The Effect of Straining Techniques on Women and Newborn

October 11, 2022 updated by: Ozlem Akgün, Cumhuriyet University

The Effect of Straining Techniques on Duration of Labor, Perineal Trauma Status, and Newborn Apgar Score

Purpose: To examine the effects of straining techniques on the duration of labor, perineal trauma status and newborn apgar score.

Method: This study is a randomized controlled trial. The straining techniques were explained to the pregnant women who gave written consent to participate in the study and were randomly assigned to groups in the latent phase (natural, spontaneous, Valsalva), and the techniques were applied in the second phase of labor.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Purpose: The present study was planned to determine the effects of straining techniques on the duration of labor, perineal trauma status, and newborn Apgar score.

Method: The study, which had a randomized-controlled experimental design, was conducted in Sivas Numune Hospital Birth Unit. The sampling size was calculated using power analysis. In the literature, spontaneous straining is used by pregnant women in the range of 25-81%, and Valsalva -type straining has a rate of 32-75%. To represent the population of the study, sample volume was determined at =0.05 significance level, 1- =0.95 Confidence Interval, =0.20 error risk, and 1- =0.80 power, and the total number of individuals was determined as 354. The data of the study were collected with the "Pre-Evaluation Form", "Personal Information Form", "Labor Evaluation Form", and "Apgar Score" created by the researchers in line with the literature data. The straining techniques were explained to the pregnant women who gave written consent to participate in the study and were randomly assigned to groups in the latent phase (natural, spontaneous, Valsalva), and the techniques were applied in the second phase of labor. ANOVA, Kruskal Wallis H-test, Chi-square test, Exact test, Tamhane T2 test, and Dunn Test were used to evaluate the data obtained in the study. Statistical significance was evaluated at a 0.05 significance level and the SPSS version 23.0 was used.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

354

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Sivas, Turkey
        • Sivas sample hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years to 39 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 38-42. being at the gestational week,
  • Having a singleton pregnancy
  • Fetus in vertex position
  • Being in the latent phase in the first stage of labor
  • Planning and having a normal vaginal birth,
  • Not having a diagnosed chronic physical disease,
  • Not having a diagnosed psychiatric disease,
  • No risk of risky pregnancy or fetal anomaly,
  • Being literate,
  • No communication problem
  • Giving birth in the lithotomy position
  • Volunteering to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 38-42. not in the week of pregnancy,
  • Having multiple pregnancy
  • Fetus out of vertex position
  • Being in the latent phase in the first stage of birth,
  • Having a cesarean section while planning a normal vaginal delivery,
  • Having a diagnosed chronic physical illness,
  • Having a diagnosed psychiatric illness,
  • Having a risky pregnancy or fetal anomaly risk,
  • illiteracy,
  • Having a communication problem
  • Giving birth in different positions
  • Not willing to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Valsalva Straining (Control Group)
The straining techniques for the groups were explained by the researcher in line with the process steps in the latent phase. Valsalva straining is supported in 2nd stage of labor. Duration of delivery, perineal trauma status and Apgar Scores were evaluated.
Valsalva, spontaneous and natural strainings are supported in 2nd stage of labor. Duration of delivery, perineal trauma status and Apgar Scores were evaluated.
Experimental: Spontaneous Straining
The straining techniques for the groups were explained by the researcher in line with the process steps in the latent phase. Spontaneous straining is supported in 2nd stage of labor. Duration of delivery, perineal trauma status and Apgar Scores were evaluated.
Valsalva, spontaneous and natural strainings are supported in 2nd stage of labor. Duration of delivery, perineal trauma status and Apgar Scores were evaluated.
Experimental: Natural Straining
The straining techniques for the groups were explained by the researcher in line with the process steps in the latent phase. Duration of delivery, perineal trauma status and Apgar Scores were evaluated.
Valsalva, spontaneous and natural strainings are supported in 2nd stage of labor. Duration of delivery, perineal trauma status and Apgar Scores were evaluated.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The distribution of the duration of the second phase according to the straining styles of women in labor
Time Frame: 2-90 minute
The distribution of the duration of the second phase was evaluated according to the pushing styles of the women who gave birth. The duration of the second stage of labor was calculated by keeping the hours and minutes according to the type of straining used. The time from the woman's full dilation (10 cm) to the birth of the baby was measured.
2-90 minute
The perineal trauma status according to the straining styles of women during labor
Time Frame: 10-30 minute
Perineal trauma status of women was evaluated according to their pushing styles during delivery. Episiotomy or laceration status after delivery of the placenta was evaluated by observation and examination method.
10-30 minute
The distribution of the mean Apgar Scores of the newborns according to the straining types of women during labor
Time Frame: 1-5 minute
The newborn apgar scores were evaluated according to the straining types of the women at the time of delivery. Apgar Score is the expression of the physiological condition of the infant at a certain time (ACOG, 2015). In studies examining the relationship between mortality rates and Apgar scores, it was shown that infants with low scores (0-2) had higher mortality rates (14%). Infants with high scores (7-10) had lower mortality rates (0.13%). The scoring system showed that overall Apgar scores of infants born with cesarean section were lower than those born vaginally (Apgar, 1966; Rubarth, 2012). Apgar developed this evaluation tool with 5 objective criteria (heart rate, respiration, reflex irritability, muscle tonus, and color). The Apgar Evaluation System is used in the 1st and 5th minutes after the infant is born. Apgar scores of 7-10 are reassuring, normal, 4-6 moderately abnormal, and 0-3 are considered low in term and preterm infants (ACOG, 2015).
1-5 minute

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The distribution of women's satisfaction and considerations about the practice according to the way they strain during labor
Time Frame: 30 minute- 4 hours
According to the types of straining during childbirth, women's satisfaction and thoughts about the application were evaluated. The satisfaction of women with the pushing techniques was evaluated with the questions asked in the questionnaire. Each woman was asked whether she would like to use the type of pushing she used in her next birth.
30 minute- 4 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gulbahtiyar Demirel, Cumhuriyet University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 24, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 13, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OAkgun

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Newborn; Vitality

Clinical Trials on Straining types

3
Subscribe