- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05400031
Oral Care With Propolis in Pediatric Oncology Patients
Does Oral Care With Propolis Affect the Development of Oral Mucositis in Pediatric Oncology Patients: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
İzmir, Turkey, 35640
- Tepecik Research and Training Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Volunteering to participate in the study
- Receiving chemotherapy treatment for lymphoproliferative malignant disease (leukaemia, lymphoma) or other childhood solid tumour (such as central nervous system tumour, neuroblastoma, osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, hepatoblastoma, germ cell tumours)
- Being between the ages of 2-18 (Although there is no harm in using propolis, it is inconvenient for children under the age of 2 to use honey and its by-products due to botulism)
- No development of oral mucositis
- The child who does not smoke
Exclusion Criteria:
- The patient does not receive head and neck RT (increases the incidence of oral mucositis by 40%).
- The patient is allergic to bee products.
- Exclusion Criteria and Practices in this Case:
- Development of an allergic reaction to propolis (Applied oral care protocol is stopped, removed from the sample)
- Starting RT
- The child's need for MV support
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control
In this group, the researcher will provide the participants with routine care.
|
|
|
Placebo Comparator: placebo group
In this group, the researcher will provide the participants with a propolis vehicle
|
Placebo
|
|
Active Comparator: propolis group
In this group, the researcher will provide the participants with a propolis solution.
|
After obtaining written consent, oral identification of all participants will be performed prior to randomization. Oral diagnosis of children receiving chemotherapy will be repeated on day 0, day 5, and day 10, and the difference between the Oral Mucositis Rating Scale mean scores of the children in the groups will be examined. Oral Mucositis Assessment: Oral Mucositis Rating Scale will be used. The oral mucosa of children will be evaluated using the World Health Organization Oral Mucositis Classification. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Oral mucositis grading
Time Frame: first day of the intervention
|
Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale is a classification method accepted by the World Health Organization and used all over the world.
It has standard clauses that will be interpreted in the same way by all people.
However, in order to ignore the differences in interpretation, multi-research evaluation will be used in the first 20 observations and the consistency between the observers will be analyzed with Kappa analysis and the follow-ups will continue.
|
first day of the intervention
|
|
Oral mucositis grading
Time Frame: fifth day of the intervention
|
Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale is a classification method accepted by the World Health Organization and used all over the world.
It has standard clauses that will be interpreted in the same way by all people.
However, in order to ignore the differences in interpretation, multi-research evaluation will be used in the first 20 observations and the consistency between the observers will be analyzed with Kappa analysis and the follow-ups will continue.
|
fifth day of the intervention
|
|
Oral mucositis grading
Time Frame: tenth day of the intervention
|
Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale is a classification method accepted by the World Health Organization and used all over the world.
It has standard clauses that will be interpreted in the same way by all people.
However, in order to ignore the differences in interpretation, multi-research evaluation will be used in the first 20 observations and the consistency between the observers will be analyzed with Kappa analysis and the follow-ups will continue.
|
tenth day of the intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Chair: ZUHAL ONER SIVIS, MD, Tepecik Research and Training Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2022/61
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.