Timing of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Combined With Speech and Language Therapy (SLT)

July 24, 2022 updated by: Leora Cherney, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Timing of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Combined With Speech and Language Therapy (SLT): An Intervention Development Study for Aphasia

Aphasia is an acquired (typically left-hemisphere) multi-modality disturbance of language that impacts around 2 million people in the USA. Aphasia impacts language production and comprehension as well as reading and writing. The ramifications of aphasia extend beyond language impairment to negatively impacting a person's social, vocational, and recreational activities. Currently, the most effective way to treat aphasia is with speech-language therapy (SLT). However, even if SLT is intensive, persons with aphasia are left with residual language delays. Recent research suggests that pairing SLT with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) a non-invasive, safe, low-cost form of brain stimulation may aid language recovery in persons with aphasia. However, results from tDCS studies are inconclusive. The success of tDCS in combination with SLT could depend on the timing of tDCS since tDCS-induced effects depend on the neuronal state of the brain-networks at the time of the stimulation. In this study, the differential impact of tDCS before behavioral SLT (offline-before therapy), tDCS after SLT (offline-after therapy), and tDCS concurrently with SLT (online) on functional language recovery in persons with aphasia will be investigated. Sham tDCS (i.e., SLT alone) as a control group will also be included in the study. The investigators hypothesize that both offline and online tDCS will improve language functioning than sham tDCS.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

tDCS Implementation:

2mA of direct current for 20 minutes will be delivered using a constant current stimulator via two electrodes in saline soaked sponges. To stimulate the left angular gyrus, a cathodal electrode inside a saline soaked sponge (5 x 3cm) will be placed over the CP5 according to the 10-20 international system for EEG electrode placement. The electrodes will be secured in position by a custom-built EEG cap that will be marked with the location for angular gyrus. The investigators will then confirm that the cathodal electrode is over the left angular through the use of neuronavigation. The "return" anode electrode will be placed in a saline soaked sponge (5 x 5cm) on the center of the supraorbital region.

At the beginning of the tDCS, current will slowly ram-up during the first few seconds until it reaches 2mA. The ramp-up process will acclimate the participants to tDCS-induced sensations (e.g., itching). At the end of the tDCS sessions, current will slowly ramp down in the last few seconds to 0mA. The total duration of the 2mA current will be maintained for 20 minutes. For sham stimulation, the investigators will place the electrodes in the same location as the real tDCS groups with stimulation ending after few seconds. The brief stimulation will produce tDCS-induced sensations so that participants will not be aware when the tDCS stopped delivering direct current

Speech-Language Treatment:

Standard-of-care treatment - script training will be used to provide SLT to our participants. The treatment will be delivered via a computer program, Aphasia Scripts ®, whereby a virtual therapist interactively guides the participants through treatment steps. Scripts will be five to ten sentences and developed from common templates about topics relevant to daily life (e.g., asking questions at the grocery store, ordering in a restaurant). The advantage of using a computer program instead of a human therapist is that it removes extraneous variables associated with human therapists (e.g., different levels of encouragement) and this, together with the use of script templates, ensures treatment fidelity across participants.

Duration of an individual subject's participation in the study:

Subjects will be requested to come for baseline sessions (3 to 4 hours) before the actual experiment. The baseline assessments may be done over two visits. In the baseline session the subjects' aphasia severity will be assessed. The participants will also perform baseline tasks of language and cognition in this session. Subjects will then participate in 3 weeks of tDCS and SLT (i.e., 15 sessions). The sessions will consist of 40 minutes of SLT and 20 minutes of tDCS. Subjects will be asked to return for an assessment immediately following the end of treatment and for follow-up testing after 4 and 8 weeks. Therefore, total number of visits will be 19-23 sessions (depending on how many visits are needed for the assessments) over a period of three months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Recruiting
        • Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Leora Cherney, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men or women with diagnosis of fluent or non-fluent aphasia subsequent to a left-hemisphere infarct(s) that is confirmed by a MRI or CT scan
  • Aphasia quotient on the WAB of 35-85
  • At least 6 months post onset of aphasia (this is beyond the stage of spontaneous recovery)
  • 18- 80 years of age
  • Premorbidly fluent in English
  • Premorbidly right-hand dominant per the Edinburg Handedness Inventory
  • Visual acuity of 20/40 corrected
  • Auditory acuity no worse than 30 dB HL on pure tone testing, aided in the better ear.
  • Education greater than 12th grade

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any other neurological condition (other than cerebral vascular disease) that could impact language and cognition such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, primary progressive aphasia, and traumatic brain injury
  • Active substance use
  • Individuals with epilepsy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Offline tDCS-before therapy
Participants will receive 20 minutes of tDCS prior to the 40 minute speech-language therapy session.
Direct current stimulation will be delivered using a battery-driven constant current stimulator. 2mA of direct current will be applied for 20 minutes to the angular gyrus region of the brain. We will use a standard-of-care treatment - script training - to provide speech-language therapy to our subjects. The scripting treatment will be delivered by a computer program that provides script training in an interactive conversational context.
Active Comparator: Offline tDCS-after therapy
Participants will receive 20 minutes of tDCS after the 40 minute speech-language therapy session.
Direct current stimulation will be delivered using a battery-driven constant current stimulator. 2mA of direct current will be applied for 20 minutes to the angular gyrus region of the brain. We will use a standard-of-care treatment - script training - to provide speech-language therapy to our subjects. The scripting treatment will be delivered by a computer program that provides script training in an interactive conversational context.
Active Comparator: Online tDCS
tDCS will be applied at the beginning of the 40 minute speech-language therapy session and will last for 20 minutes.
Direct current stimulation will be delivered using a battery-driven constant current stimulator. 2mA of direct current will be applied for 20 minutes to the angular gyrus region of the brain. We will use a standard-of-care treatment - script training - to provide speech-language therapy to our subjects. The scripting treatment will be delivered by a computer program that provides script training in an interactive conversational context.
Sham Comparator: Sham tDCS
Sham tDCS will be applied at the beginning of the 40 minute speech-language therapy session.
Stimulation will be given for a total 30 seconds (including ramp-up and ramp-down of current) and then the tDCS device will be turned off. The brief stimulation will produce tDCS-induced sensation so that participants will not be aware when the tDCS was turned off .We will use standard-of-care treatment - script training - to provide speech-language therapy to our subjects. The scripting treatment will be delivered by a computer program that provides script training in an interactive conversational context.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in trained conversational script.
Time Frame: 3 weeks.
Changes in accuracy and rate of production on a trained conversational script from pre to post-treatment.
3 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in untrained conversational script
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Changes in accuracy and rate of production on an untrained conversational script from pre to post-treatment.
3 weeks
Change in the Aphasia Quotient (AQ) of Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R)
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Changes in WAB-R AQ from pre and post treatment.
3 weeks
Maintenance of trained conversational script
Time Frame: 7 weeks
Accuracy and rate of production of trained conversational script at 4 weeks post-treatment
7 weeks
Maintenance of trained conversational script
Time Frame: 11 weeks
Accuracy and rate of production of trained conversational script at 8 weeks post-treatment
11 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Leora Cherney, PhD, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 3, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aphasia

  • Teachers College, Columbia University
    Recruiting
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia Non Fluent | Aphasia, Anomic | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Aphasia, Mixed | Aphasia, Expressive | Aphasia, Conduction | Aphasia, Rehabilitation
    United States
  • University of California, Berkeley
    University of California, San Francisco; National Institute on Deafness and... and other collaborators
    Recruiting
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Aphasia, Non-fluent | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia Following Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage
    United States
  • University of South Carolina
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Completed
    Stroke | Aphasia | Stroke, Ischemic | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia, Anomic | Aphasia, Global | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia, Mixed | Aphasia, Jargon | Aphasia, Expressive | Aphasia, Conduction
    United States
  • Maya Henry
    National Institute on Aging (NIA)
    Recruiting
    Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia | Progressive Aphasia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia (LPA) | Primary Progressive Aphasia(PPA) | Logopenic Variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia (LPA) | Progressive Aphasia in Alzheimer's Disease
    United States
  • Maya Henry
    National Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute on Aging (NIA)
    Recruiting
    Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (svPPA) | Nonfluent Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (nfvPPA) | Progressive Aphasia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia... and other conditions
    United States
  • University of Texas at Austin
    University of California, San Francisco; National Institute on Deafness and...
    Active, not recruiting
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Aphasia | Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Memory Disorder | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Aphasia, Progressive
    United States
  • University of Texas at Austin
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Enrolling by invitation
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Aphasia | Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Memory Disorder | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Aphasia, Progressive
    United States
  • Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia
    Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona.; Universitat Pompeu Fabra
    Completed
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia, Wernicke | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia, Nonfluent
    Spain
  • Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital
    Not yet recruiting
    Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Post Stroke Aphasia | Acute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease
    India
  • Flint Rehabilitation Devices, LLC
    University of Texas
    Completed
    Broca Aphasia
    United States

Clinical Trials on Offline tDCS-before therapy

Subscribe