- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04381663
CSS-Assessing the Course of Degenerative Cervical Spinal Stenosis Using Functional Outcomes
The study will consist of two parts:
- In Study A, objectively assessed physical activity, gait, balance, range of movement of specific joints during walking and neurophysiological findings between patients with cervical spine stenosis (CSS) without myelopathy who will be treated conservatively and patients with stenosis and signs of myelopathy who are candidates for surgical Treatment will be compared.
- In Study B, the 6-month changes in the same outcomes in patients treated conservatively (from the first specialist consultation until 6 months later) and in patients treated surgically (preoperative day and 6-month post-operatively) will be quantified.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study A is a single centre cross-sectional study with two study groups, one that will be treated conservatively (stenosis) and one that will be treated surgically (stenosis and myelopathy).
Study B is a single centre longitudinal study where the same patient groups will be followed up during the course of their treatment.
Clinical, radiological, biomechanical (kinematic and electromyographic), neurological and neurophysiological data will be collected. Differences in and the relationship between the clinical, radiological, biomechanical, neurological and neurophysiological data will be determined .
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Basel, Switzerland, 4031
- Universitätsspital Basel
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age > 18 years
- Diagnosis of degenerative cervical spine stenosis defined by MRI (stenosis grade 2 or grade 3
- Local clinical symptoms due to degenerative changes of the cervical vertebral column with or without clinically defined myelopathy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Stenosis after trauma or neoplasm
- Prior decompressive surgery
- Previous spine or extremity surgery with a consequent sensorimotor impairment
- Other pathologies than cervical spine stenosis causing gait disturbance
- BMI > 35 kg/m2
- Use of walking aids
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Contraindications for recording of Motor evoked potentials (MEP)
- Contraindications to safely undergo MRI
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Other
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
conservative treatment
In study A this group will be treated conservatively (stenosis).
Study B is a single centre longitudinal study where the same patient groups will be followed up during the course of their treatment
|
conservative treatment for patients with cervical spine stenosis without myelopathy
|
surgical treatment (stenosis and myelopathy).
In study A this group that will be treated surgically (stenosis and myelopathy).
Study B is a single centre longitudinal study where the same patient groups will be followed up during the course of their treatment
|
surgical decompress the spinal canal in patients with moderate to severe degenerative cervical spine myelopathy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Difference in gait symmetry
Time Frame: approximate duration: 30 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2
|
The subjects will perform an instrumented gait analysis on an overground walkway with two embedded force plates
|
approximate duration: 30 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2
|
Change in balance performance
Time Frame: approximate duration: 30 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
|
Balance performance will be assessed using the modified clinical test of sensory integration of balance (m-CTSIB) using the Biodex Balance System SD
|
approximate duration: 30 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
|
Difference in neurophysiological outcome
Time Frame: approximate duration: 30 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
|
Quantitative score of Motor evoked potentials (MEP) and Somato-sensory evoked potentials (SEP)
|
approximate duration: 30 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Difference in daily physical activity
Time Frame: monitored for 7 consecutive days at visit 1 or 1 week before surgery and 6 months later at visit 2
|
daily physical activity will be objectively monitored for 7 consecutive days using the ActiGraph wGT3X-BT (ActiGraph Corp, Pensacola Florida, USA) worn around the hip
|
monitored for 7 consecutive days at visit 1 or 1 week before surgery and 6 months later at visit 2
|
Difference in spinal cord gray and white matter areas
Time Frame: approximate duration of the scan: 30. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2 (Measurement at visit 2 only in patients with cervical spine stenosis treated conservatively).
|
Participants will be investigated on the 3 Tesla (3T) whole body MRI research scanner using 2D-Averaged Magnetization Inversion Recovery Acquisitions (AMIRA) imaging
|
approximate duration of the scan: 30. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2 (Measurement at visit 2 only in patients with cervical spine stenosis treated conservatively).
|
Change in segmental quantitative muscle strength
Time Frame: approximate duration: 10 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
|
assessments of segmental muscle force via hand-held-dynamometry following the Treatment Research Initiative to Cure ALS (TRICALS) Protocol Isometric Strength Testing 2016 at each study visit
|
approximate duration: 10 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
|
Change in 25-foot walk test
Time Frame: approximate duration: 3 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
|
time of 25-foot walk test
|
approximate duration: 3 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
|
Change in 6-minute walk test
Time Frame: approximate duration: 6 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
|
distance of 6-minute walk test
|
approximate duration: 6 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
|
Change in dynamic stability and range of motion during walking
Time Frame: approximate duration: 20 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
|
Subjects will first complete overground walking trials in their own shoes at normal and fast walking speed while naming months backward in a 25-m hallway while gait CSS Study Protocol Version 2, 15.8.2019
Page 12 of 21 kinematics will be recorded using the RehaGait system.
Afterwards, patients will be asked to walk over the force plates in the laboratory at their preferred walking speed while kinematic, kinetic and Electromyography (EMG) data will be recorded.
|
approximate duration: 20 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
|
Change in pain
Time Frame: approximate duration: 2 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
|
Numeric Pain Rate Scale (NPRS), a subjective measure in which individuals rate their pain on an eleven-point numerical scale.
The scale is composed of 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst imaginable pain)
|
approximate duration: 2 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
|
Change in function
Time Frame: approximate duration: 13 min. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2
|
Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association - Scoring System (mJOA) questionnaire, This scale consists of four domain scores motor dysfunction in the upper extremities, motor dysfunction in the lower extremities, sensory function in the upper extremities and bladder function. Each scale ranges from 0 to 7, 5, 3, and 3, respectively, with a total score of 0 to 18. The severity of myelopathy is defined as mild if the mJOA score is 15 or larger, moderate if the mJOA score ranges from 12 to 14 or severe if the mJOA score is less than 12 |
approximate duration: 13 min. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2
|
Change in disability
Time Frame: approximate duration: 5 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
|
Neck Disability Index (NDI) questionnaire, a Patient-completed, condition-specific functional status questionnaire with 10 items including pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation. The NDI has sufficient support and usefulness to retain its current status as the most commonly used self-report measure for neck pain. A score of 0-4 points means no disability, 5-14 points mild disability, 15-24 points moderate disability, 25-34 points severe disability, 35-50 points complete disability |
approximate duration: 5 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
|
Change in risk of falling
Time Frame: approximate duration: 10 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
|
The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) is a subjective measure for balance and risk of falling.
Based on 14 items, vestibular function, balance ability, proprioception and muscle strength are assessed.
The cut-off value for an elevated risk of falling is at 38 of 56 points.
Older persons with a score of 45 of 56 points are able to ambulate safely and independently.
|
approximate duration: 10 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Annegret Mündermann, Prof. Dr., University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
- Principal Investigator: Cordula Netzer, Dr. med., University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
- Principal Investigator: Regina Schläger, PD Dr. med., University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
- Principal Investigator: Martin Hardmeier, PD Dr. med., University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2019-01270;ch20Muendermann
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cervical Myelopathy
-
Valérie SchuermansRecruitingCervical Disc Disease | Cervical Fusion | Fusion of Spine | Cervical Spondylosis | Cervical Disc Herniation | Myelopathy Cervical | Cervical Disc Degeneration | Radiculopathy, Cervical | Myelopathy, Compressive | Radiculopathy, Cervical Region | Radiculopathy; in Spondylosis | Radiculopathy; in Intervertebral... and other conditionsNetherlands
-
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNational Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom; Wolfson Brain Imaging...RecruitingCervical Spondylosis With Myelopathy | Degenerative Cervical MyelopathyUnited Kingdom
-
Peking University Third HospitalCompleted
-
National Taiwan University HospitalCompletedCervical Radiculopathy | Cervical MyelopathyTaiwan
-
Unity Health TorontoUnknownCervical Radiculopathy | Cervical MyelopathyCanada
-
Shanghai Changzheng HospitalRecruitingMyelopathy CervicalChina
-
University of KentuckyRecruiting
-
Imperial College Healthcare NHS TrustNot yet recruitingCervical Myelopathy
-
University of UtahEnrolling by invitationCervical MyelopathyUnited States
-
The University of Hong KongCompleted
Clinical Trials on conservative treatment
-
The Hospital of VestfoldOslo University HospitalActive, not recruitingHypertension | Obstructive Sleep Apnea | Morbid Obesity | Osteoarthrosis | Type 2 DMNorway
-
Universidad de GranadaCompleted
-
Hvidovre University HospitalCompletedAcute, Displaced Midshaft Clavicle FracturesDenmark
-
Helsinki University Central HospitalCompletedVenous InsufficiencyFinland
-
Catholic University of the Sacred HeartUnknown
-
Peking University Third HospitalCompletedChronic Ankle InstabilityChina
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompleted
-
Hospital del MarCompleted
-
University of Sao PauloUniversity College, London; Federal University of Minas GeraisCompleted
-
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)Not yet recruitingDistal Radius Fracture