Substance Use and Eating Disorders : Food Craving and Addiction Transfer (SUED)

Substance Use Disorder (SUD) and Eating Disorders (ED) are severe and persistent disturbances that are associated with significant harm. These two disorders have many clinical similarities, including craving and behavioral loss of control. Recently, craving for food has been described in newly abstinent patients with SUD. the aim of the study is to verify the hypothesis of addiction transfer based on common neurobiological mechanisms between substance craving and food craving, that postulates that food craving would correspond to an attempt to regulate substance craving (or vice versa).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The knowledge of existence of common addictive, neurobiological and clinical processes between substance use disorders and eating disorders has been a promising approach for a better understanding of the factors involved in the emergence and maintenance of these disorders. Several studies have shown that increased palatable food with high sugar or fat content causes brain neurochemistry changes similar to those observed after use of addictive drugs. Clinical and behavioral similarities concerning craving, loss of control and use as a coping strategy have also been highlighted. Craving is considered as a clinical marker of addiction and a potent predictor of relapse vulnerability. In substance addiction, the link between craving, use and relapse has been previously demonstrated in experimental and daily life studies. The main objective of this study is to examine the hypothesis of addiction transfer between Substance Use Disorders and Eating Disorders, according to which food craving for palatable foods would correspond to an attempt to regulate substance craving or vice versa. One assumption is that food intake could be used to alleviate craving for substances in patients hospitalized for substance use disorder. The secondary objective is to explore psychopathological, addictive, and medical similarities between substance use disorder and eating disorder participants. Included patients (group 1: substance use disorder participants and group 2: eating disorder) will be asked to answer different self-questionnaires, as well as a clinical psychiatric (MINI) and cognitive (MoCA) assessment.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

294

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gironde
      • Bordeaux, Gironde, France, 33000
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-5 diagnostic criteria for substance use disorder/behavioral addiction (gambling) or DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for eating disorders (Anorexia nervosa, Bulimia nervosa, Hyperphagia access)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for substance use disorder/behavioral addiction (gambling) or an eating disorder (Anorexia nervosa, Bulimia nervosa or Hyperphagia access).
  • Begin treatment in addiction complex care unit, located in inter-hospital unit Charles Perrens Hospital and Bordeaux University Hospital
  • Non-opposition formulated

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severely impaired physical and/or mental health that, according to the investigator, may affect the participant's compliance with the study and understanding of assessment tools
  • Trouble in understanding/writing French
  • Hospitalization for less than 3-weeks for patients with substance use disorders or behavioral addiction (gambling)
  • Individuals participating in another study that includes an ongoing exclusion period.
  • Be under guardianship
  • Pregnant and/or lactating woman

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Epidemiology

Inpatients who initiate treatment for a substance use disorder (SUD) will have to complete self-questionnaires, a clinical psychiatric assessment (MINI) and a cognitive assessment (MoCA).

These participants will be assessed at admission in addiction unit and at discharge, 3 weeks after withdrawal.

Outpatients who begin treatment for an eating disorder (ED) will have to complete self-questionnaires and a clinical psychiatric assessment (MINI) at the beginning of the outpatient treatment program

Patients treated for substance use disorders and patients treated for eating disorders will have to complete self-questionnaires and a clinical psychiatric (MINI) at the inclusion.

Patients suffering from substance use disorder will be assessed 3 weeks after inclusion.

Questionnaires are :

  • Modified Yale Food Addiction (mYFAS 2.0) and Impulsive Behavior Scale (UPPS-P)
  • Trait Meta-Mood Scale (TMMS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADs), Emotional Appetite Questionnaire (EMAQ), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) and Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ)
  • Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q), Rosenberg's Self Esteem (RSE) and Ruminative Response Scale for Eating disorders (RRS-ED)
  • Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Craving for substance
Time Frame: At the inclusion
Measurement of craving for substances by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) - from 0 (no desire at all) to 10 (very much in demand) / higher scores mean a worse outcome
At the inclusion
Craving for substance
Time Frame: At week-3
Measurement of craving for substances by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) - from 0 (no desire at all) to 10 (very much in demand) / higher scores mean a worse outcome
At week-3
Craving for food
Time Frame: At the inclusion
Measurement of food craving by Food Cravings Questionnaire-Trait-Reduced (FCQ-Tr) - from NEVER to ALLWAYS / higher scores mean a worse or better outcome, depending of the question
At the inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Identify common determinants of food craving in patients suffering from ED
Time Frame: At inclusion
Questionnaires for Addictive characteristics : Modified Yale Food Addiction
At inclusion
Identify common determinants of food craving in patients suffering from ED & SUD - Addictive characteristics :
Time Frame: At inclusion
Impulsive Behavior Scale 4-point Likert scale: 1 (Agree Strongly), 2 (Agree Some), 3 (Disagree Some), and 4 (Disagree Strongly)
At inclusion
Identify common determinants of food craving in patients suffering from ED & SUD - Emotional characteristics
Time Frame: At inclusion
Trait Meta-Mood Scale from NOT AT ALL AGREE to TOTALLY AGREE / higher scores mean a worse or better outcome, depending of the question
At inclusion
Identify common determinants of food craving in patients suffering from ED & SUD - Psychopathological and cognitive characteristics
Time Frame: At inclusion
Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire, from NEVER to EVERY DAY / higher scores mean a worse or better outcome, depending of the question
At inclusion
Identify Medical characteristics : of food craving in patients suffering from ED - Medical characteristics :
Time Frame: At inclusion
BMI in kg/m²
At inclusion
Identify Medical characteristics : of food craving in patients suffering from SUD
Time Frame: At inclusion and at week-3
BMI in kg/m²
At inclusion and at week-3
Identify cognitive characteristics of food craving in patients suffering from ED
Time Frame: At inclusion
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (21 self-rated items are combined to form seven "component scores", each of which has a range of 0-3 points. In all cases, a score of "0" indicates no difficulty, while a score of "3" indicates severe difficulty. The seven component scores are then added to yield one "global" score, with a range of 0-21 points, "0" indicating no difficulty and "21" indicating severe difficulties in all areas.) Montreal Cognitive Assessment (30-question test - score of 25 and under is considered at-risk of dementia)
At inclusion
Identify cognitive characteristics of food craving in patients suffering from SUD
Time Frame: At inclusion and at week-3
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (21 self-rated items are combined to form seven "component scores", each of which has a range of 0-3 points. In all cases, a score of "0" indicates no difficulty, while a score of "3" indicates severe difficulty. The seven component scores are then added to yield one "global" score, with a range of 0-21 points, "0" indicating no difficulty and "21" indicating severe difficulties in all areas.) Montreal Cognitive Assessment (30-question test - score of 25 and under is considered at-risk of dementia)
At inclusion and at week-3
Identify addictive characteristics of substances craving in patients suffering from SUD
Time Frame: At week-3 At inclusion and at week-3
Impulsive Behavior Scale 4-point Likert scale: 1 (Agree Strongly), 2 (Agree Some), 3 (Disagree Some), and 4 (Disagree Strongly)
At week-3 At inclusion and at week-3
Identify emotional characteristics of substances craving in patients suffering from SUD
Time Frame: At week-3
Trait Meta-Mood Scale, from NOT AT ALL AGREE to TOTALLY AGREE / higher scores mean a worse or better outcome, depending of the question
At week-3
Identify psychopathological characteristics of substances craving in patients suffering from SUD
Time Frame: At week-3
Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire, from NEVER to EVERY DAY / higher scores mean a worse or better outcome, depending of the question
At week-3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mélina FATSEAS, Prof, MD, Physician

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Substance Use Disorders

Clinical Trials on Questionnaire

Subscribe