Pre-procedural 3DCT Versus Angiography Guided PCI for Ostial Right Coronary Artery Lesions (3DCT-RCA)

March 27, 2023 updated by: Koen Ameloot, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg

Pre-procedural 3D Reconstructed Computer Tomography Versus Angiography Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Ostial Right Coronary Artery Lesions

Even with second generation drug eluting stents, rates of target lesion failure (TLF) for aorto-ostial RCA lesions remain high [3yrs TLF 14.2%]. Retrospective studies show that stent underexpansion and geographical stent-ostium mismatch are the main predictors for TLF. Geographical mismatch means that the stent is implanted either too distal (thereby not fully covering the lesion) or too proximal (thereby protruding too much in the aorta and hampering future engagement with guiding catheters). The investigators hypothesize that, pre-procedural 3D CT coronarography to determine the optimal C-arm angle of the X-ray system with the most accurate visualization of the aorto-ostial angle and determination of localization of calcium, could prevent geographical mismatch.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Limburg
      • Genk, Limburg, Belgium, 3600
        • Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically indicated non-emergent PCI for an aorta-ostial-RCA lesion defined as a significant de novo lesion [by angiography or by physiological assessment] for which the operator intends to fully cover the ostial RCA with stent struts
  • Willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergent PCI indication: if the ostial RCA lesion is the culprit lesion of an acute coronary syndrome [of note: if the ostial RCA lesion is a non-culprit lesion, patient can be included in the trial]
  • In-stent restenosis or thrombosis in the ostial RCA
  • Renal insufficiency [eGFR<30 ml/min]
  • Known allergic reaction to contrast medium

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 3DCT-guided group
PCI guided with 3DCT results and IVUS
A contrast CT-scan of the coronary arteries will be performed and 3D analyzed to determine the best angle for the C-arm during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) for stent implantation. Furthermore determining the amount and localization of calcium in the right coronary artery (RCA) and diameter and length of RCA. The use of IVUS will be used to determine the degree of calcium.
Placebo Comparator: Angiography-guided group
PCI guided by operator and IVUS
Standard of care is angiography guided PCI of the ostium of the RCA. The use of IVUS will be used to determine the degree of calcium.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Geographical mismatch as quantified by intra-coronary ultrasound (IVUS)
Time Frame: Procedural
Distance between the aorta-ostial junction and the most proximal protruding stent strut (in mm).
Procedural

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Geographical mismatch as quantified by intra-coronary ultrasound (IVUS)
Time Frame: Procedural
Percentage of patients without geographical mismatch as defined by a fully covered ostium AND a maximal length between the aorta-ostial junction and the most proximal protruding stent struts not more then 3mm
Procedural
Geographical mismatch as quantified by intra-coronary ultrasound (IVUS)
Time Frame: Procedural
The percentage of patients who need an additional stent after the final IVUS has shown that the ostium was not fully covered
Procedural
Volume of contrast agent administered
Time Frame: Procedural
Expressed in mL
Procedural
Procedural radiation dose
Time Frame: Procedural
Expressed in mGy
Procedural
Procedural duration from first puncture of artery to skin closure
Time Frame: Procedural
Expressed in minutes
Procedural
Minimal luminal area (MLA)
Time Frame: Procedural
The predicted MLA by 3DCT will be compared with the MLA prior to stent placement as obtained with IVUS
Procedural
Stent sizing
Time Frame: Procedural
Predicted stent diameter and length by 3DCT will be compared with the effectively implanted stent size
Procedural
Stent expansion
Time Frame: Procedural
Expressed as the minimal stent area (MSA) determined by IVUS, divided by the reference luminal area in the healthy distal landing zone
Procedural
Calcium modification
Time Frame: Procedural
Prediction of calcium modification pre-IVUS compared with IVUS based strategy of calcium modification
Procedural
Calcified lesions
Time Frame: Procedural
Calcium score as determined by 3DCT will be correlated with the maximum calcium arc on IVUS
Procedural
MACCE at 30 days follow-up
Time Frame: 30 days after PCI
30 days event rate [death, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, definite or probable stent thrombosis, target lesion failure]
30 days after PCI

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Koen Ameloot, Dr., Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 13, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 8, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

February 8, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 29, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on 3DCT-scan

3
Subscribe