Evaluating Scaleup of an Adapted Breast Cancer Early Diagnosis Program in Rwanda

July 31, 2023 updated by: Lydia Pace, MD, MPH, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Breast cancer incidence is increasing in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and breast cancer mortality is high in these regions largely due to late stage diagnoses. This is true in the low-income East African country of Rwanda, where there are no national protocols in place to guide evaluation and referral of breast symptoms at primary health facilities.

This study will use quantitative and qualitative methods to examine implementation of the Women's Cancer Early Detection Program (WCEDP) in order to understand optimal strategies to scale and sustain breast cancer early diagnosis in Rwanda and other limited-resource settings. The WCEDP is an adaptation of a prior intervention in Burera District, which focused on building community awareness of breast symptoms, improving clinicians' clinical breast assessment (CBA) skills, and implementing weekly breast clinics at the primary health care center and hospital levels. The Burera intervention was associated with improvements in health care workers' knowledge and skills, increases in care-seeking and receipt of care by women with breast symptoms, and an increase in early-stage breast cancer diagnoses.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Despite the Burera trial's promising results it was clear adaptations would be needed for real-world scaleup. The Burera intervention focused on breast health in isolation, hindering scalability in a limited-resource health system. In addition, it benefited from intensive patient tracking, feasible with the study's resources and implementation in a single district. Rwanda Biomedical Centre (RBC) is now scaling up breast cancer early diagnosis using the Burera training program with two key adaptations. First, in an effort to expand reach and increase efficiency, breast cancer early diagnosis services are offered together with cervical cancer screening in a combined initiative, the Women's Cancer Early Detection Program. The WCEDP combines these services through: 1)Combined provider trainings; 2)Community awareness-raising about both cancers; and 3)Weekly district hospital (DH) and HC clinics for women eligible for cervical cancer screening and CBA. RBC's second adaptation, an effort to facilitate patient tracking and linkage to care at scale, is a tablet-based EMR that allows clinicians to share information across facilities, identify missed visits, and document patient phone calls. These adaptations address priorities of the WHO's Global Breast Cancer Initiative: integrating early diagnosis into primary care services and building systems to facilitate referrals. By examining these adaptations in a real-world setting, this research will contribute to global efforts to identify evidence-based implementation strategies to address breast cancer in LMICs.

This study will leverage a longstanding partnership between RBC, Partners In Health (PIH), and Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) to pursue the following Specific Aims:

Aim 1. Use the RE-AIM framework to examine implementation and impact of Rwanda's adaptation and scale-up of breast cancer early diagnosis within the WCEDP, in 3 districts with 52 HCs.

1a. Evaluate the WCEDP's reach using interrupted time series analysis to examine its impact on the number of patients receiving CBA at HCs, and engagement of older women and those with breast symptoms.

1b. Examine program effectiveness, adoption and implementation by assessing timely linkage to care, loss-to-follow-up, service delivery, and EMR use.

Aim 2. Use patient and provider interviews, guided by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework, to elicit contextual factors related to successes and challenges of scaleup, including the WCEDP's fit and acceptability for communities, clinicians, and facilities.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

3096

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Butaro, Rwanda
        • Recruiting
        • Partners in Health (Inshuti Mu Buzima)
        • Contact:
          • Vincent Cubaka, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population is the population served by the health centers that are implementing the nationally-led breast cancer early detection program.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All individuals who are evaluated for a breast concern or receive breast cancer screening through implementation of the nationally-led early detection programs

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients presenting to health centers for CBA per week (Reach)
Time Frame: 12 months
The primary analysis will be interrupted time series (ITS) Poisson regression to compare the number of patients presenting for CBA to health centers each week in the months before and after initiation of the WCEDP
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Age of patients received (Reach)
Time Frame: 18 months
The investigators will examine the median age of individuals presenting before and after WCEDP
18 months
Proportion of patients receiving CBA who had breast symptoms (Reach)
Time Frame: 18 months
Investigators will examine the proportion of patients evaluated at health centers with CBA who had symptoms
18 months
Proportion of patients evaluated with CBA at health centers who also had cervical cancer screening (Reach)
Time Frame: 18 months
Proportion of patients evaluated with CBA at health centers who also had cervical cancer screening (Reach)
18 months
WCEDP Effectiveness - HCs
Time Frame: 12 months
Number and percentage of women seen at health centers for CBA who are referred to district hospitals (and seen within 1 month of DH visit)
12 months
WCEDP Effectiveness - DHs
Time Frame: 12 months
Number and percentage of women seen at district hospitals for CBA who are referred to referral facilities (and seen within 1 month of DH visit)
12 months
WCEDP Adoption - CHWs
Time Frame: 12 months
Number and percentage of community health workers (CHWs) trained
12 months
WCEDP Adoption - Clinicians
Time Frame: 12 months
Number and percentage of clinicians trained in the program and in electronic medical record
12 months
WCEDP Implementation - Clinics
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Number and percentage of weeks that clinics are held at each health center and district hospital (and the average percentage per district)
6 and 12 months
WCEDP Implementation - CHWs
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Number of days/ month that CHWs hold community awareness events or do home visits (and average percentage per district)
6 and 12 months
WCEDP Implementation - electronic medical record
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Proportion of weeks in which electronic medical record missed-visit reports are run in each district hospital
6 and 12 months
WCEDP Implementation - Phone calls
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Of patients who have missed district hospital visits, percentage with phone call documented in the electronic medical record
6 and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lydia Pace, MD, MPH, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 31, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 2, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

3
Subscribe