaque index
Time Frame: Day 0 and day 15
Day 0 and day 15
IL-6 levels
Time Frame: Day 0 and day 15
Measurement of IL-6 in GCF samples
Day 0 and day 15
IL-18 levels
Time Frame: Day 0 and day 15
Measurement of IL-18 in GCF samples
Day 0 and day 15

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bacterial load
Time Frame: Day 0 and day 15
Colony forming units (CFU) count
Day 0 and day 15
Inhibition of types of bacterial growth
Time Frame: Day 0 and day 15
Assessment on the types of bacteria present within the alpha-hemolytic class of oral bacteria
Day 0 and day 15

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feedback on any adverse effects and likes/dislikes of the intervention from participants
Time Frame: Day 15
Questionnaire to report on adverse effects and likes/dislikes of the intervention.
Day 15

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ishrat Rahman, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 8, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 24, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

At this moment in time, there is no intention or need to make individual participant data available to other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gingivitis

Clinical Trials on Nigella Sativa oil

Subscribe