Postoperative Sore Throat: Interest of the Videolaryngoscope

November 7, 2022 updated by: Mhamed Sami Mebazaa, Mongi Slim Hospital

Postoperative sore throat is a complication of orotracheal intubation. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of videolaryngoscopy on postoperative sore throat during the first 24 hours following surgery.

This was a prospective, randomized study, over a period of 9 months. The investigators included 136 patients with non-difficult airway, classified ASA I to III and over 18 years old. The patients were randomized into 2 groups: the VL group including 70 patients intubated with direct laryngoscopy and the LD group including 66 patients intubated with videolaryngoscopy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators monitored blood pressure, ECG, saturation in oxygen, capnograph, temperature and curarization. They also monitored cuff pressure using manometer.

The investigators pre-oxygenated the patients until the fractional expired oxygen was over 90%, then induced anaesthesia using either 2.5 to 3.5 mg/kg of propofol or 0.3 to 0.4 mg/kg of etomidate, then 1mg/kg of suxamethonium (in absence of contraindication). If modified crash induction was performed, the anaesthesiologist mentioned the opioid used.

The investigators performed laryngoscopy using either a Macintosh laryngoscope using a number 4 blade in LD group, or a McGrath video-laryngoscope with a number 4 blade in VL group and a stylet when needed. Women were intubated using number 7 tube and man using a 7.5 tube. They inflated the cuff with 7ml of air, and controlled pressure by manometer every 30 minutes in order to maintain it between 20 and 25 mmHg.

The investigators ventilated patients with assisted controlled mode using a 6ml/kg of ideal weight volume, a 6 mmHg PEEP, a 50% inspired fraction of oxygen and a respiratory rate guaranteeing an end-expiratory CO2 level between 35 and 40 mmHg. Then, they administrated 4 mg of Ondansetran in order to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

The investigators maintained anaesthesia using either isoflurane or sevoflurane, 0.1 μg/kg of sufentanil and 0.05 mg/kg of atracurium.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

135

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tunis
      • La Marsa, Tunis, Tunisia, 2046
        • Mongi Slim University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged over 18 years old;
  • Patients with ASA status 1, 2 or 3;
  • Patients who underwent surgery with general anaesthesia and intubation;
  • written consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under corticosteroids;
  • Pregnant women;
  • Patient with at least two difficult intubation criteria or a limited mouth opening (under 2cm), difficult airway management history, upper airway tumour or cervical rachis trauma;
  • Patients who had an otorhinolaryngologic infection in the last month, an intubation or endoscopy of upper airway in the last 48 hours, vomiting in the last 24 hours, a gastric tube in the last 24 hours or throat symptoms prior to surgery;
  • Patients scheduled for a surgery implying a manipulation of upper airways;
  • Patient scheduled for a surgery > 2 hours.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: VL Group
Patients who were intubated by videolaryngoscope.
The investigators performed laryngoscopy using a McGrath video-laryngoscope with a number 4 blade.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: LD Group
Patients who were intubated by direct laryngoscope
The investigators performed laryngoscopy using either a Macintosh laryngoscope using a number 4 blade.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative sore throat
Time Frame: 6 hours after surgery
Postoperative sore throat assessed by verbal scale (from 0 to 10)
6 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative sore throat
Time Frame: up to 24 hours after surgery.
Postoperative sore throat assessed by verbal scale (from 0 to 10)
up to 24 hours after surgery.
Postoperative dysphonia
Time Frame: up to 24 hours after surgery
Presence or no of dysphonia
up to 24 hours after surgery
Postoperative dysphagia
Time Frame: up to 24 hours after surgery
presence or no of dysphagia
up to 24 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 8, 2021

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 30, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe