Quality of Life in Patients With Difficult-to-Treat Basal Cell Carcinoma: An Evaluation of Impact and Surgical Outcomes. (FACE-QOL)

Assessment of Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Difficult-to-treat Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Face in Stage IIA or IIIB According to the European Association of Dermato-Oncology Classification.

FACE-QoL is an observational, prospective, multicenter study aimed at evaluating the impact of surgical treatment on quality of life in patients with stage IIA and IIIB difficult-to-treat basal cell carcinoma of the face, according to the European Academy of Dermato-Oncology classification, using patient-reported outcomes.

The main questions the study seeks to answer are:

Can surgery, as the gold standard treatment, lead to an improvement in the quality of life of patients with difficult-to-treat basal cell carcinoma in functionally and cosmetically challenging sites of the face (i.e., stage IIA and IIIB)? Which clinical and individual variables have the greatest impact on patients' quality of life? Participants will complete questionnaires assessing their quality of life and the impact of the disease on their daily lives.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

750

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Sequential recruitment of patients undergoing surgery for difficult-to-treat basal cell carcinoma of the face in stage IIA or IIIB, according to the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO) classification.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical or histological diagnosis of difficult-to-treat basal cell carcinoma (DTT-BCC) classified as stage IIA or IIIB according to the EADO classification.
  • Tumor location: face.
  • Intervention: surgical treatment of facial stage IIA and IIIB difficult-to-treat basal cell carcinoma.
  • Sufficient knowledge of spoken and written Italian by the patient.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known psychiatric or substance abuse disorders that may interfere with cooperation and compliance with trial requirements.
  • Inoperable or metastatic difficult-to-treat basal cell carcinoma.
  • Contraindications to surgery related to the patient's condition.
  • Previous radiation therapy involving the field of the target lesion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgery in difficult-to-treat basal cell carcinoma
Time Frame: 1 year
The primary outcome is to assess the change in quality of life in patients with difficult-to-treat basal cell carcinoma (DTT-BCC) of the face (stage IIA and IIIB according to the European Association of Dermato-Oncology classification) before and after surgery, as measured by various questionnaires.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Predictive variables
Time Frame: 1 year
A secondary endpoint is to identify which clinical and individual variables have the greatest impact on patients' quality of life (e.g., age, gender, tumor site or size, primary vs. recurrent, type of reconstruction, etc.).
1 year
Validation of the NAFEQ score.
Time Frame: 1 year
A secondary endpoint is to validate the Italian version of the NAFEQ score (Nasal Appearance and Function Evaluation Questionnaire) to assess the impact of surgery on quality of life in patients with DTT-BCCs of the nose (including various nasal subunits, such as the dorsum, ala, side wall, tip, etc.). The questionnaire consists of 14 questions directed to patients, with a total score ranging from 18 to 66, where a score of 66 indicates post-surgical clinical and aesthetic improvement.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrea Paradisi, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 3, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Basal Cell Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)

Subscribe