Effects of t-DCS and Cognitive Training on Apathy in Elderly With Minor Neurocognitive Impairment (FAME3)

January 29, 2024 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

Effects of t-DCS Combined With Concurrent Cognitive Training on Apathy in Elderly Subjects With Minor Neurocognitive Impairment

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique using a low intensity electric current to modify cortical excitability. Apathy is a pervasive neuropsychiatric symptom characterized by a reduction in goal-directed behavior and activity that persists over time and causes identifiable functional impairment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of repeated sessions of tDCS combined with simultaneous cognitive training on apathy in older people with minor neurocognitive disorders.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique using a low intensity electric current to modify cortical excitability. There is growing interest for tDCS for psychiatric illnesses, notably for depression.

Apathy is a pervasive neuropsychiatric symptom characterized by a reduction in goal-directed behavior and activity that persists over time and causes identifiable functional impairment. tDCS could be a promising new area for non-pharmacological treatment of apathy.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of repeated sessions of tDCS combined with simultaneous cognitive training on apathy in older people with minor neurocognitive disorders. For this, 30 apathetic subjects with minor neurocognitive disorders will be included and randomized between two groups. The intervention group will follow sessions of tDCS combined with a simultaneous cognitive training on tablet. The control group will follow cognitive training with a combined sham tDCS. Intervention will last for 4-week with 3 sessions per week (12 sessions). Stimulation will be performed with Startim 20 (Neuroelectrics®) which is approved by the European Union as a Class IIa medical device and meeting European safety standards. Stimulation will last for 20 minutes and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (F3) will be targeted. For the intervention group, the electric current will be 2mA. Assessments will be done at baseline, just after the end of intervention and 3 months after intervention. Apathy, daily functional motor behaviors, cognitive functions and fatigue will be assessed with clinician assessment, self-administered questionnaires, ambulatory actigraphy and cognitive tests. The assessments and the intervention will be done by different people. Study will be a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nice, France, 06000
        • Centre Memoire Ressources et Recherche, CHU de Nice

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 65 years
  • Subject consulting in one of the investigating centers
  • Clinical diagnosis of Minor Neurocognitive Disorder according to DSM 5 criteria (APA, 2013)
  • Apathetic syndrome defined according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Apathy (Miller & al., 2021)
  • Subject who can read and write French
  • Subjects who are beneficiaries of a social security plan
  • Signature of free and informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current clinical diagnosis of a depressive episode characterized by DSM 5 criteria (APA, 2013)
  • Known diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, substance abuse or dependence
  • Significant sensory or motor impairment
  • Subject under guardianship, conservatorship, or conservatorship
  • Active smoking or smoking cessation of less than one year
  • Contraindications to the practice of tDCS: history of intracranial hypertension, neurosurgery, metallic implant at the cephalic level, pacemaker
  • Unbalanced epilepsy
  • Severe somatic disease not stabilized
  • Previous use of tDCS (problem of maintaining the integrity of the blinding procedure)
  • Scalp skin disease
  • Concurrent participation in another drug research study or any other study that may interfere with study results

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: tDCS combined with simultaneous cognitive training
The intervention group will follow sessions of tDCS combined with a simultaneous cognitive training on tablet
Sham Comparator: cognitive training with a combined sham tDCS
The control group will follow cognitive training with a combined sham tDCS. Intervention will last for 4-week with 3 sessions per week (12 sessions).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Apathy Inventory (Robert et al., 2002), clinician version
Time Frame: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)
The Apathy Inventory scored from 0 (No problem) to 4 (major problem) the 3 dimensions of apathy: the emotional blunting, the loss of initiative and the loss of interest. A higher total score indicates a greater severity.
Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of neuropsychiatric symptoms
Time Frame: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)
Clinician assess behavioral symptoms and scored the severity from 0 to 3.
Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)
Assessment of the global cognitive functioning
Time Frame: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

Mini mental state examination (MMSE): test for asses the global cognitive functioning

Unit of measure: score

Scored from 0 to 30. A lower score indicate lower performance in global cognitive functioning.

Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)
Assessment of cognitive functions with FAB
Time Frame: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

Frontal assessment battery (FAB): test for asses global executive functions

Unit of measure: score

Scored from 0 to 18. A lower score indicate lower performance in global executive functions.

Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)
Assessment of episodic memory
Time Frame: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

Grober and Bruschke test : test for asses episodic memory

Unit of measure: score

Scored from 0 to 48. A lower score indicate lower performance in episodic memory

Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)
Assessment of attention and mental flexibilty
Time Frame: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

Trail Making test A_b: test for attention and mental flexibilty

Unit of measure: time to realize the test

A longer time indicate a lower performance in attention and mental flexibility.

Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)
Assessment of working memory
Time Frame: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

Empan de chiffres: test for asses working memory

Unit of measure: score

A lower score indicate a lower performance in working memory

Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)
Assessment of verbal fluency
Time Frame: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

Fluency test: test for asses verbal fluency

Unit of measure: number of words produced by the participant into 60 seconds

A lower score indicate a lower performance.

Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)
Assessment of language
Time Frame: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

Test de "dénomination d'image": test for asses language

Unit of measure: score

A lower score indicate a lower performance.

Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)
Assessment of fatigue with Multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

Multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI): 20-item self-report questionnaire for measuring five dimensions of fatigue.

Each subscale contains four items, which are scored on a five-point Likert-scale.

Scores range from 4 (absence of fatigue) to 20 (maximum fatigue) for each subscale.

Unit of measure: score

Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)
Assessment of fatigue with 15-sec Sustained maximal handgrip contraction
Time Frame: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

15-sec Sustained maximal handgrip contraction: The decrease in force during the 15-s was used as the indicator of fatigability.

Measure: performance for the test: The decrease in force during the 15-s was used as the indicator of fatigability. It was computed as the difference between the area under constant curve equal to the maximal grip force and the area under the force-time curve of 15-s

Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)
Assessment of daily physical activity
Time Frame: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)
Actigraphy: assessment of time physical activity of light, moderate and vigorous intensity and sedentary time in daily life in minute and % of daily activity.
Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)
Assessment of tDCS adverse effects questionnaire
Time Frame: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

tDCS adverse effects questionnaire: questionnaire for asses the tDCS adverse effects.

It is a 11-item scale. Each item corresponds to an adverse effect. Each item is scored from 1 (absence of the adverse effect) to 4 (severe). If the adverse effect is present (score>1) the clinician scored if this is related to tdCS from 0 (none) to 5 (definite).

A higher score indicate more adverse effects.

Unit of measure: score

Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eric ETTORE, MD, Nice University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 4, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 4, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 10, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 21-PP-15

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neurocognitive Disorders

Clinical Trials on tDCS

3
Subscribe