Survival Effect of Hepato-celiac Lymphadenectomy In Primary or Relapsed Ovarian Cancer

February 9, 2022 updated by: Shanghai Gynecologic Oncology Group

A Prospective, Single-center, Single-Arm Phase II Clinical Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Hepato-celiac Lymphadenectomy in the Treatment of Advanced and Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and the effectiveness of hepato-celiac lymphadenectomy in the treatment of primarily diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This single-arm, single-center, phase II trial is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of hepato-celiac lymphadenectomy in the treatment of ovarian cancer with hepato-celiac lymph nodes metastases, in the circumstance of primarily diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (primary debulking surgery or interval debulking surgery) and of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (no more than 4 lines of therapy).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

69

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China
        • Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years to ≤ 75 years.
  • Pathologic confirmed stage III or IV epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer or primary peritoneal carcinoma (EOC, PPC, FTC) or platinum sensitive, relapsed EOC, PPC or FTC (no more than 4 lines of therapy)
  • Assessed by the experienced surgeons, complete resection is feasible according to preoperative evaluation
  • 1 to 3 episodes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is allowed in primary settings
  • Platinum sensitive relapse is defined as those with platinum-free interval of 6 months or more.
  • ASA score of 1 to 2
  • ECOG performance status of 0 to 2
  • Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function to receive chemotherapy and subsequently to undergo surgery:
  • White blood cells >3,000/µL, absolute neutrophil count ≥1,500/µL, platelets ≥100,000/µL, hemoglobin ≥9 g/dL,
  • Serum creatinine <1.25 x upper normal limit (UNL) or creatinine clearance ≥60 mL/min according to Cockcroft-Gault formula or to local lab measurement
  • Serum bilirubin <1.25 x UNL, AST(SGOT) and ALT(SGPT) <2.5 x UNL
  • Comply with the study protocol and follow-up.
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with non-epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer or primary peritoneal carcinoma.
  • Low-grade carcinoma.
  • Mucinous ovarian cancer.
  • Infeasible complete resection according to preoperative evaluation
  • Unresectable pulmonary and hepatic parenchymal metastases, multiple thoracic lymph nodes metastases, brain or bone metastases according to preoperative evaluation.
  • Carcinomatosis on small bowel mesentery or intestinal wall by surgical findings and infeasible optimal surgery by bowel resection or peritonectomy.
  • Progression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary settings.
  • Synchronous or metachronous (within 5 years) malignancy other than carcinoma in situ or breast cancer (without any signs of relapse or activity).
  • Any other concurrent medical conditions contraindicating surgery or chemotherapy that could compromise the adherence to the protocol.
  • Other conditions, such as religious, psychological and other factors, that could interfere with provision of informed consent, compliance to study procedures, or follow-up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Hepato-celiac lymphadenectomy
This single-arm, single-center, phase II trial is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of hepato-celiac lymphadenectomy in the treatment of ovarian cancer with hepato-celiac lymph nodes metastases, in the circumstance of primarily diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (primary debulking surgery or interval debulking surgery) and of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (no more than 4 lines of therapy).
Hepato-celiac lymphadenectomy in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer, with a maximum cytoreduction, in the circumstance of primarily diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (primary debulking surgery or interval debulking surgery) and of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (no more than 4 lines of therapy).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
2-years Non-Progression Rate
Time Frame: Participants will be followed up to 2 years after randomization
The proportion of patients without disease progression or death at 2 years after entry into the study.
Participants will be followed up to 2 years after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression free survival
Time Frame: Participants will be followed up to 24 months after randomization
The time from entry into the study to the diagnosis of the first progression or recurrence or death, whichever occurs first
Participants will be followed up to 24 months after randomization
Overall survival
Time Frame: Participants will be followed up to 60 months after randomization
The time from date of randomization until the date of death from any cause or last follow-up
Participants will be followed up to 60 months after randomization
Objective response rate
Time Frame: Participants will be followed up to 24 months after randomization
The proportion of patients who achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)
Participants will be followed up to 24 months after randomization
Disease control rate
Time Frame: Participants will be followed up to 24 months after randomization
The proportion of patients who achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD)
Participants will be followed up to 24 months after randomization
Post-operative complications
Time Frame: Participants will be followed up to 90 days after randomization
Postoperative 30-day, 60-day and 90-day complications
Participants will be followed up to 90 days after randomization
Quality of life assessments (QLQ-C30)
Time Frame: Baseline; 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after randomization
Assessment of potential impact of first line treatment on functionality and well-being in patients by the EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30, version 3.0).
Baseline; 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after randomization
Quality of life assessments (FACT-Q)
Time Frame: Baseline; 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after randomization
Assessment of potential impact of first line treatment on functionality and well-being in patients by functional assessment of cancer therapy-ovary (FACT-O, version 4).
Baseline; 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after randomization
Patterns of subsequent recurrence
Time Frame: Participants will be followed up to 24 months after randomization
The number and sites of subsequent recurrence, including pelvic, abdominal, retroperitoneal lymph nodes, hepato-celiac lymph nodes and distant metastases and ascites, etc.
Participants will be followed up to 24 months after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Rongyu Zang, Fudan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fallopian Tube Cancer

Clinical Trials on Hepato-celiac lymphadenectomy

3
Subscribe