- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05141136
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Injectate in Thoracic 2 Paravertebral Block
November 18, 2021 updated by: Do-Hyeong Kim, Gangnam Severance Hospital
A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of the Spread of Local Anesthetic Solution in Patients Receiving Ultrasound-guided Paravertebral Block at the Thoracic 2 Spinal Level: Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
The purpose of this study is to analyze the spread of local anesthetic using magnetic resonance imaging after thoracic 2 paravertebral block in patients with cervical radiculopathy.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
- Ultrasound guided thoracic 2 paravertebral block will be done using sagittal scan or transverse scan.
- Clinical parameters will be monitored (temperature, perfusion index, assessment of sensory block and analgesic effect, vital sign, adverse events) after the nerve block.
- Cervical MRI will be taken 1 hour after the nerve block.
- Follow up 7 days and 28 days after the MRI at outpatient clinic (numeric rating scale, medication quantification scale)
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
20
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Do Hyeong Kim
- Phone Number: 82-2-2019-4601
- Email: BREADFANS@yuhs.ac
Study Locations
-
-
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
- Gangnam Severance Hospital
-
Contact:
- jiyeong kim
- Phone Number: 82-2-2019-6691
- Email: JYJYSY1230@yuhs.ac
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with unilateral radiating pain in the upper extremity whose pain persists for more than 3 months despite conservative treatment
- Diagnosis: cervical degenerative disc disease, cervical foraminal stenosis, cervical stenosis with/without myelopathy
- Numeric rating score ≥ 4
- 19 years or older
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cervical or upper thoracic spine surgical history
- If the body mass index is 35 kg/m2 or more
- If you have an allergy or hypersensitivity reaction to a local anesthetic
- coagulation disorders
- Local infection at the injection site
- claustrophobia
- If you have a metal insert such as a pacemaker
- pregnancy
- Patients who are unable to communicate and have cognitive impairment
- If a person who cannot read the consent form is included among the subjects (e.g., illiterate, foreigners, etc.)
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Ultrasound probe sagittal group
A thoracic 2 paravertebra block is performed with the ultrasound probe placed sagittal and the needle in plane with respect to the probe.
|
Place the ultrasound probe vertically against the patient's spine and insert the needle in-plane.
The width of insertion of the needle is usually approximately 5 cm from the midline.
After the needle penetrates the superior costovertebral ligament and pops, when it reaches the thoracic paravertebral space, perform aspiration and inject 10 mL of 1% lidocaine.
At this time, it can be observed in real time as the infusion fluid pushes the bright pleura away from the needle.
|
Active Comparator: Ultrasound probe transverse group
A thoracic 2 paravertebra block is performed with the ultrasound probe placed transverse and the needle in plane with respect to the probe.
|
Place the ultrasound probe transverse to the spine and insert the needle in-plane.
The reflection of a transverse process is a common landmark.
The needle goes in from lateral to in plane.
The goal is a triangle between the parietal pleura anteriorly and the internal intercostal membrane and intercostal muscle posteriorly.
The final point of the needle is the transition zone from the intercostal to the thoracic paraspinal space, just anterior to the transverse process.
When it is confirmed that the tip of the needle has reached the paravertebral space, 10 mL of 1% lidocaine is injected after checking the negative pressure, and after confirming the spread of the drug in real time with ultrasound.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Injectate spread on MRI imge
Time Frame: 1 hour after thoracic 2 paravertebral block
|
Presence of injectate on each anatomic target (Paravertebral space, ventral/dorsal epidural space, intercostal nerve, contralateral space)
|
1 hour after thoracic 2 paravertebral block
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
numeric rating score
Time Frame: Before nerve block, after 30 minutes, and thereafter, at the outpatient visit on the 7th day and the outpatient visit on the 28th day.
|
A score of 0 indicates no pain and a score of 10 indicates maximum pain.
|
Before nerve block, after 30 minutes, and thereafter, at the outpatient visit on the 7th day and the outpatient visit on the 28th day.
|
perfusion index
Time Frame: Before nerve block, after 30 minutes
|
After the subject rests in the supine position for about 10 minutes, pulse oximetry is placed on the index finger to record the baseline value.
Perfusion index was measured using pulse oximetry (Root®, Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA, USA).
The perfusion index can be a useful indicator for judging the After the subject rests in the supine position for about 10 minutes, pulse oximetry is placed on the index finger to record the baseline value.
Perfusion index was measured using pulse oximetry (Root®, Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA, )
|
Before nerve block, after 30 minutes
|
skin temperature
Time Frame: Before nerve block, after 30 minutes
|
Place a touch thermometer (IntelliVue MP70 patient monitor, Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands) on the palm of your hand and measure.
Calculate the amount of change from the baseline.
Record the difference with the contralateral hand.
|
Before nerve block, after 30 minutes
|
pinprick and cold test
Time Frame: Before nerve block, after 30 minutes
|
Pinprick sensation was performed using a 22 gauge short bevel needle.
Comparison with the contralateral dermatome.
Sensation is rated as 0 (no sensation), 1 (decreased sensation), and 2 (normal).
A sensory block is considered successful if the patient reports 0 or 1. Cold sensation is measured in the same way using an ice cube.
If there is no difference in the sensation of the treated dermatome compared to the contralateral dermatome.
|
Before nerve block, after 30 minutes
|
Blood pressure in mmHg
Time Frame: Before nerve block, after 30 minutes
|
Record blood pressure , and calculate the change from baseline.
|
Before nerve block, after 30 minutes
|
Pulse rate in /min
Time Frame: Before nerve block, after 30 minutes
|
Record pulse, and calculate the change from baseline.
|
Before nerve block, after 30 minutes
|
Presence of adverse events
Time Frame: Before nerve block, after 30 minutes
|
Horner syndrome, hoarseness, dyspnea, ptosis, dysphagia
|
Before nerve block, after 30 minutes
|
medication quantification scale
Time Frame: Before nerve block, and thereafter, at the outpatient visit on the 7th day and the outpatient visit on the 28th day
|
The Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) is an instrument with potential clinical and research applications for quantifying medication regimen use in chronic pain populations.
|
Before nerve block, and thereafter, at the outpatient visit on the 7th day and the outpatient visit on the 28th day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
November 30, 2021
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
October 31, 2023
Study Completion (Anticipated)
October 31, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 27, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 18, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
December 2, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
December 2, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 18, 2021
Last Verified
November 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 3-2021-0293
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cervical Spinal Stenosis
-
Xijing HospitalFirst Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University; Tang-Du Hospital; Xi'an...RecruitingCervical Spinal StenosisChina
-
RTI SurgicalCompletedSpinal Disease | Spinal Instability | Spinal Stenosis Occipito-Atlanto-Axial | Spinal Stenosis Cervical | Spinal Stenosis Cervicothoracic RegionUnited States
-
Yonsei UniversityCompletedCervical Disc Herniation | Cervical Spinal Stenosis | Cervical Spine DamageKorea, Republic of
-
Xijing HospitalRecruitingCervical Spinal Stenosis | Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery | Barbed SutureChina
-
Dr. Christopher BaileyCompletedMyelopathy Cervical | Radiculopathy, Cervical | Spinal Stenosis Cervical | Posterior Cervical Spinal Surgery | Spondylosis, CervicalCanada
-
Technical University of MunichCharite University, Berlin, Germany; University Hospital, Geneva; Ludwig-Maximilians... and other collaboratorsUnknownCervical Disc Herniation | Degenerative Cervical Spinal Stenosis | Suspected Cervical Spine InstabilityGermany
-
Marmara UniversityBahçeşehir UniversityCompletedPain | Cervical Spondylosis | Cervical Spinal Stenosis | Disc, HerniatedTurkey
-
Xijing HospitalRecruitingCervical Spinal Cord Injury | Cervical Spinal Stenosis | Standardization | IndividuationChina
-
Marmara UniversityCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Cervical Radiculopathy | Lumbar Radiculopathy | Cervical StenosisTurkey
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandEnrolling by invitationCervical Myelopathy | Cervical Spinal StenosisSwitzerland
Clinical Trials on Ultrasound probe sagittal group
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedVascular Access ComplicationUnited States
-
Mahidol UniversityCompleted
-
Chinese University of Hong KongUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterTerminated
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedLung Neoplasm | Malignant Neoplasms of Respiratory and Intrathoracic OrgansUnited States
-
General Electric ResearchRecruitingBurn Wound | 2nd Degree Burn of the SkinUnited States
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterCompleted
-
University of Vermont Medical CenterCompletedProstate Cancer | Post-ProstatectomyUnited States
-
University of OklahomaRecruitingUse of Endobronchial Ultrasound Scope (EBUS) Transducer to Identify Pneumothorax-A Feasibility StudyPneumothoraxUnited States
-
Imperial College LondonWithdrawnDeep Vein Thrombosis | Deep Venous Thrombosis of LegUnited Kingdom