- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05581940
Pediatric Caudal Anesthesia Block. And Pain Control (CEB)
The Effect of Caudal Anesthesia Block on Perioperative Pain Control and Reduction of the Anesthetic Agent in Pediatric Infra-umbilical Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial Study
Caudal epidural block CEB is the most commonly performed neuraxial block to provide effective pain relief and analgesia in patients undergoing infra-umbilical pediatric surgery. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of adding CEB to general anesthesia in terms of intra- and post-operative pain management. Design: Double-unblinded.
Prospective. randomized. Study, Setting: salmanyia medical complex. intraoperative, postoperative recovery room Methods: A total of 72 patients American Society of Anesthesiology physical status classification ASA 1. Patients were equally allocated into two groups Group A and with CEB and Group B without CEB, aged two months to six years. respectively, over a study period of six months. Both groups were compared based on hemodynamic stability, level of sedation, analgesia need, pain score, and parental satisfaction. Postoperative pain was evaluated by four different pain scales.
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Manama, Bahrain, 122001
- Salmanyia Medical Complex
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children aged between two months and six years
- who were undergoing infra-umbilical surgeries
- ASA PS I no any medical issues
Exclusion Criteria:
- CEB such as sacral anomaly
- bleeding diathesis, patients with neuromuscular disease,
- hemodynamically unstable were excluded from the study.
- Simple randomization was done to select patients who will receive CEB from the daily surgical list. This trial was not blinded.
- In terms of the sample size determination, for a study power of 80% and a probability of type I error of 5%, a total of 74 patients was required for the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Case-Control
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Pediatric caudal anesthesia block.
caudal epidural block is a neuraxial block to provide effective pain relief and analgesia in pediatrics undergoing infra-umbilical pediatric surgery this study aimed to compare the effectiveness of adding to general anesthesia in terms of Intra and post-op pain management.
A prospective, randomized case-controlled.A total of 72 patients aged two months to six years with (ASA PS) I (ASA I) were recruited over a six-month period between December 2019 and May 2020.
Patients were allocated into two groups A performed under general anesthesia with caudal block and group B performed under general anesthesia alone.
Both groups were compared based on hemodynamic stability, analgesia need, pain score, and parental satisfaction.
Postoperative pain was evaluated by the Pain Scale- Categorical and numerical variables of both groups were compared.
Results:
|
(CEB) in group A using drugs bupivacaine 0.25% commonly used in children including neonates in group A In infraumbilical operations, it is used as a supplement to GA and to control postoperative pain It is a safe, easy, and effective type of central neuraxial block.[
The patient will be intubated and the caudal block will be performed under GA after securing the airway.
The patient's position will be turned onto the lateral decubitus then a landmark-based, blind technique will be used.
In children, the success rate with the blind technique is above 96% but the occurrence of side effects is reported.
Group B uses general anesthesia (GA) alone for intraoperative and perioperative pain control used the opioid intervious without caudal block .
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
demographic data in two groups recorded and compared intra operation room.
Time Frame: Demographic data of children in both groups. Recorded through study completion, an average of 1 year".
|
the patient's in two groups .The demographic data for all patients as age\months, sex\female ,male, weight( kilogram ,Height\centimeter were recorded in the anesthesia chart.
|
Demographic data of children in both groups. Recorded through study completion, an average of 1 year".
|
|
hemodynamics changed in Bothe groups intra op and one hour and six hours post op
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year". Measures of change in bassline of hemodynamic stability in both groups A and B Period preop and interop and post operation the data are presented as mean ± standard deviation .
|
the Baseline Systolic and diastolic Blood Pressure pre operation and intraoperation and 60 minuet post operation have been recorded in group A and group B..
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year". Measures of change in bassline of hemodynamic stability in both groups A and B Period preop and interop and post operation the data are presented as mean ± standard deviation .
|
|
pain scores and sedation degree of children through one and six hours post operation in both groups
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year Continuous variables were compared period one hour and 6 hours post op using Mann-Whitney U.df=degree of freedom,
|
pain scores at the various time points, and postoperative analgesia Based on the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, consolability (FLACC) scale is a measurement used to assess pain for children between the age of 2 month and 7 years or individuals that are unable to communicate their pain .the
scale is scored range from 0 to 10 with 0 is presenting no paint the scale has five criteria witch are each assigned a score of 0,1 or ,2,
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year Continuous variables were compared period one hour and 6 hours post op using Mann-Whitney U.df=degree of freedom,
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Differences in CHEOPS Score (4-13) d\through one hour and six hours post operation. between group A and B
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year pain scale that is used to assist the pain in children in bout groups.
|
All Children have been observed by nurses and anesthesiologists in post anesthesia care unit using the children s Hospital Estern Ontario Pain ScaleCHEOPS is a behaviors pain scale in young children for evaluating postoperative pain it used to monitor the effectiveness of interventions for reducing the pain and discomfort .CHEOPS pain score is sum points for the all 6 parameters cry.
facial.
touch.
legs.
child verbal.
Torso.
the score ranging from 4 to 13 where is considered above 5 presented of pain .and the score recorded at the 30 minutes .and
60 minutes add to 6 hours post operation.
Using Mann-Whitney U test and categorical variables were compared using *Fisher's exact test or †Pearson Chi-square test.
P value is considered statistically significant and, degree of freedom, confidence interval
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year pain scale that is used to assist the pain in children in bout groups.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Zeana Gawe, specialist, Salmanyia Medical Complex
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Hicks CL, von Baeyer CL, Spafford PA, van Korlaar I, Goodenough B. The Faces Pain Scale-Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement. Pain. 2001 Aug;93(2):173-183. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00314-1.
- Suresh S, Long J, Birmingham PK, De Oliveira GS Jr. Are caudal blocks for pain control safe in children? an analysis of 18,650 caudal blocks from the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network (PRAN) database. Anesth Analg. 2015 Jan;120(1):151-156. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000446.
- Banerjee A, Das B, Mukherjee D, Khanra M. A study of the effect of caudal epidural block on bispectral index targeted propofol requirement in children: A comparative study. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2015 Apr-Jun;20(2):77-81. doi: 10.4103/0971-9261.151551.
- Shamim F, Ullah H, Khan FA. Postoperative pain assessment using four behavioral scales in Pakistani children undergoing elective surgery. Saudi J Anaesth. 2015 Apr-Jun;9(2):174-8. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.152874.
- Senoglu N, Senoglu M, Oksuz H, Gumusalan Y, Yuksel KZ, Zencirci B, Ezberci M, Kizilkanat E. Landmarks of the sacral hiatus for caudal epidural block: an anatomical study. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Nov;95(5):692-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei236. Epub 2005 Sep 9.
- Kao SC, Lin CS. Caudal Epidural Block: An Updated Review of Anatomy and Techniques. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:9217145. doi: 10.1155/2017/9217145. Epub 2017 Feb 26.
- Ozen V, Yigit D. A comparison of the postoperative analgesic effectiveness of low dose caudal epidural block and US-guided dorsal penile nerve block with in-plane technique in circumcision. J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Feb;16(1):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.10.020. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
- Nikooseresht M, Hashemi M, Mohajerani SA, Shahandeh F, Agah M. Ultrasound as a screening tool for performing caudal epidural injections. Iran J Radiol. 2014 May;11(2):e13262. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.13262. Epub 2014 May 15.
- Kim YH, Park HJ, Cho S, Moon DE. Assessment of factors affecting the difficulty of caudal epidural injections in adults using ultrasound. Pain Res Manag. 2014 Sep-Oct;19(5):275-9. doi: 10.1155/2014/679128. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
- Shin SK, Hong JY, Kim WO, Koo BN, Kim JE, Kil HK. Ultrasound evaluation of the sacral area and comparison of sacral interspinous and hiatal approach for caudal block in children. Anesthesiology. 2009 Nov;111(5):1135-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181bc6dd4.
- Ben-David B, Vaida S, Gaitini L. The influence of high spinal anesthesia on sensitivity to midazolam sedation. Anesth Analg. 1995 Sep;81(3):525-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199509000-00017.
- Joo J, Kim J, Lee J. The prevalence of anatomical variations that can cause inadvertent dural puncture when performing caudal block in Koreans: a study using magnetic resonance imaging. Anaesthesia. 2010 Jan;65(1):23-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06168.x. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
- Manchikanti L, Cash KA, Pampati V, McManus CD, Damron KS. Evaluation of fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injections. Pain Physician. 2004 Jan;7(1):81-92.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 123311219
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative
-
National and Kapodistrian University of AthensCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | Postoperative Pain After Thoracic SurgeryGreece
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Not yet recruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain Management | Postoperative Pain in Orthopaedics
-
University of MalayaActive, not recruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain ManagementMalaysia
-
Maimonides Medical CenterCompletedPOSTOPERATIVE PAINUnited States
-
University Hospital, AntwerpUnknown
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Thoracotomy | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, ChronicTurkey
-
Dr. Negrin University HospitalCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, ChronicSpain
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | VATSTurkey
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityRecruitingPostoperative Pain ManagementTurkey
-
Pacira Pharmaceuticals, IncCompletedPostoperative Pain ManagementUnited States
Clinical Trials on Group A Caudal Epidural Anesthesia with bupivacaine 0.25% and group B with opioid intervenors
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)Recruiting
-
University of California, San FranciscoWithdrawn
-
Pain Management Center of PaducahCompletedLow Back PainUnited States
-
King Edward Medical UniversityCompletedPostoperative PainPakistan
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruiting
-
Shaare Zedek Medical CenterCompletedAnesthesia, CaudalIsrael
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompleted