Deprescribing Intervention Among Nursing Home Residents With Major Neurocognitive Disorders (OptimaMedLTC)

November 30, 2021 updated by: Dre Edeltraut Kröger

Deprescribing Inappropriate Medication in Residents Suffering From Severe Dementia: OptimaMed Long Term Care, a Demonstration Project

Canadians with neurocognitive disorders often are admitted to nursing homes when their disease reaches an advanced stage. At the end of their life, they may encounter adverse symptoms related to medications they no longer need, while they should receive comfort care. This study proposes an intervention to reduce the use of inappropriate medications among residents of nursing homes with major neurocognitive disorders. For that purpose, nursing homes' nursing staff, physicians and pharmacists will receive education and tools for the review, adjustment or discontinuation of the medications that have become inappropriate for the residents. The residents' families will receive information regarding the complexity of drug treatment for elderly patients with major neurocognitive disorders and they will be kept informed about the proposed changes to their relative's medication. The intervention is expected to reduce the medication load while improving or maintaining the residents' well-being.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

A quasi-experimental, cluster randomized controlled trial (CRCT) based on the results of a pilot study (). The study will take place over 6 months in 6 nursing homes (NHs) of the greater Quebec City Health Board, the Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN). Three NHs will be randomized to the intervention arm, three others will serve as controls, where care will be dispensed as usual. Informed consent will be sought from the representative of NH residents with major neurocognitive disorders (MNCDs).

Intervention in experimental NHs First, all members of the care teams, i.e. nursing staff, physicians and pharmacists, will receive an enriched continuous education-knowledge exchange session to inform them on the study rationale and the means of medication optimization. This session will provide tools and strategies on adjustment of certain medications (e.g. less stringent treatment goals for control of glycaemia or hypertension, alternatives to benzodiazepines). There will be an additional emphasis on tapering and discontinuation of antipsychotics. Second, the validated lists of "generally", "sometimes" or "rarely" appropriate medications for NH residents with major neurocognitive disorders (MNCDs) will be provided to the experimental NHs' staff. They will also receive algorithms on tapering of antipsychotics. The pharmacists will initiate the intervention by performing at least one medication review for each participating resident, shortly after baseline, and additional reviews if required by the participant's clinical condition. The pharmacists' medication review will result in recommendations to be discussed with nurses and the responsible physician in usual care team meetings.

Outcomes Medication regimens will be recorded over 6 months and the active medications corresponding to the lists of "generally", "sometimes" or "rarely" appropriate medications counted. At baseline and 6 months after the beginning of the intervention, participating residents will be observed for signs of discomfort (PACSLAC) and agitation (Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Québec, Canada
        • Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of Major neurocognitive disorders, OR severe dementia (stage 7 on the Reisberg Functional Assessment Staging Tool) of any type;
  • Able to swallow
  • Having prescribed medication

Exclusion Criteria:

- Has been at the nursing home for less than 2 months at the time of enrollment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention

Nursing staff, physicians and pharmacists will be invited to a continuous education - knowledge exchange session to inform them on the study rationale and the means of medication optimization.

Pharmacists will be asked to perform medication reviews, guided by the information and tools provided, for the participating residents.

Pharmacists' recommendations will be discussed during meetings with physician and nurses.

The intervention is educational and directed at the complete nursing home care team.
NO_INTERVENTION: Control
Care as usual.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Medication regimens between study beginning and follow-up, a compared between the intervention and the control groups.
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 4-6 months after patient's inclusion into study. Less medications mean a better outcome (reduction of medication load, implying deprescribing of inappropriate medications.
List of active medications
Change from baseline to 4-6 months after patient's inclusion into study. Less medications mean a better outcome (reduction of medication load, implying deprescribing of inappropriate medications.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in level of the pain, as measured by the PACSLAC-F.
Time Frame: Change from baseline to six months after patient's inclusion into study.

This is the French version of the Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC-F) observational scale for non verbal participating patients, between baseline and follow-up, as compared between the intervention and the control groups. The PACSLAC-F scale varies between 0 and 60 with 60 being the highest measure for the observation of pain expression. For the PACSLAC-F, lower scores mean better outcomes, signifying less pain.

PACSLAC-French version (Validité et utilité clinique d'une grille d'observation (PACSLAC-F), pour évaluer la douleur chez des aînés atteints de démence vivant en milieu de soins de longue durée (1 to 60). Aubin M, Verreault R et al, Can J Aging, #1, Spring 2008

Change from baseline to six months after patient's inclusion into study.
Change in level of agitation of participating patients between baseline and follow-up, as compared between the intervention and the control groups.
Time Frame: Change from baseline to six months after patient's inclusion into study.

Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) observational scale, range from 0 to 203. Lower scores mean better outcomes, signifying less discomfort.

Cohen-Mansfield, J., Marx, M. S., & Rosenthal, A. S. (1989). A description of agitation in a nursing home. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 44(3), M77-M84.

Change from baseline to six months after patient's inclusion into study.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Edeltraut Kröger, Ph.D., CHU de Quebec

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 6, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 31, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 14, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant dat can be made available to other researchers upon personal request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dementia

Clinical Trials on Continuous education and knowledge exchange

3
Subscribe