A Clinical Study Investigating the Effects of a Dentifrice Containing 67% Sodium Bicarbonate When Used Twice Daily for 12 Weeks on Gingivitis Treatment and Plaque Removal

November 20, 2024 updated by: HALEON

A Randomized, Controlled, Examiner-Blind Clinical Study Investigating the Effects of a Dentifrice Containing 67% Sodium Bicarbonate When Used Twice Daily for 12 Weeks on Gingivitis Treatment and Plaque Removal

The main goal of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of an on-market dentifrice containing 67 percent (%) sodium bicarbonate and 0.31% sodium fluoride to a reference regular fluoride dentifrice on treating gingival bleeding and gingival inflammation as well as reducing plaque accumulation in population with gingivitis after 12 weeks use.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This will be a single center, controlled, single blind (examiner blind), randomized, two treatment arm, parallel study in volunteers with clinically measurable levels of gingivitis (defined as those with 10-30% bleeding sites on probing). Approximately 200 participants (100 per group) will be randomized to ensure 188 evaluable participants (94 per group) complete the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

197

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bristol, United Kingdom, BS1 2LY
        • University of Bristol, Bristol Dental School and Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant provision of a signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the Participant has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study before any assessment is performed.
  • Participant who is willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, and other study procedures.
  • A Participant in good general and mental health with, in the opinion of the investigator or medically qualified designee, no clinically significant/relevant abnormalities in medical history or upon oral examination, or condition, that would impact the Participant's safety, wellbeing or the outcome of the study, if they were to participate in the study, or affect the individual's ability to understand and follow study procedures and requirements.
  • Participant oral health that meets all the following:

At Screening (Visit 1):

  1. Participant with at least 20 natural, permanent teeth.
  2. Participant with at least 40 evaluable surfaces for MGI, BI, and TPI (An evaluable surface is defined as having 2/3rds of the natural tooth surface gradable for the selected clinical indices. The following should not be included in the evaluable surface count- third molars; fully crowned/extensively restored, grossly carious, orthodontically banded/bonded or abutment teeth; surfaces with calculus deposits which, in the opinion of the clinical examiner, would interfere with the baseline assessments of the selected clinical indices).
  3. A participant with plaque-induced gingivitis, in the opinion of the clinical examiner, as confirmed by a gross visual examination at the Screening Visit.

At Baseline (Visit 2):

  1. A participant with ongoing hard tissue eligibility and, in the opinion of the clinical examiner, at least 40 evaluable surfaces.
  2. A participant with 10% less than (<) bleeding on probing (BOP) < 30%.
  3. A participant with mean whole mouth TPI score more than or equal to (>=)1.5.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A participant who is an employee of the investigational site, either directly involved in the conduct of the study or a member of their immediate family; or an employee of the investigational site otherwise supervised by the investigator; or, a sponsor's employee directly involved in the conduct of the study or a member of their immediate family.
  • A participant who has participated in other studies (including non-medicinal studies) involving investigational product(s) within 30 days prior to study entry and/or during study participation.
  • A participant with, in the opinion of the investigator or medically qualified designee, an acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or investigational product administration or may interfere with the interpretation of study results and, in the judgment of the investigator or medically qualified designee, would make the participant inappropriate for entry into this study.
  • A participant who has any other clinical serious or unstable conditions (such as, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, liver disorders, and kidney disorders) which could have affected study out comes and/or participant safety.
  • A participant who is a pregnant female (self-reported) or is intending to become pregnant over the duration of the study.
  • A participant who is a breastfeeding female.
  • A participant who is known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients.
  • A participant who is unwilling or unable to comply with the lifestyle considerations.
  • Participant who is a current smoker or an ex-smoker who stopped within 6 months of Screening.
  • Participant who is using smokeless forms of tobacco (such as, chewing tobacco, gutkha, pan containing tobacco, nicotine-based e-cigarettes).
  • A participant who is diagnosed xerostomia or is taking any medication that in the view of the investigator is causing xerostomia.
  • A participant who has a medical condition which could have directly influenced gingival bleeding.
  • A participant who has a bleeding disorder that could have affected study outcomes and/or participant safety.
  • A participant who has a recent history (within the last year) of alcohol or other substance abuse.
  • A participant who has a severe oral condition (such as, acute necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis or oral or peri-oral ulceration including herpetic lesions) that could, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise study outcomes or the oral health of the participant/examiner if they participate in the study.
  • Presence of a tongue or lip piercing, or any other oral feature that could interfere with the usage of a toothbrush.

Medication Exclusions At Screening (Visit 1):

  1. A participant using any antibiotic medication within 14 days prior to screening or at any time during the study.
  2. A participant currently taking an anti-inflammatory medication which, in the opinion of the Investigator, could affect gingival condition.
  3. A participant currently taking a systemic medication (such as, anti-inflammatory, anticoagulant, immunosuppressants) or traditional/ herbal remedy which, in the opinion of the Investigator, could affect plaque/ gingival condition (such as, ibuprofen, aspirin, warfarin, cyclosporin, phenytoin, calcium channel blockers).

Medication Exclusions at Baseline (visit 2):

  1. A participant who has taken (in the previous 14 days), any antibiotics.
  2. A participant who has taken (in the previous 14 days) a systemic medication (such as, anti-inflammatory, anti-coagulant, immunosuppressants) or traditional/ herbal remedy which, in the opinion of the Investigator, could affect plaque/ gingival condition (such as, ibuprofen, aspirin, warfarin, cyclosporin, phenytoin, calcium channel blockers).
  3. A participant who has used an antibacterial dentifrice or mouthwash (such as, chlorhexidine) or any oral care product that in the view of the investigator could interfere with plaque formation or measures of gingivitis, in the period between Screening and the Baseline visit.

Periodontal Exclusions

  1. A participant who shows signs of periodontitis (one or more sites with probing pocket depths more than [>] 3 mm).
  2. A participant who is receiving or has received treatment for periodontal disease (including surgery) within 12 months of Screening.
  3. A participant who has gingivitis, which in the opinion of the investigator, is not expected to respond to treatment with an over the counter (OTC) dentifrice.

Dental Exclusions

  1. A participant who has active caries that could, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise study outcomes or the oral health of the participant if they participate in the study.
  2. A participant who has dentures (partial or full).
  3. A participant who has an orthodontic appliance (bands, appliances, or fixed/ removable retainers).
  4. A participant who received orthodontic therapy within 3 months of Screening.
  5. A participant who has numerous restorations in a poor state of repair.
  6. A participant who has any dental condition (such as, overcrowding) that could, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise study outcomes or the oral health of the participant if they participate in the study.
  7. A participant who has had dental prophylaxis within 12 weeks of Screening.
  8. A participant who has had teeth bleaching within 12 weeks of Screening.
  9. A participant who has high levels of extrinsic stain or calculus deposits, in the opinion of the investigator, that could have interfered with plaque assessments.
  10. A participant who has previously been enrolled in this study.
  11. A participant who, in the opinion of the investigator or medically qualified designee, should not participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Corsodyl Original Dentifrice
Participants will be instructed to brush their teeth using test product for at least a minute twice a day (morning and evening) for 12 weeks. Participants will dose the toothbrush provided with a ribbon of paste to cover the brush head (a full brush head) on each brushing occasion.
It contains 67% weight/weight (w/w) Sodium Bicarbonate and 0.310% w/w Sodium Fluoride (1400 parts per million [ppm] Fluoride ion [F])
Active Comparator: Colgate Cavity Protection Dentifrice
Participants will be instructed to brush their teeth using reference product for at least a minute twice a day (morning and evening) for 12 weeks. Participants will dose the toothbrush provided with a ribbon of paste to cover the brush head (a full brush head) on each brushing occasion.
It contains 0.76% w/w Sodium Monofluorophosphate (1000 ppm F) and 0.1% w/w Sodium Fluoride (450 ppm F)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Sites at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
The number of bleeding sites was calculated using the bleeding index (BI) assessment. The BI was assessed for all evaluable surfaces (having two-thirds of the natural tooth surface gradable for the assessment) of the facial and lingual/palatal gingiva, 6 sites per tooth (mesiobuccal, buccal, and distobuccal; mesiolingual/palatal, lingual/palatal, and distolingual/palatal). Evaluable tooth sites were probed, and gingival bleeding was assessed for approximately 30 seconds after probing. The number of bleeding sites for each participant was calculated as the number of evaluable tooth sites with bleeding observed immediately on probing or within 30 seconds of probing. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 12. Baseline was defined as Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in gingival bleeding.
Baseline and Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Sites at Week 12 (Test Product Versus [vs.] Reference Product)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
The number of bleeding sites was calculated using the BI assessment. The BI was assessed for all evaluable surfaces (having two-thirds of the natural tooth surface gradable for the assessment) of the facial and lingual/palatal gingiva, 6 sites per tooth (mesiobuccal, buccal, and distobuccal; mesiolingual/palatal, lingual/palatal, and distolingual/palatal). Evaluable tooth sites were probed, and gingival bleeding was assessed for approximately 30 seconds after probing. The number of bleeding sites for each participant was calculated as the number of evaluable tooth sites with bleeding observed immediately on probing or within 30 seconds of probing. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 12. Baseline was defined as Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in gingival bleeding.
Baseline and Week 12
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Sites at Week 3 and Week 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6
The number of bleeding sites was calculated using the BI assessment. The BI was assessed for all evaluable surfaces (having two-thirds of the natural tooth surface gradable for the assessment) of the facial and lingual/palatal gingiva, 6 sites per tooth (mesiobuccal, buccal, and distobuccal; mesiolingual/palatal, lingual/palatal, and distolingual/palatal). Evaluable tooth sites were probed, and gingival bleeding was assessed for approximately 30 seconds after probing. The number of bleeding sites for each participant was calculated as the number of evaluable tooth sites with bleeding observed immediately on probing or within 30 seconds of probing. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at each indicated timepoint. Baseline was defined as Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in gingival bleeding.
Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Sites at Week 3 and Week 6 (Test Product vs. Reference Product)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6
The number of bleeding sites was calculated using the BI assessment. The BI was assessed for all evaluable surfaces (having two-thirds of the natural tooth surface gradable for the assessment) of the facial and lingual/palatal gingiva, 6 sites per tooth (mesiobuccal, buccal, and distobuccal; mesiolingual/palatal, lingual/palatal, and distolingual/palatal). Evaluable tooth sites were probed, and gingival bleeding was assessed for approximately 30 seconds after probing. The number of bleeding sites for each participant was calculated as the number of evaluable tooth sites with bleeding observed immediately on probing or within 30 seconds of probing. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at each indicated timepoint. Baseline was defined as Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in gingival bleeding.
Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Mean BI at Weeks 3, 6 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12
The BI was assessed for all evaluable surfaces (having two-thirds of the natural tooth surface gradable for the assessment) of the facial and lingual/palatal gingiva, 6 sites per tooth (mesiobuccal, buccal, and distobuccal; mesiolingual/palatal, lingual/palatal, and distolingual/palatal). Evaluable tooth sites were probed, and gingival bleeding was assessed for approximately 30 seconds after probing and scored on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 to 2, where 0=No bleeding after 30 seconds; 1=Bleeding observed within 30 seconds of probing; 2=Bleeding observed immediately on probing. Mean BI was calculated by taking the average over all tooth sites assessed for a participant. Lower score indicated better outcome. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at each indicated timepoint. Baseline was defined as Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in gingival bleeding.
Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Mean BI at Weeks 3, 6 and 12 (Test Product vs. Reference Product)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12
The BI was assessed for all evaluable surfaces (having two-thirds of the natural tooth surface gradable for the assessment) of the facial and lingual/palatal gingiva, 6 sites per tooth (mesiobuccal, buccal, and distobuccal; mesiolingual/palatal, lingual/palatal, and distolingual/palatal). Evaluable tooth sites were probed, and gingival bleeding was assessed for approximately 30 seconds after probing and scored on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 to 2, where 0=No bleeding after 30 seconds; 1=Bleeding observed within 30 seconds of probing; 2=Bleeding observed immediately on probing. Mean BI was calculated by taking the average over all tooth sites assessed for a participant. Lower score indicated better outcome. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at each indicated timepoint. Baseline was defined as Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in gingival bleeding.
Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Mean Modified Gingival Index (MGI) at Weeks 3, 6 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12
MGI assessment is a non-invasive evaluation which focuses on visual symptoms of gingivitis (example, redness, texture, edema). MGI was assessed for all evaluable surfaces of facial and lingual/palatal gingiva,4 sites per tooth and scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4, where 0=Absence of inflammation;1=Mild inflammation;slight change in color,little change in color;little change in texture of any portion of marginal or papillary gingival unit;2=Mild inflammation; criteria as 1 but involving the entire marginal or papillary gingival unit;3=Moderate inflammation;glazing, redness, edema, and/or hypertrophy of marginal or papillary gingival unit;4= Severe inflammation;marked redness, edema and/or hypertrophy of marginal or papillary gingival unit,spontaneous bleeding, congestion, or ulceration. Lower score indicated better outcome. Change from Baseline=Value at each indicated timepoint minus Baseline [Day 0] value. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in symptoms.
Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Mean MGI at Weeks 3, 6 and 12 (Test Product vs. Reference Product)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12
MGI assessment is a non-invasive evaluation which focuses on visual symptoms of gingivitis (example, redness, texture, edema). MGI was assessed for all evaluable surfaces of facial and lingual/palatal gingiva,4 sites per tooth and scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4, where 0=Absence of inflammation;1=Mild inflammation;slight change in color,little change in color;little change in texture of any portion of marginal or papillary gingival unit;2=Mild inflammation; criteria as 1 but involving the entire marginal or papillary gingival unit;3=Moderate inflammation;glazing, redness, edema, and/or hypertrophy of marginal or papillary gingival unit;4= Severe inflammation;marked redness, edema and/or hypertrophy of marginal or papillary gingival unit,spontaneous bleeding, congestion, or ulceration. Lower score indicated better outcome. Change from Baseline=Value at each indicated timepoint minus Baseline [Day 0] value. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in symptoms.
Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Overall TPI (Turesky Plaque Index) at Weeks 3, 6 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12
TPI was used to assess plaque on the facial and lingual surfaces of each scorable tooth (7-7 in each arch). 3 scores were recorded facially(distal, body, mesial sites), and 3 scores were recorded lingually(distal, body, mesial sites). Plaque was first disclosed using a dye solution and scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 to 5, where 0=No plaque; 1=Separate flecks of plaque at the cervical margin; 2=Thin continuous band of plaque (up to 1 millimeter[mm]) at the cervical margin; 3=Band of plaque wider than 1 mm but covering less than (<)1/3 of the tooth surface; 4=Plaque covering greater than or equal to (>=)1/3 but <2/3 of the tooth surface; 5=Plaque covering >=2/3 of the tooth surface. Mean overall TPI score=Average of TPI values over all tooth sites assessed for a participant. Lower score=better outcome. Change from Baseline=Value at each indicated timepoint minus Baseline value. Baseline=Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement (less plaque accumulation).
Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Overall TPI at Weeks 3, 6 and 12 (Test Product vs. Reference Product)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12
TPI was used to assess plaque on the facial and lingual surfaces of each scorable tooth (7-7 in each arch). 3 scores were recorded facially (distal, body, mesial sites), and 3 scores were recorded lingually (distal, body, mesial sites). Plaque was first disclosed using a dye solution and scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 to 5, where 0=No plaque; 1=Separate flecks of plaque at the cervical margin; 2=Thin continuous band of plaque (up to 1 mm) at the cervical margin; 3=Band of plaque wider than 1 mm but covering <1/3 of the tooth surface; 4=Plaque covering >=1/3 but <2/3 of the tooth surface; 5=Plaque covering >=2/3 of the tooth surface. Mean overall TPI score=Average of TPI values over all tooth sites assessed for a participant. Lower score=better outcome. Change from Baseline=Value at each indicated timepoint minus Baseline value. Baseline=Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement (less plaque accumulation).
Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Interproximal TPI at Weeks 3, 6 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12
TPI was used to assess plaque on the facial and lingual surfaces of each scorable tooth (7-7 in each arch). 3 scores were recorded facially (distal, mesial sites), and 3 scores were recorded lingually (distal, mesial sites). Plaque was first disclosed using a dye solution and scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 to 5, where 0=No plaque; 1=Separate flecks of plaque at the cervical margin; 2=Thin continuous band of plaque (up to 1 mm) at the cervical margin; 3=Band of plaque wider than 1 mm but covering <1/3 of the tooth surface; 4=Plaque covering >=1/3 but <2/3 of the tooth surface; 5=Plaque covering >=2/3 of the tooth surface. Mean interproximal TPI score=Average of TPI values over distal and mesial tooth sites assessed for a participant. Lower score indicated better outcome. Change from Baseline=Value at each indicated timepoint minus Baseline value. Baseline=Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement (less plaque accumulation).
Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Interproximal TPI at Weeks 3, 6 and 12 (Test Product vs. Reference Product)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12
TPI was used to assess plaque on the facial and lingual surfaces of each scorable tooth (7-7 in each arch). 3 scores were recorded facially (distal, mesial sites), and 3 scores were recorded lingually (distal, mesial sites). Plaque was first disclosed using a dye solution and scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 to 5, where 0=No plaque; 1=Separate flecks of plaque at the cervical margin; 2=Thin continuous band of plaque (up to 1 mm) at the cervical margin; 3=Band of plaque wider than 1 mm but covering <1/3 of the tooth surface; 4=Plaque covering >=1/3 but <2/3 of the tooth surface; 5=Plaque covering >=2/3 of the tooth surface. Mean interproximal TPI score=Average of TPI values over distal and mesial tooth sites assessed for a participant. Lower score indicated better outcome. Change from Baseline=Value at each indicated timepoint minus Baseline value. Baseline=Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement (less plaque accumulation).
Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 20, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Anonymized individual participant data and study documents can be requested for further research from ww.clinical-trial-register@haleon.com

IPD Sharing Time Frame

IPD will be made available within 6 months of publishing the results of the primary endpoints, key secondary endpoints and safety data of the study.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months, but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gingivitis

Clinical Trials on Corsodyl Original Dentifrice

Subscribe