High Tibial Osteotomy With/Without Fulkerson Osteotomy in Knee OA

November 9, 2021 updated by: Rafał Kamiński, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education

Prospective, Randomized, Double Blinded Trial Comparing Clinical, Radiological and Laboratory Outcomes of Hight Tibial Osteotomy With or Without Concomitant Fulkerson Osteotomy

This study will compare Hight Tibial Osteotomy with or without Fulkerson Osteotomy performed on patients with early stages of Osteoarthritis with patellofemoral joint disorders. The purpose of this study is evaluate which type of osteotomy provides better clinical, radiological and laboratory outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Progression of knee cartilage degenerative changes leads to necessary total knee arthroplasty in future, which is the most popular procedure for treating OA. HTO applied at early stages of osteoarthritis allow slow down cartilage degeneration process, but the choice of performed surgery depends on surgeons personal assessment. Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome often occurs with knee arthritis. Antero-medialisation of tibial tubercle is frequent procedures for patella maltracking. So far, both, HTO and Fulkerson osteotomy was performed separately, even if patient have symptoms from patellofemoral joint and OA. The investigators believe that simultaneously surgery of HTO and fulkerson Osteotomy provides better outcomes and significantly slow down knee degeneration.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Mazowieckie
      • Otwock, Mazowieckie, Poland, 05-400
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Postgraduate Center for Medical Education, Professor A. Gruca Teaching Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Knee medial compartment or patellofemoral osteoarthritis in medical interview and physical examination
  • Confirmation of cartilage degeneration/damage and knee malalignment in radiological tests

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no informed consent to participate in the study
  • age under 18 years or above 65
  • multi ligament injury or single plane knee instability
  • another musculoskeletal disorders in lower limb
  • lower limb deformity requiring axis correction below 4o or above 12.5o
  • joints inflammatory diseases
  • ASA score > II

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: HTO and Fulkerson
High Tibial Osteotomy with Antero-medialisation of Tibial Tubercle
Surgery procedure - High Tibial Osteotomy
SHAM_COMPARATOR: HTO
Descending Hight Tibial Osteotomy
Surgery procedure - High Tibial Osteotomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biomechanics MRI
Time Frame: 1 year
Patellofemoral Joints Biomechanics improvement measured
1 year
Biomechanics MRI
Time Frame: 2 years
Patellofemoral Joints Biomechanics improvement measured
2 years
Biomechanics X-ray
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Patellofemoral Joints Biomechanics improvement measured
12 weeks
Biomechanics X-ray
Time Frame: 6 months
Patellofemoral Joints Biomechanics improvement measured
6 months
Biomechanics X-ray
Time Frame: 12 months
Patellofemoral Joints Biomechanics improvement measured
12 months
Biomechanics X-ray
Time Frame: 24 months
Patellofemoral Joints Biomechanics improvement measured
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
KOOS
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
12 weeks
KOOS
Time Frame: 6 months
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
6 months
KOOS
Time Frame: 12 months
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
12 months
KOOS
Time Frame: 24 months
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
24 months
IKDC
Time Frame: 12 weeks
International Knee Documentation Committee
12 weeks
IKDC
Time Frame: 6 months
International Knee Documentation Committee
6 months
IKDC
Time Frame: 12 months,
International Knee Documentation Committee
12 months,
IKDC
Time Frame: 24 months
International Knee Documentation Committee
24 months
Tegner Lysholm
Time Frame: 12 weeks,
Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale
12 weeks,
Tegner Lysholm
Time Frame: 6 months
Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale
6 months
Tegner Lysholm
Time Frame: 12 months
Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale
12 months
Tegner Lysholm
Time Frame: 24 months
Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale
24 months
SF-36
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The Short Form (36) Health Survey
12 weeks
SF-36
Time Frame: 6 months
The Short Form (36) Health Survey
6 months
SF-36
Time Frame: 12 months
The Short Form (36) Health Survey
12 months
SF-36
Time Frame: 24 months
The Short Form (36) Health Survey
24 months
VAS
Time Frame: 12 week
Pain Visual Analog Scale
12 week
VAS
Time Frame: 6 months
Pain Visual Analog Scale
6 months
VAS
Time Frame: 12 months
Pain Visual Analog Scale
12 months
VAS
Time Frame: 24 months
Pain Visual Analog Scale
24 months
Blood test
Time Frame: 2nd day
CRP, IL-6, CTx
2nd day
Blood test
Time Frame: 6 weeks
CRP, IL-6, CTx
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

July 15, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

May 30, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

May 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 18, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 22, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HTO_fulkerson

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Knee

Clinical Trials on High Tibial Osteotomy

Subscribe