CT Coronary Angiography Prior to CTO PCI

May 3, 2024 updated by: Vinoda Sharma, Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust

Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography (CTCA) Prior to Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO) Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) - a Feasibility Study

A Chronic Total Occlusion or CTO of a coronary artery is a an artery that has been blocked for >/= 3 months. More than a decade ago, patients with such coronary artery blockage would have been sent for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) surgery. Newer tools and techniques have facilitated the opening (angioplasty or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)) of such occluded arteries- however success is not 100% unlike in simple coronary blockages.

Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography (CTCA) identifies the artery path and characteristics of the CTO including calcification - the latter many times is the reason for failure to cross the CTO.

The investigators aim to conduct a feasibility study to assess the effectiveness of CTCA prior to CTO PCI by randomizing suitable CTO patients to CTCA or direct CTO PCI.

20 patients will be randomized 1:1 using the sealed envelope technique and compared for:

Primary endpoint:

CTO PCI success rate in CTCA arm versus no CTCA arm

Secondary endpoints:

i. Angina by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) at 6 months (range 0-100, lower score worse, higher scores better, based on 5 characteristics - severity, frequency, treatment satisfaction and quality of life scores).

ii. Compare the number of patients who required a second CTO PCI procedure in the CTCA arm versus no CTCA arm iii. Procedural differences between the intervention CTCA arm versus no CTCA arm including: Health Economics: Cost saved per patient due to improved success and reduction in readmission or further procedure CTO PCI efficiency: Wire crossing time, Procedure time CTO PCI safety outcomes: Procedural complications (Ellis perforation, tamponade, acute kidney injury/contrast induced nephropathy, access site bleeding, donor vessel injury), Radiation: CTCA dose, CTO PCI dose, and combined CTCA and CTO PCI dose. Contrast: CTCA volume, CTO PCI volume, and combined CTCA and CTO PCI volume Change in CTO PCI strategy hierarchy as a result of the CTCA review

Patients will have a telephonic follow up at 6 months to assess angina ( by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire)

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography (CTCA) prior to Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO) Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) - a feasibility study

Summary of Trial design:

Randomised, prospective, single centre feasibility study of CTCA prior to CTO PCI

Site and Chief Investigator:

Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom Vinoda Sharma

Participant population Patients undergoing CTO PCI Planned sample size 20 Number of sites 1 Intervention duration Prior to index CTO PCI procedure Follow up duration 6 months Planned trial duration 1 year Primary objective: To determine if CTCA prior to CTO PCI results in improved procedural success rate? Secondary objectives: i) To determine if CTCA prior to CTO PCI results in improved angina as determined by Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)? ii) To determine if CTCA prior to CTO PCI reduces the need for a second procedure due to improved procedural success rate? iii) Are there procedural differences between the intervention arm (CTCA) and usual care Intervention Randomised to CTCA versus no CTCA prior to CTO PCI

ABBREVIATIONS:

AUC: Area Under the Curve

CABG: Coronary Artery Bypass Graft

CAD: Coronary Artery Disease

CTCA: Computed Tomography Coronary Angiogram

CTO: Chronic Total Occlusion

J-CTO: Japanese Chronic Total Occlusion NHS: National Health Service

PCI: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

QALYS: Quality Adjusted Life Years

QoL: Quality of Life

SAQ: Seattle Angina Questionnaire

UK: United Kingdom

Trial Protocol Synopsis Item Description

Title Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography (CTCA) prior to Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO) Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)

Introduction

Description of research question Null Hypothesis:

CTCA performed prior to CTO PCI will not improve procedural success

Existing knowledge:

A chronic total occlusion (CTO) is present in 15-20% of patients with angina who are referred for coronary angiography. Due to the complexity of occlusive coronary artery disease (CAD), including a high prevalence of calcium and tortuosity within long segments of disease, CTO PCI is associated with higher procedural complication rates. Inability to detect the intraluminal path in the CTO artery, combined with calcification and tortuosity can result in unsuccessful guidewire crossing and procedural failure.

Successful CTO PCI has been shown to improve Quality of Life (QoL) at 12 months. These patients are more likely to be angina free at 12 months as assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) (7, 8). CTO PCI in symptomatic patients is cost effective and results in greater quality-adjusted-life-years (QALYS).

CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure success rates increased from 68% to 79% between 2000 and 2011, and are as high as 90% when performed by high-volume CTO operators (2, 3). Complexity of the CTO is determined by several factors and several CTO complexity scores, derived from (invasive) angiographic lesion and clinical characteristics, have been shown to correlate with procedural success and complication rates (JCTO, PROGRESS, RECHARGE, Euro-CASTLE).

The most commonly utilized score is the J-CTO (Multicenter Chronic Total Occlusion Registry of Japan) which assigns a score of 1 each to the angiographic CTO proximal cap (tapered or blunt), calcification, tortuosity (>45degrees), lesion length (≥20mm) and previous failure, with a maximum score =5. Scores ≥2 are considered CTOs that are difficult to perform and require advanced techniques for successful revascularization.

In a proportion of these patients, the first procedure either fails completely or partially succeeds in forming a tract within the occluded artery but this is inadequate for stent delivery and the patient requires a second procedure, occasionally a third for complete success and reconstruction of the fully occluded artery.

Angiographically, the CTO artery usually shows a short proximal portion of dye filled artery prior to the occlusion. In most patients there are some collaterals from the contralateral coronary artery which try to fill part of the occluded CTO artery. However the actual body of the CTO is not visible angiographically.

Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography (CTCA) can delineate the coronary anatomy in 3-dimensions, determining atherosclerotic plaque and occlusion location, severity and morphology. This makes it an attractive modality to assess the coronary CTO. Development of a CTCA based complexity score for stratifying CTOs by difficulty resulted in the CT-RECTOR score (Computed Tomography Registry of Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization, table 1). Variables included in this score are multiple occlusions, blunt stump, severe calcification, bending, duration of CTO ≥12 months and previously failed PCI (all scored 1). The CT-RECTOR score correlates with the J-CTO score and has a better area under ROC curve (ROC AUC 0.83 for CT-RECTOR score and 0.71 for J-CTO, p < 0.001) and predicts CTO PCI success.

The role of routine CTCA pre-CTO PCI is as yet undefined as current practice involves the use of CTCA in patients who have had an unsuccessful CTO PCI attempt or previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Need for a feasibility study:

Current practice at our center involves the use of CTCA in patients who have had an unsuccessful CTO PCI attempt or previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) but the role of routine CTCA pre-CTO PCI is as yet undefined.

The small additional investment of a CTCA could help plan/improve a complex procedure and may reduce the need for additional procedures and readmissions.

The mean acute treatment cost of a CTO PCI is approximately (combined day-case -ordinary elective spell) £6933 whereas the approximate cost of a CTCA is £360 (as per local billing). Elective readmission for a failed CTO PCI procedure would entail an additional financial (to the provider) and emotional cost (to the patient).

The cost of an additional CTO PCI procedure aside, readmission and bed charges themselves can reach £1000/day (readmission =£255/day) and bed cost=£600/day). Including the cost of a second CTO PCI procedure (combined day-case -ordinary elective spell) £6933 - the overall cost can total to £10,000. In contrast, the cost of a CTCA is £360 (as per local billing).

Financial costs are one part of the issue, but a second CTO PCI procedure can also heighten patient anxiety and discomfort which are well known in patients prior to any PCI.

A feasibility study will help establish the role of a CTCA prior to CTO PCI to positively influence strategy and/or outcomes.

Methods:

Study setting: Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Trial design: This is a randomized (1:1), prospective, single center study. Patients with suitable eligibility criteria will be included and randomized to CTCA or no CTCA prior to CTO PCI and the primary and secondary outcomes compared between the two groups

Sample size: This is a feasibility study- to ensure completion within a year, the investigators have estimated 20 patients, randomized 1:1 to each arm (10 patients per arm) as a sample size in a moderate size hospital which performs approximately 100 CTO PCIs annually.

Intervention assignment: Block randomization with sealed envelope technique.

Participant/project timeline: To complete: 1 year

Data collection, management and analysis

  • eCRF (electronic Case Report Form) and online database to collect demographic, procedural and SAQ information
  • SAQ at 6 months post PCI
  • Blood samples pre and post PCI
  • Comparison of demographics, procedural details, procedural success and complications, bloods, SAQ, and financial cost between the CTCA and non-CTCA groups
  • Categorical variables will be presented as percentage and compared with the chi square or Fisher's test
  • Continuous variables will be presented as median (range) and compared with student's t-test or Mann Whitney test.
  • In addition, modelling will be performed by binary logistic regression analysis to predictors of CTO PCI success.

Monitoring: CTO PCI procedural adverse events will be reported as usual on the national database and this data will be collected in the eCRF.

Ethics: Ethical approval for this prospective study has been obtained All patients will be consented prior to inclusion in this study.

Blood: Routine blood tests will be performed immediately before the CTO PCI and after the procedure prior to discharge-this is standard of care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • West Midlands
      • Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom, B18 7QH
        • Recruiting
        • SWBH NHS Trust
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥18 years
  • CTO with J-CTO score≥2
  • Appropriate indication for CTO PCI
  • Adequate CTCA images for analysis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • <18 years of age
  • CTO with J-CTO score<2
  • Inadequate/degraded CTCA images
  • Pregnant/lactating women
  • Patients with severe contrast allergy
  • Patients unable to provide written informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CTCA prior to CTO PCI
A diagnostic CTCA will be conducted prior to CTO PCI by at a level 2 CTCA trained operator. The results will be discussed with the CTO operator prior to the CTO PCI.
CTCA performed in intervention arm patients prior to CTO PCI
No Intervention: No CTCA prior to CTO PCI
Patients will be listed directly for the CTO PCI procedure without undergoing CTCA prior

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Outcome
Time Frame: 24 hours = Day 0 of the index CTO PCI procedure
CTO PCI success rate in CTCA arm versus no CTCA arm
24 hours = Day 0 of the index CTO PCI procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
i. Angina
Time Frame: 6 months
i. Angina by the SAQ score
6 months
ii. More than one CTO PCI procedure required
Time Frame: 24 hours = Day 0 of the index CTO PCI procedure
ii. Compare the number of patients who required a second CTO PCI procedure in the CTCA arm versus no CTCA arm
24 hours = Day 0 of the index CTO PCI procedure
iii. Procedural differences between the intervention CTCA arm versus no CTCA arm-health economics
Time Frame: One year = At the end of the study
Cost saved per patient based on success and reduction in repeat procedure and readmission
One year = At the end of the study
iv. Procedural differences between the intervention CTCA arm versus no CTCA arm-CTO PCI wire crossing time
Time Frame: 24 hours = Day 0 of the index CTO PCI procedure
Time taken to cross the CTO in minutes
24 hours = Day 0 of the index CTO PCI procedure
v. Procedural differences between the intervention CTCA arm versus no CTCA arm-CTO PCI total procedure time
Time Frame: 24 hours = Day 0 of the index CTO PCI procedure
Time taken to complete the CTO PCI procedure in minutes
24 hours = Day 0 of the index CTO PCI procedure
vi. CTO PCI safety outcomes: Procedural complications (Ellis perforation, tamponade, acute kidney injury/contrast induced nephropathy, access site bleeding, donor vessel injury)
Time Frame: 24 hours = Day 0 of the index CTO PCI procedure except acute kidney injury which will be based on blood tests 48 hours after completion of the procedure
Any complication that is procedure related
24 hours = Day 0 of the index CTO PCI procedure except acute kidney injury which will be based on blood tests 48 hours after completion of the procedure
vii. CTO PCI safety outcomes: Radiation: CTCA dose, CTO PCI dose, and combined CTCA and CTO PCI dose
Time Frame: 24 hours = Day 0 of the index CTO PCI procedure
Total radiation dose at the end of the procedure and additive in the CTCA arm versus the no CTCA arm
24 hours = Day 0 of the index CTO PCI procedure
viii. CTO PCI safety outcomes: Contrast: CTCA volume, CTO PCI volume, and combined CTCA and CTO PCI volume
Time Frame: 24 hours = Day 0 of the index CTO PCI procedure
Total contrast dose in milliliters at the end of the procedure and additive in the CTCA arm versus the no CTCA arm
24 hours = Day 0 of the index CTO PCI procedure
ix. Change in CTO PCI strategy hierarchy as a result of the CTCA review : Initial procedure strategy in planning versus actual initial and final procedure strategy
Time Frame: 24 hours = Day 0 of the index CTO PCI procedure
Any change in the CTO PCI strategy due to CTCA
24 hours = Day 0 of the index CTO PCI procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 4, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 293244

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe