New Treatments for Actinic Keratoses of the Scalp

November 19, 2023 updated by: Kirsi Isoherranen, Helsinki University Central Hospital
This blinded controlled 2-year study on 120 patients with 2 or more actinic keratoses, compare the efficacy and tolerability of pulsed dye-laser- mediated photodynamic therapy compared to conventional photodynamic therapy and fractional-laser assisted daylight photodynamic therapy compared to daylight photodynamic therapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Actinic keratoses are premalign skin lesions with increasing prevalence, causing a rising burden on the health care system. In this blinded controlled study we assess the efficacy of pulsed dye-laser- mediated photodynamic therapy compared to conventional photodynamic therapy and fractional-laser assisted daylight photodynamic therapy to daylight photodynamic therapy. It is a prospective, randomized and blinded split-head comparative study during the years 2016- 2024. 120 patients are recruited based on referral or from patients attending the clinic, with 2 or more actinic keratoses on the head, 60 to the pulsed dye-laser study and 60 to the fractional laser study. Follow-up appointments are 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post treatment. Patient reported maximal pain during treatment is documented.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • at least 2 AKs located on both sides of the head (either the scalp, forehead, temples, or cheeks)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pigmented AKs, in situ-carcinomas, skin cancers, psoriasis or eczema on the treatment area

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pulsed dye laser-mediated photodynamic therapy
After curretage light-sensitizer (methyl aminolaevulinate cream) was applied on the lesions and covered with an occlusive plastic foil for 2-3-h incubation. Then a local lidocaine anaesthetic spray was applied. The lesions were illuminated with 30% overlapping pulsed laser double-stacked pulses (, energy 7 J/cm2, spot size 7 mm, pulse duration 10 ms, wavelength 595 nm and dynamic cooling 2/3).
Comparance of pulsed-dye laser-mediated and conventional photodynamic therapy in a split-head design
Metvix-cream was used for photodynamic therapy in all experimental arms
Active Comparator: Conventional photodynamic therapy
After curretage a light-sensitizer (methyl aminolaevulinate cream) was applied on the lesions and covered with an occlusive plastic foil for 2-3-h incubation. Then a local lidocaine anaesthetic spray was applied. The lesions were illuminated with a red LED light for 7-8 min (exposure 75 J/cm2, wavelength 630 nm).
Metvix-cream was used for photodynamic therapy in all experimental arms
Experimental: Ablative fractional laser- mediated daylight photodynamic therapy
After curretage lidocaine anaesthetic spray was applied on the whole treatment area. Lesions were treated with an ablative fractional CO2-laser (19 W, Dot mode, spacing 1000 µm, stack 3, scanning dwell time 1800 µs, repeat 0.5 s). A thin layer of light sensitizer (methyl aminolaevulinate cream) was applied on the treatment area. The patients were asked to move outdoors (temperature >10C, no rain, June-August) or to our adPDT-room (IndoorLux®, wavelength 350-750 nm, 15-25 000 lux) within 30 minutes, for the 2h-illumination.
Metvix-cream was used for photodynamic therapy in all experimental arms
Comparance of fractional CO2-laser-mediated or plain daylight photodynamic therapy in a split-head design
Active Comparator: Daylight photodynamic therapy
After curretage lidocaine anaesthetic spray was applied on the whole treatment area. A thin layer of light sensitizer (methyl aminolaevulinate cream) was applied on the treatment area. The patients were asked to move outdoors (temperature >10C, no rain, June-August) or to our adPDT-room (IndoorLux®, wavelength 350-750 nm, 15-25 000 lux) within 30 minutes, for the 2h-illumination.
Metvix-cream was used for photodynamic therapy in all experimental arms

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient complete (%, P) or partial clearance (%, P)
Time Frame: 2 year
All actinic keratoses on the particular treatment area cleared, or 75% of lesions on treatment area cleared
2 year
Lesion-specific clearance (%, P)
Time Frame: 2 year
Proportion of lesions that completely healed, partially healed or not healed in the particular treatment
2 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient reported pain
Time Frame: 1 day
Maximal pain during treatment on the Numerical Rating Scale (0-10)
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 24, 2016

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 13, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Actinic Keratoses

Clinical Trials on Pulsed-dye laser

3
Subscribe