Real-time Tele-monitoring Versus Routine Monitoring of Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Systemic Therapy

June 1, 2022 updated by: Ain Shams University

Real-time Tele-monitoring Versus Routine Monitoring of Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Systemic Therapy.

Patients with breast cancer receiving systemic therapy have a variety of symptoms.

In cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and targeted therapy, it is common to report symptoms to physicians before each cycle of systemic therapy and planning maintenance and treatment applications accordingly. Nowadays tele-monitoring of patient reported outcomes using mobile applications is used widely.

These applications provide many advantages to the patient, physicians, and health care system because patients report the symptoms experienced and helps contribute to the quick management of the symptoms and improve the adherence to treatment, decrease the frequency of dose delays and dose reduction of their treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

In Egypt, breast cancer is the most frequent malignancy among Egyptian women, accounting for 38.8% of cancers in this population, with the expected number of breast cancer cases nearly 22, 700 in 2020 and forecasted to be approximately 46, 000 in 2050.It is found that the breast cancer mortality rate is around 11%, being the second cause of cancer-related mortality after hepatocellular carcinoma.

Systemic therapy including chemotherapy and antiHER2 drugs are frequently utilized in the adjuvant setting in the treatment of breast cancer as Anthracycline-based chemotherapy (AC, FEC, FAC Protocols containing Doxorubicin, Epirubicin, fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide), which may lead to cardiac side effects, taxanes (Paclitaxel and Docetaxel) which may lead to GIT Problems and peripheral neuropathy. The addition of trastuzumab to a sequential anthracycline/cyclophosphamide-taxane regimen was linked to a 3% risk of cardiac toxicity, whereas trastuzumab in conjunction with non-anthracycline regimens (e.g. carboplatin/docetaxel) was linked to lower rates of cardiac toxicity.

These drugs may result in a variety of symptoms to develop, it is critical to measure, prevent and control them. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are becoming more popular as a way to quantify symptoms and health-related quality of life in cancer care. PROs are useful to capture the patient's perspective on their care and treatment, and they are intended to supplement traditional clinical outcomes and toxicity reported by physicians such as survival and toxicity assessment.

Tele-monitoring is crucial in patients' follow-up as it will improve patients' adherence to treatment, decrease the frequency in dose reduction and dose delay. This will be accomplished by using tele-monitoring in reporting and managing patient reported outcomes from chemotherapy using PRO- CTCAE Checklist, version 1 to assess the grade and severity of symptoms reported by patients throughout the course of adjuvant chemotherapy with early management compared to the routine monitoring done in the regular clinic visits. In order to avoid the complications, symptoms should be diagnosed early and symptom referral for management should be advised and offered with evidence-based approaches. For this purpose, symptom reporting has recently been using mobile applications.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 63 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Stage I-III breast cancer under adjuvant intravenous chemotherapy with or without targeted therapy.
  2. Able to provide a written informed consent .
  3. Must have an internet access.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of other malignancies whether in the past or simultaneously.
  2. Male cancer patients.
  3. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Routine monitoring
patients with breast cancer who will receive adjuvant treatment and will be followed up during treatment with routine visits.
Active Comparator: Tele-monitoring through mobile application
Patients with breast cancer who will receive adjuvant therapy and will be followed up during treatment through tele-monitoring with mobile application and CTCAE checklist for PRO.
Tele-monitoring of Patient reported outcomes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of frequency and severity of symptoms using real-time tele-monitoring versus routine symptom monitoring.
Time Frame: 2 years
To compare between grade of side effects of treatment between both arms through CTCAE checklist for patient reported outcomes.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
● Comparison of adherence to treatment between both groups.
Time Frame: 3 years
to compare the tolerability for treatment between both arms through assessment of the percentage of dose delay in both groups.
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

June 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 261\2021

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer Female

Clinical Trials on Tele-monitoring through mobile application

3
Subscribe