Coping, Perceived Meaning, Joy, Horizontal Civility at Work

October 21, 2022 updated by: Methodist Health System
The aim of this study is to assess and describe employee characteristics associated with perceived horizontal inter-collegial workplace uncivil behavior within nursing services, and identify any relationships with meaning and joy in work (MJW), and assess job satisfaction.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Workplace incivility in the nursing profession interferes with the establishment of a culture of safety, places patient safety at risk, and erodes job satisfaction and a positive staff environment (Kile, Eaton, deValpine, & Gilbert, 2019). Contemporary research among nurses in Magnet and Pathway to Excellence-designated hospitals reflects that 'nurse coworker incivility is sporadic on average but varies considerably across nurses (Smith, Morin, & Lake, 2018). However, there needs to be more administrative focus and attention on nurses' work environments to support civil workplaces where the nurses focuses on and provide patient care (Smith et al., 2018). Hence, the proposed study aims to examine intra-organizational incivility, that is incivility 'originating from within the organization' (Cortina, Magley, Williams, & Langhout, 2001), and will examine nurses' intrapersonal resourcefulness to support or promote proactive self-management in a self-efficacious manner, thus ameliorating workplace incivility, dissatisfaction, and detrimental outcomes. For this study, nursing staff will include registered nurses and other para-professionals employed under nursing services. The para-professionals employed under nursing services are Mental Health Technicians (MHT), Patient Care Technicians (PCT), Surgical Technicians (ST), and Emergency Medical Services (EMS).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

105

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75201
        • Recruiting
        • Methodist Dallas Medical Center
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75203
        • Recruiting
        • Methodist Mansfield Medical Center
        • Contact:
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75237
      • Midlothian, Texas, United States, 76065
        • Recruiting
        • Methodist Midlothian Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

A power analysis using the G*Power 3.1 [1] indicated that a total sample of 84 people would be needed to detect a medium effect (Cohen's ρ= 0.30) with 80% power using exact correlation-difference from constant (one sample case) with alpha at 0.05. We plan to enroll 105 people to account for the 20% attrition rate (Faul, Erdfelder, Buchner, & Lang, 2009). Participants will be asked to respond online to a questionnaire launched via Survey Monkey® and provide demographic information and information related to coping, perceived meaning, joy, and horizontal civility at work.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The sample of participants will include all willing individuals who are registered nurses (full time, part time, and per-diem) or nursing para-professionals employed by MHS and working at the MDMC, MCMC, MLMC, or MMMC campuses.
  • Provide direct patient care for more than 50% of work hours.
  • All participants must be able to read and understand English.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Excluded from the study will be employees who do not provide direct patient care for at least 50% of the time, educators, managers, leaders, advanced practice nurses, and non-nursing service personnel.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-efficacy
Time Frame: Dec 2021 - Dec 2022
Self-efficacy is directly related to job satisfaction
Dec 2021 - Dec 2022
Perceived self-efficacy
Time Frame: Dec 2021 - Dec 2022
Perceived self-efficacy is inversely related to incivility
Dec 2021 - Dec 2022
MJW
Time Frame: Dec 2021 - Dec 2022
MJW is inversely related to perceived incivility [Rutledge et al, 2018]
Dec 2021 - Dec 2022
Nursing staff in high-stress levels clinical areas and high sense of urgency (e.g., critical care and the emergency department (ED))
Time Frame: Dec 2021 - Dec 2022
Nursing staff in high-stress levels clinical areas and high sense of urgency (e.g., critical care and the emergency department (ED)) are more likely to be exposed to incivility
Dec 2021 - Dec 2022
Years of experience in this hospital predicts staff's perception of incivility
Time Frame: Dec 2021 - Dec 2022
Years of experience in this hospital predicts staff's perception of incivility
Dec 2021 - Dec 2022
Years of experience in nursing services at any facility predicts report of coping self-efficacy
Time Frame: Dec 2021 - Dec 2022
Years of experience in nursing services at any facility predicts report of coping self-efficacy
Dec 2021 - Dec 2022

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anne-Gret Friedrich-Cuntz, EdD, Methodist Charlton Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Cheyenne Ruby, MSN, Methodist Dallas Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Laura Sweatt, MSN, Methodist Mansfield Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Julie Vinson, BSN, Methodist Midlothian Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 069.NUR.2021.A

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Self Efficacy

3
Subscribe