- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05219019
Feasibility of Remote Measures and Assessments in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease (FoRMA-DBS) (FoRMA-DBS)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
This is a single-center, non-randomized pilot observational study to explore the feasibility and tolerability of remotely assessing gait speed, functional mobility and balance measures in patients with Parkinson's disease experiencing medication-refractory tremor, motor complications and/or dyskinesias undergoing initiation of deep brain stimulation therapy. This study explores the feasibility of remotely performing and collecting functional assessments of gait, balance and mobility in the setting of programming deep brain stimulation (DBS).
Ten participants who are deemed surgical candidates for receiving DBS for Parkinson's disease under standard of clinical care processes (neuropsychological testing, neurology consultation and neurosurgery consultation) and have opted for the Abbott DBS system will be enrolled in the study and undergo the pre-surgical and post-surgical visits. A pre-operative in-clinic visit will take place approximately 28 days (day -42) prior to surgical DBS electrode lead implantation. An at-home assessment will take place within 14 days (day -28) of this baseline visit, still prior to surgical DBS electrode lead implantation. Participants will receive care as usual including their first post-operative clinic visit for initial programming (day 28), just like standard of care for DBS patients.
Study Type
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with with Parkinson's disease, as confirmed by the treating investigator, providing written consent to the clinical study
- Participants have been determined by the treating investigator as candidates for DBS
- Participants who have opted to have DBS with the remote-programming capable platform
- Have internet connection at home or wherever participants will be receiving care remotely and be able to participate in telemedicine visits and remote programming
Exclusion Criteria:
- Has already had prior surgical lesioning or deep brain stimulation therapy
- Meets criteria for Parkinson's disease dementia in the opinion of the treating investigator
- Does not have capacity for consent as judged by the treating investigator
- Scores less than 24 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at standard of care DBS screening, indicating, at least, mild cognitive impairment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
PD patients who have elected DBS
Ten individuals with moderate to advanced Parkinson's disease who have elected to undergo deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or internal globus pallidus (GPi) as standard of care for management of Parkinson's disease tremor and/or motor complications
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of remotely assessing gait speed during DBS therapy initiation
Time Frame: 20 weeks
|
A telemedicine platform enabled via the Abbott Infinity device will be used to remotely assess gait speed.
|
20 weeks
|
|
Feasibility of remotely assessing functional mobility during DBS therapy initiation
Time Frame: 20 weeks
|
A telemedicine platform enabled via the Abbott Infinity device will be used to remotely assess functional mobility.
|
20 weeks
|
|
Feasibility of remotely assessing balance during DBS therapy initiation
Time Frame: 20 weeks
|
A telemedicine platform enabled via the Abbott Infinity device will be used to remotely assess balance.
|
20 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mobility assessment: 4 meter walk
Time Frame: days -42, -28, 21, 28, 42, 56, 70, and 84
|
Gait speed as performed during the 4-meter walk: Measured as time taken to walk 4 meters in seconds.
|
days -42, -28, 21, 28, 42, 56, 70, and 84
|
|
Mobility assessment: Timed up and go (TUG)
Time Frame: days -42, -28, 21, 28, 42, 56, 70, and 84
|
The TUG assesses mobility, balance, walking ability and fall risk in older adults and has been validated showing good agreement between in-person and telehealth and raters.
On the command, "go" the patient rises from the chair, walks 3 meters at a comfortable safe pace, turns and walks back to the chair and sits down.
Measured as time taken to complete task in seconds.
|
days -42, -28, 21, 28, 42, 56, 70, and 84
|
|
Mobility assessment: 5 times sit to stand
Time Frame: days -42, -28, 21, 28, 42, 56, 70, and 84
|
This is a timed task that requires the participant to stand from a seated position five times in a row.
Measured as time taken to complete task in seconds.
|
days -42, -28, 21, 28, 42, 56, 70, and 84
|
|
Mobility assessment: 360 degree turns
Time Frame: days -42, -28, 21, 28, 42, 56, 70, and 84
|
The 360 degree turn test is a measure of dynamic balance in which the participant turns in a complete circle.
Measured as time taken to complete task in seconds.
|
days -42, -28, 21, 28, 42, 56, 70, and 84
|
|
Mobility assessment: Activity-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale
Time Frame: days -42, -28, 21, 28, 42, 56, 70, and 84
|
Self-reported confidence in performing 16 activities without losing balance.
Participants rate using an 11-point likert-type scale, from 0% (no confidence) to 100% (completely confident) with 10% increments.
A total score will be calculated as the mean of the items.
|
days -42, -28, 21, 28, 42, 56, 70, and 84
|
|
Mobility assessment: Single-leg stance
Time Frame: Day -28, 21, 42, 56, 70
|
Amount of time participant is able to stand on one leg (performed for each leg), measured in seconds.
|
Day -28, 21, 42, 56, 70
|
|
Movement disorders
Time Frame: day -42 and day 84
|
The Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Parts I-IV The Movement Disorder Society's Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scales (MDS-UPDRS) consists of 65 items across four domains: non-motor experiences, motor experiences, a motor examination, and motor complications, rated from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Subscales and a total score are calculated by adding items. A higher score is a worse outcome and indicates more severe symptoms of Parkinson's disease. |
day -42 and day 84
|
|
Quality of Life in PD
Time Frame: day -42 and day 84
|
The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) will be used to assess living difficulties across 8 dimensions of daily living including mobility subscores. The PDQ-39 assesses life concerns of individuals with PD. It is composed of a summary index and eight domain scores-mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma, social support, cognitions, communication, and bodily discomfort. Each item is rated on a 0 (never) to 4 (always) scale. A higher score indicates a higher self-perceived frequency of quality of life and health problems in the past month that are due to the disease, with each domain normed to a scale on which 0 indicating never a problem and 100 always a problem. The summary index is the average of the normed domain scores. A higher score is a worse outcome for quality of life. |
day -42 and day 84
|
|
Change in 3-day step count before DBS
Time Frame: day -42, day 84
|
Step count will be measured continuously by a StepWatch4 over a 3 day period.
|
day -42, day 84
|
|
Change in amount of time spent with tremor and dyskinesia
Time Frame: baseline, day 84
|
The amount of time spent with tremor and dyskinesia will be measured with the Apple watch.
|
baseline, day 84
|
|
Patient global impression of change
Time Frame: baseline, day 28, 42, 56, 70 and 84
|
The Patient Global Impression - Improvement scale (CGI-I) is a 7 point scale, from 1 (normal) through to 7 (amongst the most severely ill), that requires the patient to assess how much their illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the study.
Higher scores reflect more severe illness.
|
baseline, day 28, 42, 56, 70 and 84
|
|
Clinician global impression of change
Time Frame: baseline, day 28, 42, 56, 70 and 84
|
The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement scale (CGI-I) is a 7 point scale, from 1 (normal) through to 7 (amongst the most severely ill), that requires the clinician to assess how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the study.
Higher scores reflect more severe illness.
|
baseline, day 28, 42, 56, 70 and 84
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ludy Shih, MD MMSc, Boston Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Weaver FM, Follett K, Stern M, Hur K, Harris C, Marks WJ Jr, Rothlind J, Sagher O, Reda D, Moy CS, Pahwa R, Burchiel K, Hogarth P, Lai EC, Duda JE, Holloway K, Samii A, Horn S, Bronstein J, Stoner G, Heemskerk J, Huang GD; CSP 468 Study Group. Bilateral deep brain stimulation vs best medical therapy for patients with advanced Parkinson disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009 Jan 7;301(1):63-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.929.
- Schuepbach WM, Rau J, Knudsen K, Volkmann J, Krack P, Timmermann L, Halbig TD, Hesekamp H, Navarro SM, Meier N, Falk D, Mehdorn M, Paschen S, Maarouf M, Barbe MT, Fink GR, Kupsch A, Gruber D, Schneider GH, Seigneuret E, Kistner A, Chaynes P, Ory-Magne F, Brefel Courbon C, Vesper J, Schnitzler A, Wojtecki L, Houeto JL, Bataille B, Maltete D, Damier P, Raoul S, Sixel-Doering F, Hellwig D, Gharabaghi A, Kruger R, Pinsker MO, Amtage F, Regis JM, Witjas T, Thobois S, Mertens P, Kloss M, Hartmann A, Oertel WH, Post B, Speelman H, Agid Y, Schade-Brittinger C, Deuschl G; EARLYSTIM Study Group. Neurostimulation for Parkinson's disease with early motor complications. N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 14;368(7):610-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205158.
- Li D, Zhang C, Gault J, Wang W, Liu J, Shao M, Zhao Y, Zeljic K, Gao G, Sun B. Remotely Programmed Deep Brain Stimulation of the Bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus for the Treatment of Primary Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Deep Brain Stimulation System. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2017;95(3):174-182. doi: 10.1159/000475765. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
- GBD 2016 Parkinson's Disease Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of Parkinson's disease, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Nov;17(11):939-953. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30295-3. Epub 2018 Oct 1. Erratum In: Lancet Neurol. 2021 Dec;20(12):e7.
- Kalia LV, Lang AE. Parkinson's disease. Lancet. 2015 Aug 29;386(9996):896-912. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61393-3. Epub 2015 Apr 19.
- Deuschl G, Schade-Brittinger C, Krack P, Volkmann J, Schafer H, Botzel K, Daniels C, Deutschlander A, Dillmann U, Eisner W, Gruber D, Hamel W, Herzog J, Hilker R, Klebe S, Kloss M, Koy J, Krause M, Kupsch A, Lorenz D, Lorenzl S, Mehdorn HM, Moringlane JR, Oertel W, Pinsker MO, Reichmann H, Reuss A, Schneider GH, Schnitzler A, Steude U, Sturm V, Timmermann L, Tronnier V, Trottenberg T, Wojtecki L, Wolf E, Poewe W, Voges J; German Parkinson Study Group, Neurostimulation Section. A randomized trial of deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 31;355(9):896-908. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa060281. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2006 Sep 21;355(12):1289.
- Collomb-Clerc A, Welter ML. Effects of deep brain stimulation on balance and gait in patients with Parkinson's disease: A systematic neurophysiological review. Neurophysiol Clin. 2015 Nov;45(4-5):371-88. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
- Dorsey ER, Achey MA, Beck CA, Beran DB, Biglan KM, Boyd CM, Schmidt PN, Simone R, Willis AW, Galifianakis NB, Katz M, Tanner CM, Dodenhoff K, Ziman N, Aldred J, Carter J, Jimenez-Shahed J, Hunter C, Spindler M, Mari Z, Morgan JC, McLane D, Hickey P, Gauger L, Richard IH, Bull MT, Mejia NI, Bwala G, Nance M, Shih L, Anderson L, Singer C, Zadikoff C, Okon N, Feigin A, Ayan J, Vaughan C, Pahwa R, Cooper J, Webb S, Dhall R, Hassan A, Weis D, DeMello S, Riggare SS, Wicks P, Smith J, Keenan HT, Korn R, Schwarz H, Sharma S, Stevenson EA, Zhu W. National Randomized Controlled Trial of Virtual House Calls for People with Parkinson's Disease: Interest and Barriers. Telemed J E Health. 2016 Jul;22(7):590-8. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0191. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
- Beck CA, Beran DB, Biglan KM, Boyd CM, Dorsey ER, Schmidt PN, Simone R, Willis AW, Galifianakis NB, Katz M, Tanner CM, Dodenhoff K, Aldred J, Carter J, Fraser A, Jimenez-Shahed J, Hunter C, Spindler M, Reichwein S, Mari Z, Dunlop B, Morgan JC, McLane D, Hickey P, Gauger L, Richard IH, Mejia NI, Bwala G, Nance M, Shih LC, Singer C, Vargas-Parra S, Zadikoff C, Okon N, Feigin A, Ayan J, Vaughan C, Pahwa R, Dhall R, Hassan A, DeMello S, Riggare SS, Wicks P, Achey MA, Elson MJ, Goldenthal S, Keenan HT, Korn R, Schwarz H, Sharma S, Stevenson EA, Zhu W; Connect.Parkinson Investigators. National randomized controlled trial of virtual house calls for Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2017 Sep 12;89(11):1152-1161. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004357. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
- Ma Y, Miao S, Zhou R, Zhang Q, Chen H, Liang Y. Application of Remote Deep Brain Stimulation Programming for Parkinson's Disease Patients. World Neurosurg. 2021 Mar;147:e255-e261. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.030. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
- Powers R, Etezadi-Amoli M, Arnold EM, Kianian S, Mance I, Gibiansky M, Trietsch D, Alvarado AS, Kretlow JD, Herrington TM, Brillman S, Huang N, Lin PT, Pham HA, Ullal AV. Smartwatch inertial sensors continuously monitor real-world motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease. Sci Transl Med. 2021 Feb 3;13(579):eabd7865. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abd7865.
- Soileau MJ, Persad C, Taylor J, Patil PG, Chou KL. Caregiver burden in patients with Parkinson disease undergoing deep brain stimulation: an exploratory analysis. J Parkinsons Dis. 2014;4(3):517-21. doi: 10.3233/JPD-140380.
- Xu J, Wang J, Keith S, Zhang M, Yang C, Yuan Q, Qiu Y, Hu X, Wu X. Management of Parkinson's disease patients after DBS by remote programming: preliminary application of single center during quarantine of 2019-nCoV. J Neurol. 2021 Apr;268(4):1295-1303. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10273-z. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
- Chen Y, Hao H, Chen H, Li L. The study on a telemedicine interaction mode for Deep Brain Stimulation postoperative follow-up. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:186-9. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318331.
- Zhang C, Zhu K, Lin Z, Huang P, Pan Y, Sun B, Li D. Utility of Deep Brain Stimulation Telemedicine for Patients With Movement Disorders During the COVID-19 Outbreak in China. Neuromodulation. 2021 Feb;24(2):337-342. doi: 10.1111/ner.13274. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
- Zhang J, Hu W, Chen H, Meng F, Li L, Okun MS. Implementation of a Novel Bluetooth Technology for Remote Deep Brain Stimulation Programming: The Pre- and Post-COVID-19 Beijing Experience. Mov Disord. 2020 Jun;35(6):909-910. doi: 10.1002/mds.28098. Epub 2020 Jun 1. No abstract available.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- H-41349
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.