Impact on the Time to Diagnosis of Serious Postoperative Complications by a Controlled Connected Medical Device (SMARTANGEL)

Impact on the Time to Diagnosis of Serious Post-operative Complications of Continuous, Individualised, Alert Monitoring of SpO2, Heart Rate and Respiratory Rate by a Controlled Connected Medical Device (SMART ANGEL Intra )

Post-operative mortality in case of scheduled surgery is 3% in France (Lancet 2013) mainly due to cardiovascular or respiratory complications, by decompensation of pre-existing pathologies.

Complications due to the medical practice are the third cause of morbidity (BMJ, 2016). More than half are preventable and are mainly observed in surgical patients. In conventional hospitalization, excluding intensive care, monitoring is done discontinuously for most of the patients, which does not allow early diagnosis of a vital cardiovascular or respiratory failure.

Diagnosis and late treatment do not allow good recovery. The early identification of a vital failure by the continuous monitoring of three simple physiological parameters (SpO2, heart rate and respiratory rate) would allow faster management by the hospital staff and a reduction in immediate and possibly delayed postoperative mortality.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The challenge of this research is to transpose in an ordinary hospitalization unit the continuous monitoring of vital functions carried out in intensive care by the continuous measurement of simple parameters using the "SMART ANGEL Intra-hospital" System's (connected medical devices and alerts).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

2000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Jean-Louis MARTY, MD,PHD
  • Phone Number: +33 01 49 81 43 45
  • Email: jean.marty@aphp.fr

Study Locations

      • Créteil, France, 94010
        • Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris - CHU HENRI MONDOR
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Patients receiving a scheduled non-ambulatory surgical or interventional procedure
  • Affiliation to a social security scheme, beneficiary or entitled person (excluding AME)
  • Patient's written consent or of the trusted person in case of physical incapacity

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inclusion in emergency situations
  • ASA1 patient (without associated pathology)
  • Patient with a multi-drug resistant germ in isolation
  • Known linguistic inability of the patient to understand the study
  • Known pregnancy or breastfeeding woman
  • Patients with implantable pacemakers, implantable defibrillators or neurostimulators.
  • Person under legal protection or unable to give consent
  • Person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active alerts
"SMART ANGEL Intra-hospital" System with active alerts
Nurse intervention according to the alert level + traditional monitoring
Active Comparator: Inactive alerts
"SMART ANGEL Intra-hospital" System with inactive alerts
No alert + traditional monitoring + alert in case of imminent life threat

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in response times for nurses
Time Frame: between inclusion visit and day 30
Difference in response times between the two groups as measured by the difference between the exact time of occurrence of the complication and the time of caregiver intervention.
between inclusion visit and day 30

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality during hospitalisation
Time Frame: between inclusion visit and day 30
Within 30 days of the intervention
between inclusion visit and day 30
Mortality within 30 days of surgery
Time Frame: between inclusion visit and day 30
between inclusion visit and day 30
Percentage of transfers to intensive care unit
Time Frame: between inclusion visit and day 30
between inclusion visit and day 30
Length of stay
Time Frame: between inclusion visit and day 30
between inclusion visit and day 30
ICU length of stay
Time Frame: between inclusion visit and day 30
between inclusion visit and day 30
Rate of calls to the doctor on duty
Time Frame: between inclusion visit and day 30
between inclusion visit and day 30
Percentage of re-hospitalization within 30 days
Time Frame: between inclusion visit and day 30
between inclusion visit and day 30
Percentage of hospitalisations in follow-up care and rehabilitation care units
Time Frame: between inclusion visit and day 30
between inclusion visit and day 30
Percentage of patients managed at home
Time Frame: between inclusion visit and day 30
between inclusion visit and day 30
False positive rate
Time Frame: between inclusion visit and day 30
Alert without complication for the patient
between inclusion visit and day 30
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio
Time Frame: between inclusion visit and day 30
between inclusion visit and day 30
Patient acceptability
Time Frame: between inclusion visit and day 30
Quantitative and qualitative assessment of the device's usability by the patient via Questionnaire and interview
between inclusion visit and day 30
Acceptability of care teams
Time Frame: between inclusion visit and day 30
Questionnaire and interview
between inclusion visit and day 30

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jean-Louis MARTY, MD,PHD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

June 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • APHP210932
  • N° IDRCB (Other Identifier: 2025-A01594-45)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe