Couples' QOL in Metastatic Breast Cancer (C-QOL)

February 21, 2024 updated by: Fox Chase Cancer Center

Quality of Life for Couples Facing Metastatic Breast Cancer

The primary objectives of this study are to adapt and evaluate a sexual quality of life intervention in women with metastatic breast cancer and their partners.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

112

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19111
        • Recruiting
        • Fox Chase Cancer Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is female
  • Patient is at least 18 years old
  • Patient has a diagnosis of metastatic (stage IV) breast cancer
  • Patient has a partner or spouse who is at least 18 years old
  • Patient lives with a romantic partner (same or opposite sex) for at least 6 months
  • Patient scores 3 or above on Patient Care Monitor sexual concerns item (range: 0-10)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient or partner is not able to speak and read English
  • Patient or partner has a hearing impairment
  • Patient or partner medically unable to participate as judged by physician/in medical record or by self-report
  • Patient and partner do not have reliable telephone access
  • Patient has overt cognitive dysfunction or psychiatric disturbance such as suicidal ideation or severe mental illness, as observed or judged by the researcher, physician or referring source, or self-report
  • Patient past or current history of any cancer other than non-melanoma skin cancer or breast cancer
  • Patient is currently participating in couple/marital therapy
  • Patient is currently pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Adapted Intimacy Enhancement
Participants receive intimacy enhancement sessions and read a booklet about intimacy and metastatic breast cancer
Participants attend four virtual sessions (60-75 minutes) with a couples' coach consisting of education and skills training to enhance physical and emotional intimacy.
Self-guided booklet of readings/resources about intimacy and metastatic breast cancer
Active Comparator: Intimacy Facts & Resources
Participants read a booklet about intimacy and metastatic breast cancer.
Self-guided booklet of readings/resources about intimacy and metastatic breast cancer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Self-Reported Patient Sexual Function
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
Patients' self-reported sexual function will be measured using the 19-item Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI).Total scale scores range from 2 to 36, with higher scores indicating higher functioning. Mean change scores will be reported: positive mean change scores indicate increase in sexual functioning over time while negative mean change scores indicate decrease in sexual functioning over time.
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
Change in Self-Reported Patient Sexual Distress
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
Patient sexual distress will be measured using the 13-item Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (FSDS-R). Total scale scores range from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate higher levels of sexual distress. Change in patient mean sexual distress score over time will be reported. Negative mean change scores indicate decrease in sexual distress.
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
Change in Patient Self-Reported Self-Efficacy for Coping with Sexual Concerns
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
Patient self-efficacy for coping with sexual concerns will be measured using 3 items asking how certain the patient is that she can deal with issues related to physical intimacy. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy. Change in patient mean self-efficacy score over time will be reported, with a positive change score reflecting an increase in self-efficacy.
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Patient Self-Reported Intimacy-Related Communication
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
Sexual communication is assessed through a brief 6-item version of the Dyadic Sexual Communication Scale (DSCS). Total scale scores range from 1 to 36. Higher scores indicate higher quality of intimacy-related communication. Change in patient mean score over time will be reported. Positive mean change scores indicate increase in quality of sexual communication.
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
Change in Patient Self-Reported Relationship Intimacy
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
Patient self-reported relationship intimacy will be measured using the 17-item Miller Social Intimacy Scale (MSIS). This scale assesses emotional intimacy, closeness and trust toward an individual's partner. Scores range from 17 to 170, with higher scores indicating higher levels of intimacy. Change in patient mean relationship intimacy score over time will be reported. Positive mean change scores indicate increase in relationship intimacy.
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
Change in Patient Self-Reported Anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
Patients' self-reported anxiety will be measured using the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7). Total scale scores range from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. Change in mean anxiety score over time will be reported. Negative mean change scores indicate decrease in anxiety.
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
Change in Patient Self-Reported Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
Patients' self-reported depression will be measured using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Total scale scores range from 0 to 27. Higher scores indicate higher levels of depression. Change in mean depression score over time will be reported. Negative mean change scores indicate decrease in depression.
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
Change in Self-Reported Partner Sexual Function
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
Partners' (male) self-reported sexual function will be measured using the 15-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Total scale scores range from 1 to 75, with higher scores indicating a higher level of sexual functioning. Mean change scores will be reported: positive mean change scores indicate increase in sexual functioning over time while negative mean change scores indicate decrease in sexual functioning over time.
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
Change in Self-Reported Partner Sexual Distress
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
Partner sexual distress will be measured using the 25-item Index of Sexual Satisfaction (ISS). Total scale scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate higher levels of sexual distress. Change in partner mean sexual distress score over time will be reported. Negative mean change scores indicate decrease in sexual distress.
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
Change in Partner Self-Reported Self-Efficacy for Coping with Sexual Concerns
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
Partner self-efficacy for coping with sexual concerns will be measured using 3 items asking how certain the partner is that he/she can deal with issues related to physical intimacy. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy. Change in partner mean self-efficacy score over time will be reported, with a positive change score reflecting an increase in self-efficacy.
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
Change in Partner Self-Reported Intimacy-Related Communication
Time Frame: Baseline to 9 weeks
Sexual communication is assessed through a brief 6-item version of the Dyadic Sexual Communication Scale (DSCS). Total scale scores range from 1 to 36. Higher scores indicate higher quality of intimacy-related communication. Change in partner mean score over time will be reported. Positive mean change scores indicate increase in quality of sexual communication.
Baseline to 9 weeks
Change in Partner Self-Reported Relationship Intimacy
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
Partner self-reported relationship intimacy will be measured using the 17-item Miller Social Intimacy Scale (MSIS). This scale assesses emotional intimacy, closeness and trust toward an individual's partner. Scores range from 17 to 170, with higher scores indicating higher levels of intimacy. Change in partner mean relationship intimacy score over time will be reported. Positive mean change scores indicate increase in relationship intimacy.
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
Change in Partner Self-Reported Anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
Partners' self-reported anxiety will be measured using the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7). Total scale scores range from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. Change in mean anxiety score over time will be reported. Negative mean change scores indicate decrease in anxiety.
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
Change in Partner Self-Reported Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
Partners' self-reported depression will be measured using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Total scale scores range from 0 to 27. Higher scores indicate higher levels of depression. Change in mean depression score over time will be reported. Negative mean change scores indicate decrease in depression.
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20-1039

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Adapted Intimacy Enhancement

3
Subscribe