Viewing Strategy Training in Children With (Cerebral) Visual Impairment

January 5, 2026 updated by: Royal Dutch Visio

Viewing Strategy Training in Children With (Cerebral) Visual Impairment: From Spontaneous Eye Movements to a Structured Viewing Strategy

Viewing strategies are strategies used to process visual Information. Many children with visual impairment seem to lack systematic viewing strategies. However, it is unknown how viewing strategies differ between children with normal vision and children with (cerebral) visual impairment. In addition, viewing strategy training is often adopted in clinical practice, but till date there is no scientific evidence about effectiveness of this approach.

The current project has two goals: (1) to measure viewing strategies used by children with normal vision, children with ocular visual impairment and children with CVI, and (2) to evaluate whether training viewing strategies results in more efficiënt visual Information processing.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Nijmegen, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • Royal Dutch Visio
        • Contact:
          • Hanna Romema, MSc
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Hanna Rozema, MSc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion criteria typically developing children with normal vision:

  • Age 5-12 years
  • linear distant visual acuity of 0.1 logMAR or better
  • Verbal IQ above 70
  • Absence of developmental disorders or psychiatric problems like ASS or AD(H)D

Inclusion criteria for children with ocular visual impairment:

  • Age 5-12 years
  • Children with linear distance visual acuity better <=1.3logMAR and >0.1 logMAR
  • Intact central visual field (at least > 30 degrees)
  • Children with a verbal IQ above 70
  • Absence of developmental disorders or psychiatric problems like ASS or AD(H)D

Inclusion criteria for children with cerebral visual impairment:

  • Age 5-12 years
  • Linear distance visual acuity <=0.3 logMAR
  • Having the diagnosis CVI (verified by ophthalmologists)
  • Children with a verbal IQ above 70
  • Absence of psychiatric problems like ASS or AD(H)D

Additional inclusion criterion for study 2 (evaluating training effectiveness): children with (cerebral) visual impairment should have an indication for viewing strategy training. Training should not be indicated if children have no problems performing academic tasks (i.e. when speed and accuracy of visual processing is within the normal range). The age range for study 2 is 5-9 years.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Children with VI: linear near visual acuity >1.0 logMAR
  • Children with visual field defect < 30 degrees
  • Children with a verbal IQ below 70
  • Children who attended a form of vision training in the past two years
  • Children with psychiatric problems like ASS or AD(H)D
  • Auditory impairment or language impairments
  • Major life events during training

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A) early training group
T0 = baseline measurement T1 = posttest (within two weeks after training) T2 = follow up measurement (6 months after training)
Children receive a visual training of viewing strategies (six weeks, 2 times a week, 30 minutes). During the training, children are instructed to use specific viewing strategies (looking in a structured direction which fits the task at hand, zooming in and out / change of visual selective attentional field, visual discrimination). The verbal instructions and exercises are protocol-based. A textbook is used to describe the reactions of the children during training.
Experimental: Group B) late training group
T0 = baseline measurement T1 = test-retest reliability and natural development (over period 1 1/2-2 months after T0) T2 = posttest (within two weeks after training)
Children receive a visual training of viewing strategies (six weeks, 2 times a week, 30 minutes). During the training, children are instructed to use specific viewing strategies (looking in a structured direction which fits the task at hand, zooming in and out / change of visual selective attentional field, visual discrimination). The verbal instructions and exercises are protocol-based. A textbook is used to describe the reactions of the children during training.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in reading accuracy after viewing strategy training
Time Frame: Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4
Radner reading test
Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4
Changes in reading speed after viewing strategy training
Time Frame: Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4
Radner reading test
Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4
Changes in visual search accuracy after training
Time Frame: Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4
Accuracy during conjunction search
Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4
Changes in visual search speed after training
Time Frame: Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4
Speed during conjunction search
Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4
Changes in saccade amplitudes during reading and visual search after training
Time Frame: Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4
Saccade amplitudes measured using Radner reading test and conjunction search
Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4
Changes in fixation duration during reading and search after training
Time Frame: Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4
Fixation durations measured using Radner reading test and conjunction search
Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4
Changes in average distance between fixation points during conjunction search (EB-VSA) after training
Time Frame: Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4
Average distance between fixation points using Radner reading test and conjunction search
Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in WISC-V visual processing speed index (VSI) after training
Time Frame: Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4
WISC-IV visual processing speed index
Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4
Changes in local visual selective attention after training
Time Frame: Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4
TEA-Ch Speurtocht (total number of symbols found in 1 minute)
Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4
Changes in global visual selective attention after training
Time Frame: Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4
Gestalt Closure (Kaufman-ABC), number of correct answers
Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4
Changes in visual identification speed after training
Time Frame: Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4
'DST-Plaatjes Benoemen', number of pictures correctly named within 1 minute
Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bianca Huurneman, PhD, Royal Dutch Visio

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 25, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vision Disorders

Clinical Trials on Viewing strategy training

Subscribe