Species-specific Bacterial Detector for Fast Pathogen Diagnosis of Severe Pneumonia

May 8, 2022 updated by: Chinese Medical Association

Species-specific Bacterial Detector for Fast Pathogen Diagnosis of Severe Pneumonia Patients in Intensive Care Uint: a Multicentre, Randomised Controlled Trial

This study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of the combination of PCR and CRISPR/Cas12a (SSBD)in tract secretion from lower respiratory for early targeted anti-infective therapy for patients with severe pneumonia. 5 adult ICU units from 5 hospitals in Jiangsu province participate the study and the hosted unit is the Department of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical College. All patients are randomly assigned to the experiment group and the control group. For experiment group, the combined detection of PCR andCRISPR/Cas12a is carried out in the early stage, and the antibiotic scheme is changed base on the results of PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a. The patients in the control group are adjusted according to the traditional microbial detection methods. Some clinical parameters and outcomes are recorded.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

ICU patients have a high incidence of bacterial infection in the lower respiratory tract, mainly with severe pneumonia, often causing severe sepsis and septic shock, which is one of the main causes of death in patients. At present, the biggest difficulty faced by clinicians is the continuous increase of bacterial resistance rate and the increase of patient mortality due to the early inadequacy empirical anti-infective treatment. Studies have shown that patients with VAP(Ventilator Associated Pneumonia) have irrational drug use in the early stage, with a mortality rate of more than 50%. When the rate of appropriate drug use has dropped to 33%, while mechanical ventilation time and ICU hospitalization time have been significantly shortened. Therefore, identifying pathogenes as early as possible and shortening the time of empirical anti-infective treatment are very important for improving the prognosis of patients with severe pneumonia and reducing the incidence of bacterial resistance.

There are three traditional methods for detecting pathogenic microorganisms: 1. microbial culture method is the most traditional means of identifying pathogen. It is necessary to inoculate the patient's body fluid, blood, etc. in a suitable medium, incubate in a suitable incubator, and then pass the drug. Sensitivity tests determine the resistance of microorganisms, usually takes 3-7 days. For some specific types of pathogenic microorganisms or microorganisms with harsh growth conditions, there may be negative culture results. Therefore, the traditional culture methods have disadvantages such as poor timeliness, relatively high requirements, and low positive culture rate (30-40%). 2. time-of-flight mass spectrometry: the mass spectrometry technique is used to analyze and detect the protein components of the strain, and the characteristic peak spectrum is obtained. Compared with the bacterial map in the database, the bacteria can be judged by matching. The method can be shortened by about 6-8 hours compared with the conventional culture method, but since the detection of the colony needs to reach a certain amount, the specimen can not be directly detected after obtaining the specimen, and the preliminary microbial culture is required. Therefore, the detection time still takes 1-2 days or more, and there is also the disadvantage of low timeliness. In addition, it is necessary to compare the expansion and standardization of the database, and the inability to analyze the resistance of microorganisms is also the inadequacy of the detection technology. 3. High-throughput sequencing technology: With the rapid development of molecular biology in recent years, high-throughput sequencing technology is widely used in the early diagnosis of clinical microbiology, the principle is mainly through the connection of the universal linker to the fragmentation to be sequenced. Genomic DNA, which produces tens of millions of single-molecule polyclonal polymerase chain reaction arrays, then performs large-scale primer hybridization and enzyme extension reactions, and obtains complete DNA sequence information by computer analysis. However, this technology is difficult to effectively distinguish between pathogenic bacteria and background bacteria, technology and database to be standardized, detection time still takes about 2 days, can not obtain microbial resistance, expensive and other shortcomings At the office. In summary, the current time limit for targeted anti-infective treatment is stopped 2 days after the specimen is taken. Therefore, the search for new, pathogenic microbial detection technology that is faster, more accurate and more sensitive is a hotspot and a difficult point in the field of microbial and anti-infective research in recent years.

CRISPR/Cas12a has trans-cleavage activity, which could be developed as a new molecular method for testing specific nucleotide sequences with high specificity and sensitivity . We thus initiatively designed the Species-Specific Bacterial Detector (SSBD) system basing on CRISPR/Cas12a. In theory, the method is prominent with rapidity, high sensitivity and specificity, and variable detection targets, which is an innovation in microorganism identification and maybe bring benefits to sepsis treatment. As some particular bacteria account of most of sepsis, 12 common bacteria are chosen as the initial panel according to previous studies and local epidemic data from our hospital. Our aim of the study is to establish and validate the effectiveness of the SSBD system through comparing with culture results, and then evaluate the possible clinical values in therapy adjustments and clinical outcomes of severe pneumonia in ICU, which was the major causes of sepsis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

284

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Jiangsu
      • Changzhou, Jiangsu, China, 213004
        • The First People's Hospital of Changzhou
        • Contact:
          • Bin Zhu, MD
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210000
        • Jiangsu Province Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Suming Zhou, MD
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210000
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
        • Contact:
          • Fuxi Sun, MD
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210008
        • The Affliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University
        • Contact:
          • Wenkui Yu, MD
      • Suzhou, Jiangsu, China, 215008
        • Suzhou Manicipal Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Jun Liu, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. age ≥ 18 years;
  2. Pneumonia with undetermined pathogen and lower respiratory tract specimens can be obtained ;
  3. signed informed consent;
  4. the expected length of staying in ICU is more than 3 days

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. pregnant women
  2. lactating women
  3. Those who specimens of lower respiratory tract cannot be obtained;
  4. Those who have submitted for other microbiological examination within 72 hours before enrollment;
  5. The main responsibility of infection was not in the lung, but outside the lung;
  6. Clinical diagnosis of non-bacterial pneumonia, such as Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, viral pneumonia and fungal pneumonia;
  7. Those who are estimated to die or give up treatment within 72 hours;
  8. patients have participated in other clinical studies.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: the experiment group
early adjustment of antibiotics is guided by results of SSBD
Based on 1791 microorganism genomes of 232 species from the public database, we identified species-specific DNA-tags for 12 common pathogenic bacteria, which allowed us to design our Cas12a system for using the trans-cleavage activity and judging whether bacterium infects the patient or not by fluorescence value.
No Intervention: control group
early adjustment of antibiotics is guided on the results of conventional culture

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
mortality
Time Frame: week 4
The patient's 28-day mortality rate is the survival rate from the onset to 28 days
week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the therapeutic turnaround time (TTAT)
Time Frame: week 2
the time taken from collecting the specimen for the investigation to initiating appropriate treatment on the results available
week 2
length stay of ICU
Time Frame: up to 8 weeks
days for patients in ICU
up to 8 weeks
DDD
Time Frame: everyday up to week 2
defined daily dose of antibiotics
everyday up to week 2
coverage of appropriate antibiotics
Time Frame: everyday up to week 2
numbers of patients with appropriate antibiotics on day1~day14
everyday up to week 2
clinical success rate
Time Frame: week 2
numbers of patients with clinical success on day 14
week 2
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score II score
Time Frame: baseline, every 3 day and week 2
the higher score means the more severity
baseline, every 3 day and week 2
sepsis-related organ failure assessment score
Time Frame: baseline, every 3 day and week 2
the higher score means the more serious the degree of organs failure(score:0~24)
baseline, every 3 day and week 2
length of mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: week 4
time of mechanical ventilation from randomization to day 28
week 4
the incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea
Time Frame: week 4
The incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea is the index of side effects of anti-infective treatment from randomization to day 28.
week 4

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the incidence of new multi-drug resistant bacteria colonization or infection
Time Frame: week 4
rate of multi-drug resistant bacteria colonization or infection is the index of side effects of anti-infective treatment from randomization to day 28
week 4
time of shock
Time Frame: week 4
time of shock from randomization to day 28
week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

July 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 31, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2021-260-03

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Severe Pneumonia

Clinical Trials on SSBD(PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a)

3
Subscribe