Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation During Pediatric Dental Surgery (Laryngoscopy)

December 16, 2020 updated by: Ebru Canakci, T.C. ORDU ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation During Pediatric Dental Surgery: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Background and Objective: Airway control is a condition that should be evaluated primarily in anesthesia practice in the pediatric age group. Failed intubation or prolonged intubation duration can cause atelectasis and hypoxia in children. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of Macintosh laryngoscopy and McGrath videolaryngoscopy on hemodynamic parameters in pediatric patients who were scheduled to undergo elective dental surgery and required intubation for the application of general anesthesia.

Methods: Sixty-six patients were divided into two groups according to the procedure used during intubation, namely, direct laryngoscopy or video laryngoscopy. The Cormack-Lehane and Mallampati scores, intubation duration, heart rate at minutes 0, 1, 3 and 5 during intubation, mean arterial pressure, EtCO2and SpO2 values were recorded for all the patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Many techniques in the management of a difficult airway have been used in adult patients. In pediatric patients, awake fiberoptic intubation is difficult or even impossible . The video laryngoscope is a new tool produced by combining video technology and laryngoscope. Published studies on the video laryngoscope were mostly performed in adults . In this study, we used a Macintosh laryngoscope, which is a routinely used tool in anesthesiology, and a McGrath video laryngoscope, which is a type of a newly developed video laryngoscope that has not widely been used in the pediatric age group. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of Macintosh laryngoscopy and McGrath videolaryngoscopy on hemodynamic parameters in pediatric patients who were scheduled to undergo elective dental surgery and required intubation for the application of general anesthesia. We also evaluated whether Macintosh laryngoscopy and McGrath videolaryngoscopy improved the stress response and whether these approaches facilitated the intubation procedure.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ordu, Turkey, 52200
        • Ordu University School of Medicine ,Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 13 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study included 66 ASA I-II patients with an age range of 4-13 years and who were scheduled for elective dental surgery under general anesthesia with intubation.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Healthy children between the ages of 4-13

  • Ordu University School of Medicine ,pediatric age group ,elective oral surgery 4-13 years and who were scheduled for elective oral surgery under general anesthesia with intubation If Patients with a Cormack -Lehane score 1,2 or 3 and if Mallampathy score of 1,2 or 3 were inccluded from the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. With malignancy disease patients
  2. with norological disorders
  3. with congenital heart disease
  4. with airway abnormality
  5. with airway disease patients
  6. Patients age Under 4 years , Above 13 years
  7. If Patients with a Cormack -Lehane score 4 and if Mallampathy score of 4 were excluded from the study -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Group Direct Laringoscopy
Group DL: Group of patients intubated using a Macintoch blade laryngoscope.
During the intubation, the head of the patient was kept in a neutral position, patients were nasotracheally intubated
Group Videolaringoscopy
Group VL: Group of patients intubated using a McGrath video laryngoscope.
During the intubation, the head of the patient was kept in a neutral position, patients were nasotracheally intubated

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart Rate
Time Frame: During surgery 0. minute
Heart Rate (HR)
During surgery 0. minute
Heart Rate
Time Frame: During surgery 1. minute
Heart Rate (HR)
During surgery 1. minute
Heart Rate
Time Frame: During surgery 3. minute
Heart Rate (HR)
During surgery 3. minute
Heart Rate
Time Frame: During surgery 5. minute
Heart Rate (HR)
During surgery 5. minute
Heart Rate
Time Frame: During surgery 10. minute
Heart Rate (HR)
During surgery 10. minute
Mean Arterial Pressure
Time Frame: During surgery 0. minute
Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)
During surgery 0. minute
Mean Arterial Pressure
Time Frame: During surgery 1. minute
Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)
During surgery 1. minute
Mean Arterial Pressure
Time Frame: During surgery 3. minute
Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)
During surgery 3. minute
Mean Arterial Pressure
Time Frame: During surgery 5. minute
Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)
During surgery 5. minute
Mean Arterial Pressure
Time Frame: During surgery 10. minute
Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)
During surgery 10. minute
Saturation
Time Frame: During surgery 0. minute
SpO2
During surgery 0. minute
Saturation
Time Frame: During surgery 1. minute
SpO2
During surgery 1. minute
Saturation
Time Frame: During surgery 3. minute
SpO2
During surgery 3. minute
Saturation
Time Frame: During surgery 5. minute
SpO2
During surgery 5. minute
Saturation
Time Frame: During surgery 10. minute
SpO2
During surgery 10. minute
End Tidal Carbondioxide
Time Frame: During surgery 0. minute
EtCO2
During surgery 0. minute
End Tidal Carbondioxide
Time Frame: During surgery 1. minute
EtCO2
During surgery 1. minute
End Tidal Carbondioxide
Time Frame: During surgery 3. minute
EtCO2
During surgery 3. minute
End Tidal Carbondioxide
Time Frame: During surgery 5. minute
EtCO2
During surgery 5. minute
End Tidal Carbondioxide
Time Frame: During surgery 10. minute
EtCO2
During surgery 10. minute

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Entubation Time
Time Frame: During Surgery 1.minute
Entubation time , (minute)
During Surgery 1.minute
Entubation Time
Time Frame: During Surgery 2.minute
Entubation time , (minute)
During Surgery 2.minute
Entubation Time
Time Frame: During Surgery 3.minute
Entubation time , (minute)
During Surgery 3.minute

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ebru Canakci, MD, Ordu University School of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
  • Study Chair: Ahmet Gultekin, MD, Namık Kemal University School of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 21, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Airway Complication of Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on Laryngoscopy

Subscribe