- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05636943
Couples' QOL in Metastatic Breast Cancer (C-QOL)
February 21, 2024 updated by: Fox Chase Cancer Center
Quality of Life for Couples Facing Metastatic Breast Cancer
The primary objectives of this study are to adapt and evaluate a sexual quality of life intervention in women with metastatic breast cancer and their partners.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
112
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Jennifer B. Reese, PhD
- Phone Number: 215-214-3223
- Email: jennifer.reese@fccc.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Kristen A. Sorice
- Phone Number: 215-214-1433
- Email: kristen.sorice@fccc.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19111
- Recruiting
- Fox Chase Cancer Center
-
Contact:
- Kristen Sorice
- Phone Number: 215-214-1433
- Email: kristen.sorice@fccc.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient is female
- Patient is at least 18 years old
- Patient has a diagnosis of metastatic (stage IV) breast cancer
- Patient has a partner or spouse who is at least 18 years old
- Patient lives with a romantic partner (same or opposite sex) for at least 6 months
- Patient scores 3 or above on Patient Care Monitor sexual concerns item (range: 0-10)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient or partner is not able to speak and read English
- Patient or partner has a hearing impairment
- Patient or partner medically unable to participate as judged by physician/in medical record or by self-report
- Patient and partner do not have reliable telephone access
- Patient has overt cognitive dysfunction or psychiatric disturbance such as suicidal ideation or severe mental illness, as observed or judged by the researcher, physician or referring source, or self-report
- Patient past or current history of any cancer other than non-melanoma skin cancer or breast cancer
- Patient is currently participating in couple/marital therapy
- Patient is currently pregnant
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Adapted Intimacy Enhancement
Participants receive intimacy enhancement sessions and read a booklet about intimacy and metastatic breast cancer
|
Participants attend four virtual sessions (60-75 minutes) with a couples' coach consisting of education and skills training to enhance physical and emotional intimacy.
Self-guided booklet of readings/resources about intimacy and metastatic breast cancer
|
Active Comparator: Intimacy Facts & Resources
Participants read a booklet about intimacy and metastatic breast cancer.
|
Self-guided booklet of readings/resources about intimacy and metastatic breast cancer
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Self-Reported Patient Sexual Function
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Patients' self-reported sexual function will be measured using the 19-item Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI).Total scale scores range from 2 to 36, with higher scores indicating higher functioning.
Mean change scores will be reported: positive mean change scores indicate increase in sexual functioning over time while negative mean change scores indicate decrease in sexual functioning over time.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Change in Self-Reported Patient Sexual Distress
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Patient sexual distress will be measured using the 13-item Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (FSDS-R).
Total scale scores range from 0 to 52.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of sexual distress.
Change in patient mean sexual distress score over time will be reported.
Negative mean change scores indicate decrease in sexual distress.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Change in Patient Self-Reported Self-Efficacy for Coping with Sexual Concerns
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Patient self-efficacy for coping with sexual concerns will be measured using 3 items asking how certain the patient is that she can deal with issues related to physical intimacy.
Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy.
Change in patient mean self-efficacy score over time will be reported, with a positive change score reflecting an increase in self-efficacy.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Patient Self-Reported Intimacy-Related Communication
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Sexual communication is assessed through a brief 6-item version of the Dyadic Sexual Communication Scale (DSCS).
Total scale scores range from 1 to 36.
Higher scores indicate higher quality of intimacy-related communication.
Change in patient mean score over time will be reported.
Positive mean change scores indicate increase in quality of sexual communication.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Change in Patient Self-Reported Relationship Intimacy
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Patient self-reported relationship intimacy will be measured using the 17-item Miller Social Intimacy Scale (MSIS).
This scale assesses emotional intimacy, closeness and trust toward an individual's partner.
Scores range from 17 to 170, with higher scores indicating higher levels of intimacy.
Change in patient mean relationship intimacy score over time will be reported.
Positive mean change scores indicate increase in relationship intimacy.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Change in Patient Self-Reported Anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Patients' self-reported anxiety will be measured using the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7).
Total scale scores range from 0 to 21.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.
Change in mean anxiety score over time will be reported.
Negative mean change scores indicate decrease in anxiety.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Change in Patient Self-Reported Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Patients' self-reported depression will be measured using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).
Total scale scores range from 0 to 27.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of depression.
Change in mean depression score over time will be reported.
Negative mean change scores indicate decrease in depression.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Change in Self-Reported Partner Sexual Function
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Partners' (male) self-reported sexual function will be measured using the 15-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF).
Total scale scores range from 1 to 75, with higher scores indicating a higher level of sexual functioning.
Mean change scores will be reported: positive mean change scores indicate increase in sexual functioning over time while negative mean change scores indicate decrease in sexual functioning over time.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Change in Self-Reported Partner Sexual Distress
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Partner sexual distress will be measured using the 25-item Index of Sexual Satisfaction (ISS).
Total scale scores range from 0 to 100.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of sexual distress.
Change in partner mean sexual distress score over time will be reported.
Negative mean change scores indicate decrease in sexual distress.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Change in Partner Self-Reported Self-Efficacy for Coping with Sexual Concerns
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Partner self-efficacy for coping with sexual concerns will be measured using 3 items asking how certain the partner is that he/she can deal with issues related to physical intimacy.
Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy.
Change in partner mean self-efficacy score over time will be reported, with a positive change score reflecting an increase in self-efficacy.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Change in Partner Self-Reported Intimacy-Related Communication
Time Frame: Baseline to 9 weeks
|
Sexual communication is assessed through a brief 6-item version of the Dyadic Sexual Communication Scale (DSCS).
Total scale scores range from 1 to 36.
Higher scores indicate higher quality of intimacy-related communication.
Change in partner mean score over time will be reported.
Positive mean change scores indicate increase in quality of sexual communication.
|
Baseline to 9 weeks
|
Change in Partner Self-Reported Relationship Intimacy
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Partner self-reported relationship intimacy will be measured using the 17-item Miller Social Intimacy Scale (MSIS).
This scale assesses emotional intimacy, closeness and trust toward an individual's partner.
Scores range from 17 to 170, with higher scores indicating higher levels of intimacy.
Change in partner mean relationship intimacy score over time will be reported.
Positive mean change scores indicate increase in relationship intimacy.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Change in Partner Self-Reported Anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Partners' self-reported anxiety will be measured using the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7).
Total scale scores range from 0 to 21.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.
Change in mean anxiety score over time will be reported.
Negative mean change scores indicate decrease in anxiety.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Change in Partner Self-Reported Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Partners' self-reported depression will be measured using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).
Total scale scores range from 0 to 27.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of depression.
Change in mean depression score over time will be reported.
Negative mean change scores indicate decrease in depression.
|
Baseline, 9 weeks, 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 31, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 31, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 21, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 1, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
December 5, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
February 22, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 21, 2024
Last Verified
February 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20-1039
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Metastatic Breast Cancer
-
Gilead SciencesRecruitingStudy of Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG) in Japanese Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors (ASCENT-J02)Advanced Solid Tumor | Metastatic Urothelial Cancer | Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer | HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast CancerJapan
-
GlycoMimetics IncorporatedTerminatedBreast Cancer | Breast Cancer Metastatic | HR+ Metastatic Breast CancerUnited States
-
BriaCell Therapeutics CorporationRecruitingBreast Cancer | Breast Neoplasm | Metastatic Breast Cancer | Breast Cancer Metastatic | End Stage CancerUnited States
-
OBI Pharma, IncCompletedMetastatic Colorectal Cancer | Metastatic Lung Cancer | Metastatic Breast Cancer | Metastatic Gastric CancerTaiwan
-
Massachusetts General HospitalPuma Biotechnology, Inc.; Celcuity, Inc.WithdrawnMetastatic Breast Cancer | Invasive Breast Cancer | HER2-negative Breast Cancer | ER Positive Breast Cancer | PR-Positive Breast Cancer | Stage IV (Metastatic) Breast CancerUnited States
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedMetastatic Breast Cancer | Postmenopausal Women | Locally Advanced Metastatic Breast CancerIsrael
-
Institut de Recherches Internationales ServierADIR, a Servier Group companyCompletedMetastatic Breast Cancer | Metastatic Triple Negative Breast CancerJapan, Belgium, France, Netherlands
-
Prof. Wolfgang JanniEli Lilly and CompanyRecruitingHormone Receptor-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer | HER2-negative Metastatic Breast CancerGermany, Switzerland
-
BriaCell Therapeutics CorporationLumaBridgeEnrolling by invitationBreast Cancer | Breast Neoplasm | Metastatic Breast Cancer | Breast Cancer MetastaticUnited States
-
Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand ParisDaiichi SankyoRecruitingAdvanced Breast Cancer | HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer | Breast Cancer Metastatic | HER2 Low Breast CarcinomaFrance
Clinical Trials on Adapted Intimacy Enhancement
-
Fox Chase Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Completed
-
Massachusetts General HospitalActive, not recruitingDepression | Cardiovascular Diseases | Acute Coronary SyndromeUnited States
-
University of MichiganNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Completed
-
Fox Chase Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedBreast CancerUnited States
-
University of MichiganNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)CompletedAlcohol MisuseUnited States
-
Erla Kolbrún SvavarsdóttirLandspitali University HospitalCompleted
-
Universidad de MurciaCompleted
-
Pennington Biomedical Research CenterCompleted
-
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De MarseilleNot yet recruiting
-
University of ExtremaduraRecruitingCerebral Palsy | Assessment, Self | Technology AddictionSpain