Ankle Pain and Orientation After High Tibial Osteotomy as a Treatment of Medial Compartment Knee Osteoarthritis

September 18, 2025 updated by: Ahmed Lotfy Saber Mohammed, Sohag University

Changes in demographics and physical activities of the young population have increased the number of patients with medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) requiring surgical intervention.

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) have shown good clinical results in restoring lower extremity alignment, reducing pain, and improving knee function in patients with moderate-to-severe knee osteoarthritis and genu varum deformity.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the relation between correction of the malalignment of the knee and ankle pain and orientation in patient of medial compartment knee osteoarthritis using high tibial osteotomy by recent reports concerning the indications, functional outcomes and complication.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is highly prevalent worldwide. It is a leading cause of musculoskeletal disability and associated with activity limitation, working disability and reduced quality of life.

Osteoarthritis can affect any synovial joint in the body, however it occurs most often in weight-bearing joints, with the knee being one of the most commonly affected. Progressive loss of hyaline articular cartilage is often considered the hallmark of the disease. Within the tibiofemoral joint; articular cartilage degradation is most prevalent in the medial compartment.

Changes in demographics and physical activities of the young population have increased the number of patients with medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) requiring surgical intervention.

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) have shown good clinical results in restoring lower extremity alignment, reducing pain, and improving knee function in patients with moderate-to-severe knee osteoarthritis and genu varum deformity.

Prior to the development of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as a reliable procedure in the 1980s, high tibial osteotomy (HTO) was the most common surgical treatment for varus gonarthrosis.

HTO may influence the alignment and function of the ankle joint. In the case of greater varus deformity where the preoperative talar tilt was increased medial to the ankle or the postoperative correction angle was large, the incidence of arthritis in the ankle joint rose Therefore, it is possible for realignment procedures in the knee HTO to affect ankle joint alignment and ankle symptoms.

Assessment of change in the weight-bearing-line (WBL) ratio of the ankle joints would provide a theoretical basis for post-operative ankle joint pain and osteoarthritis progression after knee arthroplasty or HTO.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the relation between correction of the malalignment of the knee and ankle pain and orientation in patient of medial compartment knee osteoarthritis using high tibial osteotomy by recent reports concerning the indications, functional outcomes and complication .

So this study aimed to investigate the change in the weight-bearing-line (WBL) ratio of the ankle joint and ankle joint line orientation after HTO in patients with genu varum deformity.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Sohag, Egypt, 82511
        • Sohag univeristy- Faculty of medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic medial unicompartment knee arthritis
  • Active patients younger than 55 years
  • Good range of motion (ROM) .
  • Intact lateral compartment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Combined medial and lateral arthrosis.
  • Markedly decreased knee range of motion (arc of motion 10°).
  • Ligamentous instability.
  • Severe joint destruction (≥Ahlback grade III).
  • ≥55 years of age.
  • Advanced patellofemoral arthritis.
  • Rheumatoid arthritis.
  • Structural lower extremity deformities.
  • Previous operation at knee joint.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Adult with isolated medial compartmental knee osteoarthtitis
Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy will be done according to the measurement preoperatively and fixation will be by plate and screws.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ankle pain (visual analogue score)
Time Frame: 1year post operative follow up
The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores represents a continuum between no pain 0 and worst pain 10.
1year post operative follow up
Coronal alignment of the ankle
Time Frame: 1year post operative follow up
Tibial plafond inclination (TPI) (2) Talar inclination (TI) (3) Talar tilt (TT)and (4) Lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA)
1year post operative follow up
coronal plane correction
Time Frame: 1year post operative follow up
hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and knee-tibial plafond angle (KTPA)
1year post operative follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 10, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Soh-Med-21-12-18

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Investigate the Change in the Weight-bearing-line (WBL) Ratio of the Ankle Joint and Ankle Joint Line Orientation After HTO

Clinical Trials on High tibial osteotomy

Subscribe