Violence Against Health Care Workers in Fragile Settings (VIA-H)

Violence Against Health Care Workers: Understanding Context Through Citizen Science and Measuring a De-escalation Training Intervention Effectiveness in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo and Iraq

The general objective of the project is to assess whether a violence de-escalating training for health professionals and of a publicly displayed Code of Conduct (a set of rules developed through a citizen science and co-design approach) for both health professionals and clients at the level of the health facility, can reduce the incidence and severity of episodes of violence, and to identify the most cost-effective way to implement these interventions in rural Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and in the mega city of Baghdad, Iraq.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study will adopt a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized intervention trial (SW-CRT) design to assess the two intervention components, a violence de-escalating training and the implementation of the code of conduct co-developed during the formative qualitative phase. The study will adopt a closed cohort with repeated measurements on the same participants (nurses in DRC and junior doctors in Baghdad) and will involve the unidirectional transition of each enrolled cluster (health facilities in DRC and secondary hospitals in Baghdad) from the control (no intervention) to the intervention sequence in a randomized sequential manner according to a predefined roll out process.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

798

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HCWs from selected participating health facilities in DRC, junior doctors during their first year resident and permanent health care staff from participating secondary hospitals in Iraq
  • HCWs and junior medical doctors and permanent health care staff must have been employed/ or worked as HCW/ medical doctors or as permanent health care staff for at least 6 months
  • All above participants must have completed the written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years; cognitive impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1 De-escalating violence training
The de-escalating violence training intervention will be introduced after a pre-interventional period of 3 months. A refreshment training will be introduced at month 11.
  • Individual educational component through a de-escalating violence training for health care workers (verbal and non-verbal de-escalating techniques)
  • Refreshment training in the form of collaborative learning
Experimental: Arm 2 De-escalating violence training
The de-escalating violence training intervention will be introduced before the second observation period at month 11. A refreshment training will be introduced at month 18.
  • Individual educational component through a de-escalating violence training for health care workers (verbal and non-verbal de-escalating techniques)
  • Refreshment training in the form of collaborative learning
Experimental: Arm 3 De-escalating violence training
The de-escalating violence training intervention will be introduced before the third observation period at month 18.
  • Individual educational component through a de-escalating violence training for health care workers (verbal and non-verbal de-escalating techniques)
  • Refreshment training in the form of collaborative learning
Experimental: Arm 4 De-escalating violence training + Code of conduct
The de-escalating violence training intervention will be introduced after a pre-interventional period of 3 months. The code of conduct via a warning board will be introduced at month 11. A refreshment training will be introduced at month 18.
  • Individual educational component through a de-escalating violence training for health care workers (verbal and non-verbal de-escalating techniques)
  • Refreshment training in the form of collaborative learning
A publicly displayed code of conduct (a co-designed set of rules) for both HCWs and clients, delivered via a warning board at the level of the health facilities and secondary hospitals
Experimental: Arm 5 De-escalating violence training + Code of conduct
The de-escalating violence training intervention and the code of conduct via a warning board will be simultaneously introduced at month 11. A refreshment training will be introduced at month 18.
  • Individual educational component through a de-escalating violence training for health care workers (verbal and non-verbal de-escalating techniques)
  • Refreshment training in the form of collaborative learning
A publicly displayed code of conduct (a co-designed set of rules) for both HCWs and clients, delivered via a warning board at the level of the health facilities and secondary hospitals
Experimental: Arm 6 Code of conduct + De-escalating violence training
The code of conduct via a warning board will be introduced at month 11. The de-escalating violence training intervention will be introduced at month 18.
  • Individual educational component through a de-escalating violence training for health care workers (verbal and non-verbal de-escalating techniques)
  • Refreshment training in the form of collaborative learning
A publicly displayed code of conduct (a co-designed set of rules) for both HCWs and clients, delivered via a warning board at the level of the health facilities and secondary hospitals
Experimental: Arm 7 De-escalating violence training + Code of conduct
The de-escalating violence training intervention is introduced after a pre-interventional period of 3 months. The code of conduct via a warning board and a refreshment training will be simultaneously introduced at month 18.
  • Individual educational component through a de-escalating violence training for health care workers (verbal and non-verbal de-escalating techniques)
  • Refreshment training in the form of collaborative learning
A publicly displayed code of conduct (a co-designed set of rules) for both HCWs and clients, delivered via a warning board at the level of the health facilities and secondary hospitals
Experimental: Arm 8 De-escalating violence training + Code of conduct
The de-escalating violence training intervention will be introduced before the second observation period at month 11. The code of conduct via a warning board and a refreshment training will be simultaneously introduced at month 18.
  • Individual educational component through a de-escalating violence training for health care workers (verbal and non-verbal de-escalating techniques)
  • Refreshment training in the form of collaborative learning
A publicly displayed code of conduct (a co-designed set of rules) for both HCWs and clients, delivered via a warning board at the level of the health facilities and secondary hospitals
Experimental: Arm 9 De-escalating violence training + Code of conduct
The code of conduct via a warning board and the violence de-escalating training will be simultaneously introduced at month 18.
  • Individual educational component through a de-escalating violence training for health care workers (verbal and non-verbal de-escalating techniques)
  • Refreshment training in the form of collaborative learning
A publicly displayed code of conduct (a co-designed set of rules) for both HCWs and clients, delivered via a warning board at the level of the health facilities and secondary hospitals
Experimental: Arm 10 Code of conduct
The code of conduct via a warning board will be introduced at month 11.
A publicly displayed code of conduct (a co-designed set of rules) for both HCWs and clients, delivered via a warning board at the level of the health facilities and secondary hospitals
Experimental: Arm 11 Code of conduct
The code of conduct via a warning board will be introduced at month 18.
A publicly displayed code of conduct (a co-designed set of rules) for both HCWs and clients, delivered via a warning board at the level of the health facilities and secondary hospitals

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence and severity of self-reported non-physical aggression
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of self-reported non-physical aggression (verbal abuse, threats, ironic language, provocative or aggressive body language etc.) during the fulfillment of a professional activity in the last 6 months
6 months
Incidence and severity of self-reported physical aggression
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of self-reported physical aggression during the fulfillment of a professional activity in the last 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Level of confidence in coping with patient aggression
Time Frame: 0, 6, 12, 18 months
Instrument "Clinicians confidence in coping with patient aggression (CCPAI) (Thackreys, 1987)"
0, 6, 12, 18 months
Level of post-traumatic stress disorders (PTSD) among HCWs
Time Frame: 0, 6, 12, 18 months
Instrument "Post-traumatic stress disorder PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)) (Weathers, F.W. et al. 2013)"
0, 6, 12, 18 months
Level of burnout among HCWs
Time Frame: 0, 6, 12, 18 months
Instrument "Level of burnout" (Malach 2005), burnout measure short version (BMS). The ten-item version of the BMS are evaluated on 7-point frequency scales, with a score of 4 or above indicating burnout.
0, 6, 12, 18 months
Psychological empathy among HCWs
Time Frame: 0, 6, 12, 18 months
Instrument "Jefferson scale of physician empathy (Hojat M et al. 2007)"
0, 6, 12, 18 months
Absenteeism
Time Frame: 0, 6, 12, 18 months
Number of sick leave spells taken by the HCWs during the study period
0, 6, 12, 18 months
Intent to leave among HCWs
Time Frame: 0, 6, 12, 18 months
The shortened, six-item version of the turnover intention scale (TIS-6) (Bothma & Roodt 2013), will be used to assess turnover intentions and as well as to predict actual turnover among HCWs. The TIS-6 scale is scored on a five-point Likert-type scale with scores ranging from 1 (never) to 5 ( always). A high score indicates stronger turnover intention.
0, 6, 12, 18 months
Economic cost of the intervention
Time Frame: 18 months
Two types of costs will be considered: 1) direct costs of the intervention (e.g training costs, space or rent costs, costs to develop the code of conduct) and 2) direct costs due to health system disruption (e.g. health care services foregone or postponed, material etc.), cost incurred by the HCWs as a consequence of violent episodes including direct medical costs (e.g. hospital stay cost, consultation costs, laboratory costs), non-medical costs (e.g. transportation, meals etc.), and indirect costs (e.g. absenteeism, presenteeism).
18 months
Productivity loss (presenteeism)
Time Frame: 18 months
Work Limitation questionnaire (WLQ) (Lerner D. et al. 2002). The WLQ consists of eight items investigating four domains (time management, physical tasks, mental-interpersonal tasks, and output tasks), which are calculated into scores ranging from 0 (no limitations) to 100 (highest limitations).
18 months
Health care workers health-related quality of life
Time Frame: 0, 6, 12, 18 months
European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EuroQol EQ-5D-5L) (Devlin NJ et al. 2017). The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is self-assessed and it measures health outcomes on five dimensions (mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain/discomfort, and depression/anxiety) with five levels ranging from none to major complaints. Scores range from 0 (death) to 1 (full health).
0, 6, 12, 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sonja Merten, MD MPH PhD, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Workplace Violence

Clinical Trials on Training in de-escalating violence

3
Subscribe