Comparison Between Bilateral Infraorbital Block Versus Intranasal Bupivacaine in Transsphenoidal Pituitary Adenoma Resection

December 23, 2025 updated by: AbdElKhalik Mahmoud Shaban, Cairo University

Comparison Between Hemodynamic Effect of Bilateral Infraorbital Block Versus Intranasal Application of Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Transsphenoidal Pituitary Adenoma Resection.A Comparative Randomized Controlled Study

The study will evaluate the efficacy of bilateral infraorbital nerve block versus preoperative nasal packing with long-acting local anesthetic bupivacaine in term of maintaining hemodynamics intraoperative within 20% below baseline to achieve adequate hypotensive anesthesia and longer duration of postoperative analgesia up to 24 hours in patients undergoing transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Kasr Alaini hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA I, II or III
  • patients scheduled to undergo endoscopic transsphenoidal approach to remove tumor under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's refusal
  • Allergy to local anesthetics.
  • Preoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak.
  • Preoperative cardiac arrythmias.
  • Seizure disorders.
  • Patients with severe endocrinal disorders that affecting the craniofacial morphology as acromegaly and cushinoid features.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A
the patients will receive bilateral infraorbital block
the patients will receive bilateral infraorbital block
Active Comparator: Group B
the patients will receive topical intranasal application of bupivacaine
the patients will receive topical intranasal application of bupivacaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mean arterial blood pressure
Time Frame: at the time of mucosal dissection
at the time of mucosal dissection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraoperative need for magnesium sulphate
Time Frame: the entire duration of surgery
Intraoperative need for iv magnesium sulphate up to 3 mg to maintain blood pressure 20% below baseline
the entire duration of surgery
Intraoperative need for fentanyl
Time Frame: the entire duration of surgery
Intraoperative need for iv fentanyl blouses 0.5 μg/kg (maximum total dose 5 μg/kg for the entire procedure) if no response to magnesium sulphate
the entire duration of surgery
Intraoperative need for nitroglycerine
Time Frame: the entire duration of surgery
Intraoperative need for iv nitroglycerine infusion (5 - 100 mic/min iv) if no response to magnesium sulphate and fentanyl
the entire duration of surgery
Postoperative need of pethidine
Time Frame: 24 hours postoprative
Postoperative need of pethidine boluses 25 mg with max.100 mg
24 hours postoprative
Postoperative pain assessed by Numeric pain score
Time Frame: 24 hours postoprative
Pain score will be assessed postoperatively (using the verbal Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] 0-100; 0 = Non ,100 = Worst imaginable pain)
24 hours postoprative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 2, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 31, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intraoperative Hypertension

Clinical Trials on infraorbital block

Subscribe