Effect of Core Training on Physical Fitness and Smash Performance Among Female Badminton Players in Guangxi, China

January 18, 2024 updated by: Ma Shuzhen
The performance of Chinese women's badminton singles players is declining to a large extent, the training of badminton in China needs to catch up, and the talent ladder has caused a fault. Badminton Routine training, the effect is not apparent . An essay on the impact of core training on athletes' skill performance was written by Luo; it proves that core strength training plays a positive role in a variety of sports; there is no study of female badminton players. Coaches or sports researchers can use this knowledge to manage the training load of badminton players better, thereby helping badminton players achieve better results in badminton training and competition.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Hibbs constructed the Model of Core Training and Potential Performance according to the theoretical framework of core strength training. This study intervention design part of the researchers referred to Greg Glassman's "CrossFit training guide" and theoretical framework of core strength training. Motion design source form Motion design source "Diversified Training to Enhance Core Strength State General Administration of sport (Sport.gov.cn)"and Khatoon wrote the article. The duration and frequency of intervention came from the review. It is found in reviewing the effect of core strength training on badminton players' performance is 8 weeks and 3 times. Therefore, this study adopted intervention for 8 weeks, 3 times a week. The subjects of this study are 18-22 years old female college elite badminton players, all of whom are national second-level and above athletes. This study employs a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (CRCT) design. The athletes were randomly assigned to two training sites and divided into experimental and control groups. The two groups had the same professional skills training content. The only difference was the physical training part. The training program of the two groups lasts 8 weeks, 3 times per week, and 1 hour per training. The experimental group performed core training, while the control group maintained routine training. In addition, the specific content of the routine training of the control group was the standard training plan of the school. The dependent variables measured in this study are physical fitness (strength, speed, endurance, agility, and flexibility) and killing the ball under different states, including in sit Smash, jump smash, move left smash, move right smash, and back smash.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Guangxi, China, 43400
        • Ma Shuzhen
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged 18-22 years.
  2. Chinese university female badminton players.
  3. No sports injuries, such as ankle injuries or waist injuries.
  4. Elite athlete

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Athletes who were systematically training their core strength.
  2. Athletes with sports injuries such as ankle or waist injuries.
  3. Who could not follow the entire training schedule for three months.
  4. Students who work out regularly or have hobbies for extra physical exercise.
  5. Students with physical or mental illness.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
The control group will follow the curriculum standards set by the Sports University.
Experimental: Experimental group
The experimental group will undergo 60 minutes of Core Training.
The experimental group received 12 weeks of core training, and the control group received 12 weeks of conventional training, 3 times/times Of the week. Each session lasts 60 minutes and includes warm-up, exercise, and relaxation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effects of strength among college students
Time Frame: Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Measure the distance of the standing long jump with a measuring tape in centimeters (cm).
Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Effects of endurance among college students
Time Frame: Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Recorded the number of jumping ropes in 1 min.
Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Effects of Speed among college students
Time Frame: Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Use a stopwatch to record the time taken by the athlete to run 20 times with a low center of gravity (measured in seconds)
Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Effects of agility among college students
Time Frame: Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
The course measured 10 meters in length and 5 meters in width when it was set up on a basketball court. The start, finish line, and both turning points were indicated by four cones. Four more cones were positioned at equal intervals down the center. The distance between the central cones was 3.3 meters. To cross the finish line, the subjects were told to run as fast as they could around the course in the designated direction. Time spent recording (seconds)
Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Effects of flexibility among college students
Time Frame: Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Use the sit-and-reach box. The score is recorded as the point where their fingertips reach the measurement scale. The range of motion is measured in cm.
Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Effects of In sit Smash among college students
Time Frame: Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Accuracy and velocity test
Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Effects of Jump smash among college students
Time Frame: Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
The athlete's task was to perform such a shot that the shuttlecock flew between the net and the colored string, giving the shuttlecock the highest possible velocity, Badminton subjects use their own rackets (according to the player's personal preferences) to spike the ball, test 10 balls, and record the number successful of 10 balls(times), and use a SMART BDMINTON SENSOR to record the speed of each ball(km/h). The test process is as follows in sit smash, jump smash, move left smash, move right smash, back smash.
Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Effects of move left smash among college students
Time Frame: Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
The athlete's task was to perform such a shot that the shuttlecock flew between the net and the colored string, giving the shuttlecock the highest possible velocity, Badminton subjects use their own rackets (according to the player's personal preferences) to spike the ball, test 10 balls, and record the number successful of 10 balls(times), and use a SMART BDMINTON SENSOR to record the speed of each ball(km/h). The test process is as follows in sit smash, jump smash, move left smash, move right smash, back smash.
Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Effects of move right smash among college students
Time Frame: Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
The athlete's task was to perform such a shot that the shuttlecock flew between the net and the colored string, giving the shuttlecock the highest possible velocity, Badminton subjects use their own rackets (according to the player's personal preferences) to spike the ball, test 10 balls, and record the number successful of 10 balls(times), and use a SMART BDMINTON SENSOR to record the speed of each ball(km/h). The test process is as follows in sit smash, jump smash, move left smash, move right smash, back smash.
Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Effects of back smash among college students
Time Frame: Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
The athlete's task was to perform such a shot that the shuttlecock flew between the net and the colored string, giving the shuttlecock the highest possible velocity, Badminton subjects use their own rackets (according to the player's personal preferences) to spike the ball, test 10 balls, and record the number successful of 10 balls(times), and use a SMART BDMINTON SENSOR to record the speed of each ball(km/h). The test process is as follows in sit smash, jump smash, move left smash, move right smash, back smash.
Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: kims@upm.edu.my Soh, Universiti Putra Malaysia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 5, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 5, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 5, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Ma Shuzhen

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Athletes

Clinical Trials on Core straining

Subscribe